Can Hair Color Reveal Mental Health? What Psychology Actually Supports
Updated: 3 days ago
Author: Angela Bogdanova · Published: September 27, 2026 · Editorial Policy
Research cluster: Hair Color Psychology · Written by Artificial Sapiens
Hair color cannot reveal whether a person has depression, bipolar disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), borderline personality disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism, or another mental-health or neurodevelopmental condition. Natural hair color is a pigmentation phenotype. Dyed hair color is a chosen or modified appearance cue. Neither is a validated diagnostic test or screening marker for mental health.
What hair color can sometimes affect is how other people interpret a person. Hair can become part of a first impression, a stereotype, or a self-presentation strategy. That makes hair color psychologically meaningful without making it diagnostically informative. A person may also attach private emotional meaning to changing their hair, but personal meaning is not the same thing as a symptom, a risk factor, a screening indicator, or a clinical diagnosis.
Evidence status: The clinical conclusion is established: mainstream diagnostic frameworks do not diagnose mental disorders from hair color or hair-dye choices. Evidence that hair color can shape social perception is reasonably supported, although much of the hair-color literature is culturally narrow and some studies are old. Direct evidence connecting hair-color choices to mental-health outcomes is limited and largely correlational. Claims that blue, pink, green, purple, blonde, brunette, red, gray, or any other hair color reveals a person's mental illness are not supported as diagnostic claims.
The Short Answer: Hair Color Is Not a Mental-Health Test
To say that hair color “reveals mental health” would require much more than finding a statistical association in one sample. A clinically useful marker needs adequate validity, reliability, sensitivity, specificity, and evidence that it adds meaningful information beyond ordinary clinical assessment. Hair color has not met that standard.
For depression, the National Institute of Mental Health describes diagnosis in terms of a persistent pattern of symptoms, including depressed mood or loss of interest or pleasure, with symptoms present most of the day, nearly every day, for at least two weeks. Clinicians also consider duration, frequency, functional impact, medical causes, and other explanations. Hair color is not part of that diagnostic process.
The same basic principle holds across other conditions. Bipolar disorder is assessed through the severity, duration, and frequency of mood, energy, activity, and behavioral changes across a person's history. PTSD requires a defined pattern of trauma-related symptoms lasting long enough and causing sufficient impairment. Borderline personality disorder is diagnosed through a thorough assessment of symptoms and personal and family history. ADHD requires a persistent developmental pattern of inattention and/or hyperactivity-impulsivity that begins in childhood, occurs across settings, and impairs functioning. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention explains that autism diagnosis relies on developmental history and professional observation of behavior using standardized criteria. None of these evaluations use hair color as a criterion.
Appearance Choice, Symptom, Risk Factor, Screening Indicator, and Diagnosis Are Different Things
Much of the confusion around hair color and mental health comes from collapsing several different categories into one. They should remain separate.
• Appearance choice: dyeing, bleaching, darkening, highlighting, or otherwise changing hair color.
• Possible personal meaning: what that choice means to the individual, such as novelty, aesthetics, belonging, experimentation, identity expression, or marking a transition.
• Behavior: the observable act of changing one's appearance.
• Symptom: a clinically relevant experience or behavior considered in relation to a specific disorder and its diagnostic criteria.
• Risk factor: a characteristic statistically associated with a greater probability of an outcome, without being the outcome itself.
• Screening indicator: a measure shown to help identify people who may warrant further assessment.
• Clinical diagnosis: a professional determination based on a defined pattern of symptoms, duration, impairment, history, context, and differential assessment.
A hair-color change can be a behavior and can carry personal meaning. That alone does not convert it into a symptom, risk factor, screening indicator, or diagnosis. A viral post that treats a visible choice as if it were a clinical sign skips all of the validation steps that separate an impression from evidence.
Natural Hair Color and Dyed Hair Color Ask Two Different Scientific Questions
Natural hair color is a biological pigmentation phenotype. The MedlinePlus Genetics overview of hair color explains that hair color depends on the type and amount of melanin and is influenced by many genes. Eumelanin and pheomelanin contribute to the visible range of human pigmentation, while genes such as MC1R are among the best-studied contributors.
Dyed hair color is different. Once a person deliberately changes hair color, the visible cue may reflect aesthetics, fashion, social identity, self-presentation, experimentation, concealment of gray hair, group belonging, or other motives. Those motives can be psychologically interesting, but they are not equivalent to a psychiatric condition.
This distinction matters because research on natural pigmentation cannot simply be transferred to chosen bright colors, and research on chosen appearance cannot be treated as evidence that a biological phenotype causes a psychological state. The relevant question is always: are researchers measuring pigmentation biology, appearance choice, observer perception, self-reported motives, actual symptoms, or a clinical diagnosis?
What Research on Unnatural Hair Color and Mental Health Actually Found
A 2022 paper titled “Blue hair and the blues: Dying your hair unnatural colours is associated with depression” has become a major source for online claims about bright hair and mental illness. Because the title is stronger than many people realize the underlying evidence allows, the design matters.
The study analyzed data from an older OKCupid dataset. Participants had answered profile questions about whether they had ever dyed their hair a “crazy, unnatural” color and separate questions about experiences such as seeing a therapist, feeling depressed, emotional variability, life satisfaction, and self-reported experience of mental illness. The authors reported an association between having dyed hair an unnatural color and a composite mental-health score, including after statistical controls. In the fully adjusted model, the sample was 8,710 people. The primary paper is therefore evidence of a correlation in one online-dating dataset, not evidence that bright hair diagnoses depression or any other disorder.
Several limitations are central. The mental-health variables came from profile questions rather than structured clinical interviews or validated diagnostic instruments. The hair question did not measure the specific color, intensity, timing, duration, or reason for dyeing. The design was observational, so it could not determine direction of causation. The sample consisted largely of Western online daters and cannot automatically represent other populations or eras.
The paper's own prediction metrics were weak. For individual mental-health indicators, reported R-squared values were 0 to .04 and area-under-the-curve values were .50 to .59. In practical terms, that is far from a clinically useful diagnostic signal. The authors also acknowledged measurement limitations and called for stronger outcome data and better measurement of unnatural hair color.
Evidence status: limited evidence. The study supports the narrow statement that, in this particular dataset, a history of unnatural hair dye was statistically associated with some self-reported mental-health variables. It does not establish causation, does not validate hair color as a screening tool, and does not justify diagnosing an individual from appearance.
What the 2022 study does not establish
It does not show that blue hair causes depression. It does not show that depression causes people to dye their hair. It does not show that any specific color maps onto any specific disorder. It does not establish that unnatural hair color is a symptom of borderline personality disorder, bipolar disorder, PTSD, ADHD, autism, or another diagnosis. It does not establish that a person with bright hair is emotionally unstable.
The paper's discussion proposed psychological explanations involving identity, nonconformity, and personality. Those explanations are hypotheses built around a correlation. They should not be presented as established mechanisms, and they are especially unsuitable for individual diagnosis.
Can Natural Hair Pigmentation Be Statistically Associated With Psychological Variables?
Occasionally, yes. That is scientifically different from saying hair color “reveals” a person's mental health.
A small 2006 study of 101 German toddlers reported an association between blonde hair and higher laboratory fear scores in a measure of behavioral inhibition. Moehler and colleagues studied a narrow developmental sample, not adults seeking mental-health diagnosis. Behavioral inhibition is a temperament-related construct and a possible risk marker in some developmental research; it is not a diagnosis. A result in 101 toddlers cannot be converted into a rule about blonde adults or used to infer anxiety from hair color.
A much larger 2019 preregistered study examined self-reported natural hair redness, skin pigmentation, and health variables in 4,117 mostly Czech and Slovak participants. Initial analyses found correlations between hair redness and several self-reported mental-health variables. However, Flegr and Sýkorová reported that most of those associations disappeared when skin darkness was included in the models. Their follow-up explanations involving vitamin D or folate were explicitly hypothetical because the study did not measure those nutrients.
This is a useful example of why a visible trait can appear predictive before a correlated factor is considered. Hair color can covary with skin pigmentation, ancestry, geography, age, cultural treatment, sun exposure, and other variables. A correlation attached to a visible phenotype may therefore be confounded, population-specific, or too small to have individual predictive value.
Evidence status: limited and context-dependent. Some studies report phenotype associations with psychological or health variables, but the findings do not validate hair color as a mental-health screening or diagnostic marker. The strongest scientific interpretation is about population-level association under specific study conditions, not about reading an individual's mind from pigmentation.
Hair Color Can Change Social Perception Without Revealing Inner Mental State
Hair color can matter psychologically because observers notice it. That is a social-perception effect.
Classic research by Lawson examined hair color, personality, and the observer, helping establish a long literature on attributed traits and hair-color stereotypes. In a later British study, Swami and Barrett used the same female confederate with different dyed hair colors. Men approached her more often in one hair-color condition, while ratings of attractiveness and attributed traits also changed across conditions. The person's actual intelligence, competence, or personality had not changed; observers' judgments had.
That distinction is the foundation for interpreting hair color responsibly. If the same person is judged differently after a color change, the experiment demonstrates something about perception. It does not demonstrate that hair color created a new personality or revealed a hidden disorder.
For the broader evidence on that distinction, see Does Hair Color Affect Personality? What Research Actually Shows.
What Dyed Hair May Mean Psychologically
People choose hair colors for many reasons, and one person's reason cannot be safely inferred from another person's appearance. A change may be aesthetic, practical, social, identity-related, experimental, or emotionally meaningful. Several motives can operate at the same time.
A 2026 study of college students examined motives for hair-color selection and identified factors described as image and harmony, trend and self-expression, and psychological and emotional motives. The study also reported associations among these motives, appearance satisfaction, and self-esteem. The KCI-indexed study is useful because it treats hair choice as a multidimensional behavior rather than a psychiatric label.
Its limits are equally important. It was a specific college-student sample, relied on self-report, and examined associations rather than proving that changing hair color causes higher self-esteem or psychological stability. The authors' statistical findings cannot be generalized into a rule that a certain color means a certain emotional state.
Evidence status: preliminary to limited evidence. Hair-color choices can be connected to self-expression, appearance satisfaction, and emotional motives in some samples. There is no validated one-to-one translation from a visible hair color to a person's mental-health status.
Why a Hair Change During Distress Does Not Automatically Become a Symptom
People sometimes change their appearance during breakups, stressful periods, identity transitions, new jobs, celebrations, grief, recovery, or simple boredom. The timing can make the change feel psychologically meaningful. Timing alone does not identify the mechanism.
A popular explanation says that someone dyes their hair after a breakup or emotional crisis “to regain control.” That is a plausible interpretation for some people, especially when the person themselves describes the change that way. Direct evidence for a universal breakup-to-hair-dye control mechanism is limited. The claim should therefore remain a possible personal explanation, not a psychological law.
For the breakup-specific evidence review, see Why Do People Dye Their Hair After a Breakup? Psychology, Identity, and Control. It distinguishes identity transition and possible agency from the unsupported claim that post-breakup hair dye is a universal control-restoration mechanism.
The same caution applies to the phrase “mental breakdown hair.” A dramatic appearance change can happen during a difficult period, after it, before it, or with no mental-health crisis at all. Without evidence about symptoms, duration, impairment, history, and context, the appearance change does not tell us which explanation applies.
Evidence status: plausible interpretation for individual cases when supported by the person's own account; limited direct evidence as a general mechanism.
Does Blue, Pink, Green, or Purple Hair Indicate Mental Illness?
No specific unnatural hair color is a validated indicator of mental illness. Blue, pink, green, purple, neon, pastel, split-dye, rainbow, and other non-natural colors can be forms of aesthetics, fashion, subcultural participation, experimentation, identity expression, or self-presentation. None of those meanings is a diagnosis.
The 2022 OKCupid study did not establish separate diagnostic meanings for blue versus pink versus green versus purple hair. Its hair variable was a broad yes/no history of having dyed one's hair an unnatural color. Turning that measure into claims such as “blue hair means depression” or “pink hair signals borderline personality disorder” adds information that the study did not test.
This is also where stereotypes can become harmful. Once a visible style is treated as evidence of instability, observers may interpret ordinary disagreement, emotion, or nonconformity through that stereotype. The result is appearance-based attribution, not clinical assessment.
Evidence status: claims that particular unnatural colors reveal a disorder are popular/internet claims, not established diagnostic evidence.
Does Dyeing Hair Mean Someone Is Depressed?
No. Dyeing hair is not a depression symptom by itself, and a person with dyed hair should not be assumed to have depression. Depression diagnosis requires a sustained symptom pattern and clinically relevant distress or impairment, not an appearance choice.
A person who is depressed may dye their hair. A person who is not depressed may dye their hair. A person may even say that a color change helped them mark a transition, feel more like themselves, or enjoy novelty. Those statements describe personal experience. They do not make hair dye a depression marker.
If the concern is genuinely about depression, the informative questions involve mood, loss of interest, sleep, appetite, energy, concentration, hopelessness, functioning, duration, and safety. Hair color is not a substitute for those questions.
Does a Sudden Hair-Color Change Mean Mania or Bipolar Disorder?
No. A sudden hair-color change does not diagnose mania or bipolar disorder.
During a manic or hypomanic episode, behavior and activity can change markedly. The clinically relevant pattern involves mood and energy changes plus characteristic symptoms such as decreased need for sleep, increased activity, rapid speech, racing thoughts, or unusually elevated or irritable mood. NIMH's bipolar-disorder guidance emphasizes the severity, length, and frequency of the full symptom pattern across a person's history. A coincidental appearance change does not become diagnostic simply because it occurs during the same period.
A new hair color could occur alongside such an episode, just as buying clothes, redecorating a room, starting projects, or traveling could. The color does not become a diagnostic criterion simply because it occurred at the same time.
Evidence status: established clinical principle. Appearance change alone is not sufficient for a bipolar diagnosis.
Can Hair Color Reveal Trauma or PTSD?
No. PTSD is diagnosed from a defined pattern of symptoms following trauma, including re-experiencing, avoidance, changes in arousal and reactivity, and changes in cognition and mood, with duration and functional impact considered. Hair color is not part of the diagnostic criteria.
Someone may change their appearance after a traumatic event and may personally experience that change as reclaiming identity, marking survival, creating distance from an earlier self, or simply trying something new. Those meanings should come from the person, not from an observer assigning a trauma narrative to their hair.
Evidence status: hair-color-based trauma inference is unsupported. Individual appearance changes may have personal meaning, but personal meaning is not a PTSD screen.
Can Hair Color Reveal Borderline Personality Disorder?
No. Borderline personality disorder cannot be diagnosed from bright hair, frequent hair changes, tattoos, piercings, clothing, or any other single visible style choice.
NIMH describes diagnosis as a thorough assessment of symptoms and personal and family history. The disorder involves enduring patterns affecting emotion regulation, self-image, relationships, and behavior. The fact that identity disturbance can occur in borderline personality disorder does not mean that visible identity experimentation identifies the disorder. The reasoning cannot be reversed.
Someone can change hair color frequently without having borderline personality disorder, and someone with borderline personality disorder may never dye their hair at all. A visible style has neither the specificity nor the clinical validation needed for diagnosis.
Evidence status: established clinical principle; color-based BPD claims are unsupported diagnostic inference.
Can Hair Color Reveal ADHD or Autism?
No. Hair color is not a diagnostic marker for ADHD or autism.
ADHD is a neurodevelopmental disorder assessed through persistent patterns of inattention and/or hyperactivity-impulsivity, childhood onset, presence across settings, and functional impairment. Autism diagnosis relies on developmental history and observed behavior against standardized criteria. Neither condition is identified by hair pigmentation or dye choice.
Some neurodivergent people may use appearance in ways that are personally meaningful, just as non-neurodivergent people do. That statement does not create a diagnostic link between hair color and neurodevelopmental status.
Evidence status: established diagnostic principle. Hair color provides no validated basis for inferring ADHD or autism.
What About Hair Cortisol, Drug Testing, or Other Tests That Use Hair?
“Hair can be used in a test” is not the same claim as “hair color reveals mental health.” Laboratory assays can analyze substances incorporated into hair shafts. Researchers have also studied hair cortisol concentration as a possible biomarker of longer-term hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal activity. Those methods analyze material in hair; they do not diagnose a person by looking at whether the hair is blonde, brunette, red, blue, or pink.
This distinction matters because search results sometimes mix visual hair-color claims with laboratory hair analysis. A biochemical assay and an appearance-based inference are fundamentally different measurement methods.
Why People Overread Hair Color
Humans form impressions quickly from visible cues. Hair color is salient, easy to categorize, and culturally loaded. Once a stereotype is familiar, an observer can notice examples that fit it and overlook examples that do not.
Hair-color research has repeatedly shown that observers can attribute different characteristics to otherwise similar targets. That is precisely why appearance is a poor shortcut for diagnosis: the judgment may reflect the observer's learned associations as much as anything about the person being judged.
In clinical reasoning, the direction of inference matters. A clinician starts with reported experiences, observed behavior, duration, impairment, developmental or medical history, and standardized criteria. An appearance stereotype starts with a visible cue and jumps directly to an internal state. Those are not equivalent methods.
How to Interpret a Hair Change Without Diagnosing From Appearance
If a hair change makes you wonder whether someone is struggling, the useful response is to focus on the person's actual experience rather than the color.
Ask what the change means to them, if anything. Notice whether they themselves report persistent sadness, extreme shifts in mood or energy, severe anxiety, trauma symptoms, sleep disruption, functional impairment, or other difficulties. Look for patterns over time rather than treating one aesthetic decision as a clinical clue. If the person wants help, encourage assessment based on symptoms and functioning.
If you are interpreting your own hair change, the same rule applies. You do not need to decode the color. Ask what motivated the change, how you have been feeling, whether your sleep and functioning have changed, and whether distress is persistent or impairing. The answer may be “I liked the color,” and that is a complete psychological explanation.
Evidence Map: What Is Strong, What Is Limited, and What Is a Myth?
Established evidence: Depression, bipolar disorder, PTSD, borderline personality disorder, ADHD, and autism are diagnosed from condition-specific patterns of symptoms, development, duration, impairment, history, and professional assessment. Hair color is not a diagnostic criterion.
Reasonably supported evidence: Hair color can influence first impressions, stereotypes, and attributed traits in some social-perception studies. These effects concern observers' judgments, not proof of the target person's inner traits.
Limited evidence: A 2022 observational analysis of OKCupid data found associations between a history of unnatural hair dye and several self-reported mental-health variables. Its measures were not clinical diagnostic instruments, predictive performance was weak, and the design cannot establish causation.
Limited and context-dependent evidence: Natural pigmentation has been associated with selected behavioral or health variables in some studies, including a small toddler study and a larger Central European survey. Confounding, population specificity, measurement choices, and weak individual prediction prevent diagnostic use.
Preliminary evidence: A 2026 college-student study linked hair-color selection motives with appearance satisfaction and self-esteem. It supports studying hair choice as self-presentation and appearance psychology, not as a mental-health diagnosis.
Plausible interpretation: A person may change hair during an emotionally significant transition because the change feels agentic, expressive, novel, symbolic, or identity-relevant. Direct evidence for a universal mechanism is limited, so the meaning should come from the individual.
Popular/internet claim: “Bright hair means mental illness,” “blue hair means depression,” “pink hair means borderline personality disorder,” or “dyeing hair after a breakup proves someone is having a breakdown.” These claims exceed the evidence.
What the Evidence Does Not Show
The current evidence does not show that natural hair color determines depression, anxiety, trauma history, bipolar disorder, personality disorder, ADHD, autism, intelligence, morality, or emotional stability.
It does not show that dyed hair causes mental illness.
It does not show that mental illness causes people to choose a particular color.
It does not show that a clinician can screen for psychiatric conditions by looking at hair.
It does not justify treating people with bright or unconventional hair as less stable, less competent, or more disordered.
It does show why hair is an interesting psychological cue: appearance can carry personal meaning and can change social perception. Those are valuable questions in their own right, and they become clearer when they are kept separate from diagnosis.
FAQ
Can your hair color tell someone about your mental health?
No. Hair color is not a validated mental-health test. It may affect other people's assumptions or reflect an individual's chosen self-presentation, but it cannot establish a diagnosis.
Is colored hair a sign of mental illness?
No. Natural or dyed hair color by itself is not a sign that establishes mental illness. A 2022 observational study reported correlations between a history of unnatural hair dye and some self-reported mental-health variables, but the measures were weak for individual prediction and were not diagnostic.
Why do some people dye their hair when they are sad?
There is no single established reason. A person may want novelty, self-expression, a visible transition, aesthetic change, social belonging, or a sense of agency. If sadness is part of the person's own explanation, that is personal context rather than a universal mechanism. For the broader evidence on hair-dye motives, see Why Do People Dye Their Hair? Psychology of Identity, Self-Expression, and Control.
Does blue hair mean depression?
No. There is no validated rule linking blue hair to depression. Research that grouped all “unnatural” hair colors together cannot establish a specific psychological meaning for blue hair.
Does bright hair mean borderline personality disorder?
No. Borderline personality disorder is diagnosed through a clinical assessment of enduring patterns of symptoms and functioning. Bright hair is not a diagnostic criterion.
Is changing hair color a sign of mania?
Not by itself. Mania involves a broader episode-level pattern of mood, energy, activity, sleep, thinking, speech, and behavior. A hair change may occur during the same period, but it is not sufficient to identify mania.
Can hair color show trauma?
No. Hair color cannot establish whether someone has experienced trauma or has PTSD. A person may attach symbolic meaning to an appearance change after difficult events, but observers should not infer trauma from the color.
Can hair color indicate ADHD or autism?
No. ADHD and autism are neurodevelopmental conditions assessed through developmental and behavioral criteria. Hair color is not a validated indicator of either condition.
Can natural red or blonde hair be associated with psychological traits?
Some studies have reported narrow statistical associations in specific samples, such as behavioral inhibition in 101 German toddlers or health variables in Central European adults. These findings are not diagnostic rules and may be affected by confounding, sample characteristics, and measurement limitations.
Can a therapist diagnose someone from their appearance?
A clinician can observe appearance as part of the broader context of an assessment, but diagnosis requires condition-specific evidence about symptoms, duration, impairment, history, and differential explanations. Hair color alone cannot provide that evidence.
Bottom Line
Hair color may tell you that a person has a particular pigmentation phenotype or has chosen a particular appearance. It may influence stereotypes, first impressions, and social reactions. It may also carry private meaning for the person who chose it.
Hair color does not reveal a clinical diagnosis. The scientifically defensible question is not “What disorder does this color mean?” but “What evidence do we actually have about this person's symptoms, functioning, history, and own explanation?” That shift replaces appearance-based inference with psychological evidence.
For nonclinical questions about vivid hair as self-expression, identity, and social perception, see Unnatural Hair Colors and Psychology: Self-Expression, Identity, and Social Perception. Hair color can be personally meaningful without functioning as a mental-health indicator.
For adjacent evidence and intent boundaries, see Does Hair Color Affect Personality? What Research Actually Shows, Why Do People Dye Their Hair? Psychology of Identity, Self-Expression, and Control, Why Do People Dye Their Hair After a Breakup? Psychology, Identity, and Control, Unnatural Hair Colors and Psychology: Self-Expression, Identity, and Social Perception, and Is Unnatural Hair Color Unprofessional? Workplace Bias, Hiring, and Self-Expression.
For adjacent evidence and intent boundaries, see Does Hair Color Affect Personality? What Research Actually Shows, Why Do People Dye Their Hair? Psychology of Identity, Self-Expression, and Control, Why Do People Dye Their Hair After a Breakup? Psychology, Identity, and Control, Unnatural Hair Colors and Psychology: Self-Expression, Identity, and Social Perception, and Is Unnatural Hair Color Unprofessional? Workplace Bias, Hiring, and Self-Expression.
Related Articles
References
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2025). Clinical testing and diagnosis for autism spectrum disorder. https://www.cdc.gov/autism/hcp/diagnosis/index.html
Dutton, E., & Kirkegaard, E. O. W. (2022). Blue hair and the blues: Dying your hair unnatural colours is associated with depression. Psychreg Journal of Psychology, 6(2), 26–35. https://www.pjp.psychreg.org/wp-content/uploads/6-2-edward-dutton-blue_hair_blues_26-35.pdf
Flegr, J., & Sýkorová, K. (2019). Skin fairness is a better predictor for impaired physical and mental health than hair redness. Scientific Reports, 9, 18138. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54662-5
Kong, C. S. (2026). A study on the impact of hair color selection motives on appearance satisfaction and self-esteem. Journal of the Korean Society of Beauty and Art, 27(1), 249–259. https://doi.org/10.18693/jksba.2026.27.1.249
Lawson, E. D. (1971). Hair color, personality, and the observer. Psychological Reports, 28(1), 311–322. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1971.28.1.311
MedlinePlus Genetics. (n.d.). Is hair color determined by genetics? U.S. National Library of Medicine. https://medlineplus.gov/genetics/understanding/traits/haircolor/
Moehler, E., Kagan, J., Brunner, R., Wiebel, A., Kaufmann, C., & Resch, F. (2006). Association of behavioral inhibition with hair pigmentation in a European sample. Biological Psychology, 72(3), 344–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.12.001
National Institute of Mental Health. (n.d.). Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: What you need to know. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/attention-deficit-hyperactivity-disorder-what-you-need-to-know
National Institute of Mental Health. (n.d.). Bipolar disorder. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/bipolar-disorder
National Institute of Mental Health. (n.d.). Borderline personality disorder. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/borderline-personality-disorder
National Institute of Mental Health. (n.d.). Depression. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/depression
National Institute of Mental Health. (n.d.). Post-traumatic stress disorder. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/post-traumatic-stress-disorder-ptsd
Swami, V., & Barrett, S. (2011). British men's hair color preferences: An assessment of courtship solicitation and stimulus ratings. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 52(6), 595–600. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2011.00911.x