Can Big Five Personality Traits Change? Evidence Across the Lifespan

6 days ago

20 min read

Author: Ukrainian Psychological Hub · Published: October 9, 2026 · Editorial Policy

Yes. Big Five personality traits can change throughout life. Longitudinal studies demonstrate that people can retain recognizable, relatively stable patterns while gradually changing their typical ways of thinking, feeling, and behaving. Development differs across traits, age groups, individuals, and circumstances. Controlled studies also show that some intentionally designed interventions can produce measurable changes on personality assessments. The strongest evidence is neither a promise of unlimited personal reinvention nor a fixed-age theory: personality has both continuity and developmental plasticity. See the 2022 lifespan meta-analysis and the 2026 individual-change meta-analysis.

What makes this question complicated is that 'change' can mean several things. A person's score can rise as an entire population changes, a person's position relative to peers can change, an underlying disposition can develop, or a temporary situation can alter how they answer a questionnaire. Those are related but distinct findings. This guide examines the evidence across childhood, adolescence, adulthood, and aging; distinguishes naturally occurring development from life-event associations and interventions; and explains how to recognize the limits of trait measurement.

Can Big Five Personality Traits Really Change? The Evidence in Brief

Personality psychology now has decades of prospective observations rather than only snapshots of different age groups. A 2006 meta-analysis documented systematic changes in average traits across the life course. A 2022 meta-analysis combined 189 sets of longitudinal rank-order evidence with 276 sets of mean-level evidence and found both substantial continuity and meaningful changes. A 2026 meta-analysis assembled 229 longitudinal studies involving 230,492 participants and found substantial individual variation in change across the lifespan.

An important practical consequence follows. If people in one cohort become more conscientious on average, this does not guarantee that an individual member becomes more conscientious. And if individuals tend to preserve their ranking relative to one another, it remains possible for their absolute levels to change together. Statistical findings at the group level describe tendencies and distributions, not the personal destiny of the reader.

First, Define What Is Changing

The Big Five personality traits are Openness to Experience, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism. Each is a continuous dimension describing an enduring tendency rather than a category that assigns one personality type. Five-Factor Model terminology overlaps closely with Big Five terminology, although the research traditions and particular instruments are not identical in every respect. Each individual has a position on all five dimensions. For a structural explanation, see domains, aspects, and facets.

Rank-order stability and change

Rank-order stability means that people maintain much of their relative standing compared with other people. If a person scores relatively high in Extraversion at 25 and still scores relatively high compared with peers at 45, that is evidence of rank-order continuity. The average level of Extraversion across their cohort could still rise or fall in the meantime. An older quantitative review of 152 studies found that rank-order consistency increases considerably from childhood into adult life. Longer intervals ordinarily pose a harder test of continuity than shorter intervals.

Mean-level development

Mean-level change asks whether an entire sample's average score rises or declines between measurement occasions. Studies can report increased average Conscientiousness, changing Extraversion-related tendencies, or shifts in emotional stability across particular adult ages. These findings may describe genuine development, but their magnitude depends on the participants, assessment periods, instruments, and age distribution. Equal average scores at two times can also conceal sizable increases for some participants and decreases for others.

Individual trajectories

A person's own trajectory may diverge from the typical age pattern. The 2026 lifespan synthesis specifically evaluated how much change varies between individuals, finding significant heterogeneity across domains and life stages. Variation was especially pronounced in childhood, but it remained substantial at later ages. An apparent 'average person' in a graph is a statistical construct, not a calendar of changes that every adult follows.

Traits, facets, states, skills, and scores

Trait refers to a comparatively enduring pattern across time and situations; state refers to momentary or context-dependent expression. An introverted individual can socialize enthusiastically at a party; a usually calm person can feel anxiety during an emergency. Learning a presentation skill, developing a habit, or feeling different one week may or may not translate into a lasting trait shift. Similarly, a changed test result can arise from response style, error, questionnaire choice, or altered norms. Narrow facets can also change differently from their broader parent domain. The BFI-2 has fifteen instrument-specific facets, while NEO and Big Five Aspect Scales use different subdivisions. There is no single universal Big Five facet list. The BFI-2 validation paper illustrates why these distinctions matter.

Does Personality Stop Changing at Age 30?

No. The popular claim that personality becomes fixed at 30 does not reflect the modern longitudinal evidence. Personality typically becomes more consistent in relative rank from childhood through young adulthood. The 2022 meta-analysis suggests that rank-order stability plateaus by early adulthood, with limited additional growth after approximately age 25. A plateau in relative consistency is not a claim that people stop changing their own scores or behaviors. Patterns within individuals continue to vary.

The traditional image of a completely finished adult personality is further challenged by studies of mean-level change during middle adulthood and into old age, as well as by clinical and nonclinical intervention studies. Roberts and Mroczek's overview reviews trait change in adulthood and explains why stability and malleability can coexist. An adult may remain recognizably themselves while becoming more organized, less reactive, more socially assertive, or more selective about novelty.

Big Five Personality Change Across the Lifespan

Childhood: formative differences and developmental flexibility

Children display early differences in emotionality, approach and avoidance, activity, sociability, and self-regulation. Over childhood, cognitive growth, language, school contexts, friendships, and increasing autonomy affect how these tendencies are expressed and measured. The most pronounced variation in individual change trajectories appears in childhood in the 2026 meta-analysis. Child personality assessments require developmentally suitable instruments; simply administering an adult inventory and treating its domain scores as precise developmental facts would be unsound.

Some characteristics retain a recognizable thread across time, but early personality does not set a mechanical ceiling for later development. Children differ in developmental timing and the experiences available to them. Parenting, schooling, economic security, and peer contexts can all be relevant, yet identifying their causal effects is more difficult than finding associations.

Adolescence: new roles, contexts, and self-understanding

Adolescence changes the settings in which personality is expressed. Increased autonomy, peer relationships, education, identity exploration, and emotion regulation all become salient. Self-reports may also change because young people acquire better language for describing themselves and revise how they interpret assessment items. A teenage profile therefore benefits from age-appropriate repeated assessment and attention to circumstances. Variability during these years is not an indication of an unstable or defective person.

Emerging and young adulthood: common but varied shifts

Transitions to independent work, higher education, partnerships, and other sustained roles can coincide with increases in socially responsible or self-regulated behaviors. The term 'maturity principle' describes common average increases in certain socially desirable tendencies, particularly Conscientiousness and emotional stability. The 2006 meta-analysis reported broad lifespan patterns, while the 2022 update estimated smaller cumulative mean-level shifts than some earlier research suggested. The developmental averages neither imply that every individual follows the trend nor establish that the life transitions caused it.

Middle adulthood: consistency with continued opportunities for change

Many adults display strong rank-order stability. Personality remains an informative summary of typical behavior across years, but family life, chronic responsibilities, career changes, health, values, and relationships provide recurring contexts in which patterns can develop. A study of adult domains and facets showed that trajectories may differ by level of analysis. Domain-wide scores can obscure developments within specific aspects of sociability, self-discipline, curiosity, or interpersonal functioning.

Older adulthood: a more complex picture

Later adulthood is a distinct developmental period rather than a flat extension of middle life. A coordinated analysis of 16 longitudinal samples, representing more than 60,000 participants, identified important age-related differences and variability across studies. Several average trait levels may decline in older ages, and Neuroticism may increase in some samples, although patterns differ by cohort, instrument, sample retention, and health. Selection matters: participants experiencing significant illness or decline may be underrepresented in later waves. No one should infer a particular older person's trait trajectory from an average lifespan curve.

How Each of the Five Personality Domains Can Change

Openness to Experience

Openness concerns tendencies toward curiosity, intellectual and aesthetic engagement, imagination, and interest in new experiences. Some longitudinal samples find decreasing average openness in later life, while different facets and individuals can move differently. New interests and activities may develop openness-related behaviors; a single change in hobby or cultural preference does not demonstrate a measurable broad-domain shift. See the separate Openness to Experience guide for the definition.

Conscientiousness

Conscientiousness concerns organization, deliberation, responsibility, perseverance, and related self-regulation tendencies. Group-average levels often increase in young adulthood; later trajectories vary. Practicing planning or time management can improve useful skills, but a new calendar habit alone is not proof that the broader disposition has changed. The construct itself is explained in Conscientiousness in the Big Five.

Extraversion

Extraversion includes tendencies toward social engagement, assertiveness, energetic activity, and positive emotionality, with subdimensions dependent on the instrument. Becoming more willing to initiate conversations can reflect new skills, new social opportunities, or developmental change. A person who seeks fewer social events later in life has not automatically become less capable or less happy. The dedicated Extraversion article addresses the domain.

Agreeableness

Agreeableness captures tendencies linked with interpersonal cooperation, concern for others, respect, and conflict management. Average levels can change across adulthood, but people differ, and narrower facets may have distinct developmental paths. Improved conflict-resolution skills are valuable whether or not all agreeableness-related facets shift together. See Agreeableness in the Big Five.

Neuroticism and emotional stability

Neuroticism is related to proneness toward negative emotional reactions; emotional stability commonly describes the opposite direction of the continuum. Average emotional stability often increases over parts of adulthood, but later-life and individual patterns remain diverse. Clinical symptoms and enduring traits require distinct interpretations. The full definition, measurement, facets, and Neuroticism-specific developmental and health questions belong to the existing Neuroticism canonical hub, which this article references without duplicating.

Instrumentation matters for naming: the BFI-2 calls its corresponding domain Negative Emotionality, and its facets are defined within that specific measure. The names and scores of the BFI-2, NEO, and other instruments should not be substituted mechanically for one another.

What the Major Longitudinal Meta-Analyses Establish

The development evidence should be read as a collection of complementary answers rather than a contest over a single numerical stability score. The Roberts and DelVecchio 2000 review assembled rank-order coefficients and documented greater consistency from childhood into adult life. The Roberts, Walton, and Viechtbauer 2006 review asked how average trait levels change. The 2022 Psychological Bulletin synthesis revised some developmental estimates with much broader evidence. The 2026 meta-analysis focused on differences in people's changes, establishing variation that an average curve cannot show.

Differences in findings do not necessarily indicate that the studies contradict one another. A population can become more organized on average while retaining most of its rank order. Some participants can change dramatically while others remain almost unchanged. A short observation interval may yield high stability correlations that weaken over longer periods. Each conclusion has a defined comparison, time scale, and statistical target.

A separate coordinated analysis of 16 samples studied adults using broadly comparable modeling methods while retaining differences between datasets. It demonstrated that the participant ages, countries, questionnaires, and time intervals affect the resulting trajectories. There is consequently no scientifically justified formula specifying how much of each person's personality must change per decade.

Do Major Life Events Change Personality?

Life events can coincide with shifts in recurring behavior and psychological circumstances, but they do not operate as universal personality switches. Research must consider selection effects: people with certain existing dispositions may be more likely to enter some relationships, jobs, or other situations. It must also consider anticipation, changes in resources, chronic stress, and other simultaneous events. Observational association with a life event by itself does not establish what the event caused.

The 2024 systematic review and meta-analysis analyzed 44 studies, 89 samples, and 121,187 participants and found generally small event-related changes, with somewhat more consistent associations for work-related events than for relationship events. A 2026 coordinated data analysis across seven panels and 196,256 participants similarly identified several small average associations. Estimates averaged roughly 0.06 in standardized units. Those effects are informative scientifically and weak as forecasts of individual transformation.

Starting work, changing careers, and losing employment

A new job can bring recurring expectations around punctuality, collaboration, emotional regulation, and persistence. Research has found small average increases in Conscientiousness and emotional stability in some groups entering work. Other individuals may experience insecurity, depletion, or little detectable trait development. Working conditions, selection into employment, and previous behavior all complicate the causal story. Career transitions are opportunities for changing habits and contexts, not guaranteed personality interventions.

Marriage, close relationships, and parenthood

Long-term partnerships and caregiving change daily routines, interpersonal feedback, and responsibilities. Their personality associations can be small or inconsistent. The 2026 panel analysis reported an average decline in Openness associated with marriage in its studied samples, but this does not mean that marriage reliably reduces intellectual curiosity or creativity for a given couple. Relationship quality, prior dispositions, changing life circumstances, and social context matter.

Divorce, loss, illness, and adversity

Adverse events can alter mood, behavior, social opportunity, and self-perception in the short term; some people may also show longer-lasting changes. Trauma exposure, bereavement, and medical conditions have no single predetermined Big Five outcome. In periods of distress, state-related responses on a questionnaire may resemble trait change. Clinical symptoms, medical care, and functional difficulties need separate, appropriate consideration. The absence of a simple trait trajectory does not minimize the reality of an individual's experience.

Why Can Personality Change? Genetic, Environmental, and Behavioral Pathways

Genetic differences contribute to individual differences in personality, and genetic influences do not mean that a trait is fixed or that an individual has a predetermined score. Heritability describes variation within a particular population in a particular environment; it does not assign a fixed genetic fraction to one person's behavior. Environmental conditions, opportunities, constraints, relationships, and habits interact with dispositions across development.

People also shape their environments. Someone who enjoys social interaction may seek more groups; someone who likes routine may choose predictable activities. Recurring environments then supply experiences that can reinforce established tendencies or create new demands. These reciprocal processes help explain both continuity and change. The 2026 synthesis of individual differences makes clear why variation in changing trajectories cannot be captured by an unchanging individual set point.

The TESSERA framework and repeated everyday situations

The TESSERA framework proposes that personality development can emerge through recurring short-term sequences involving triggering situations, expectancies, states and state expressions, and reactions. When related experiences recur and people reflect on them, small shifts may accumulate. The framework offers a mechanism-oriented account, not a validated guarantee that any specified habit will transform a broad personality domain.

Consider an individual repeatedly practicing direct but respectful communication. Initially, assertive conversation may require deliberate effort. Across many situations, changed expectations, competence, and interpersonal feedback may support a more enduring pattern. It is still necessary to establish that the tendency generalizes beyond practiced conversations and persists without ongoing prompts. An improved skill and a measurable domain-level trait shift can both be valuable, but they are distinct research outcomes.

Can You Deliberately Change Your Big Five Personality?

Some personality characteristics can change through intentional effort, particularly when goals are translated into structured actions. Controlled trials provide stronger evidence for this than inspirational personal stories. At the same time, motivation, environment, choice of outcome, and whether changes last require careful evaluation. Wanting to be different does not, by itself, demonstrate a durable difference.

Volitional change experiments

In two sixteen-week experiments, Hudson and Fraley investigated participants' goals for personality change and tested methods for pursuing those goals. Participants' goals were related to self-reported trait change, and some structured implementation-intention techniques were more helpful than other tested approaches. The effects were not uniformly strong across methods. The research supports testing concrete behavioral strategies rather than assuming that personality can change simply through wishing.

The three-month smartphone-supported intervention

A randomized controlled trial reported in PNAS in 2021 recruited 1,523 nonclinical participants and tested a structured digital personality change intervention over three months. Compared with a waitlist control, participants showed greater desired-direction self-reported changes. Informants also detected certain changes, although these were generally smaller. Some self-reported changes persisted at a three-month post-program follow-up. These findings establish that a particular research intervention can influence measured traits under specified conditions; they do not establish lifelong transformation or effectiveness for all personality apps.

The digital delivery channel should not be confused with evidence for AI personality profiling or a general-purpose conversational chatbot. Each intervention's behavior-change components, outcome measures, comparator, selection criteria, and follow-up must be evaluated independently.

Psychotherapy and broader intervention evidence

A 2017 meta-analysis of 207 intervention studies found average personality-measure changes of about 0.37 standard deviations over approximately 24 weeks, with the most prominent average changes in emotional stability-related outcomes and then Extraversion. Study designs included different treatments, populations, and measures; estimates from uncontrolled before-and-after studies carry different causal implications from randomized comparisons. Symptom reduction and trait change may overlap, so researchers should not equate the two automatically.

Therapy is selected for personal or clinical needs rather than because a Big Five score is 'bad.' Neither elevated Neuroticism nor low Extraversion is a psychiatric diagnosis. A professional assessment, when relevant, interprets symptoms, functioning, history, and context separately from personality-trait questionnaires.

How Long Does Lasting Personality Change Take?

No universal timeline has been established. Temporary emotions and social behaviors shift within minutes or hours; skills and routines can be practiced across weeks; experimental personality interventions have reported differences after several months; and longitudinal studies detect developmental trends across years or decades. The 2017 intervention review and 2021 randomized trial supply observed study intervals, not a rule that everyone can permanently change any desired trait within a fixed number of days.

Durability is an additional question. A self-report collected immediately after a course is more vulnerable to expectancy, recall, and temporary motivation than a pattern supported by sustained behavioral evidence and follow-up months or years later. An improvement in daily functioning can matter even when researchers cannot yet tell whether it represents a permanent broad trait shift.

Practical Ways to Work Toward Desired Personality Development

Start with a meaningful behavior rather than a personality label

A useful goal identifies an action that matters to everyday functioning: following through on a plan, addressing conflict constructively, trying unfamiliar experiences, or making social contact when desired. It does not require adopting a new personality type. Different levels of a domain may serve different preferences and contexts; an extremely high score is not inherently better than a moderate one.

Create a repeatable plan

Select a recurring situation and a feasible response. For example: 'When I finish work, I will identify tomorrow's three main tasks'; 'When an important disagreement begins, I will ask one clarifying question before responding'; or 'Twice a month I will try a new local activity that genuinely interests me.' These examples are behavioral options, not validated treatments or evidence that a particular amount of trait change will occur.

Practice in multiple settings and seek appropriate feedback

Changing a behavior only when prompted by a phone app may reflect compliance rather than a generalized disposition. Carrying a new habit into different relevant settings, noticing obstacles, and obtaining feedback from trusted observers when appropriate can help assess whether a pattern is becoming more typical. Since relationships and opportunities affect practice, realistic goals should account for time, health, safety, and resources.

Reevaluate the target rather than chase a score

The objective is improved behavior or functioning aligned with the person's values. A test result can be one source of evidence, but the meaningful outcome may instead be more manageable routines, improved communication, or reduced distress. A person who enjoys solitude need not try to maximize Extraversion. Someone who values spontaneity need not seek the highest possible Conscientiousness percentile.

Can Big Five Test Scores Change Without Real Trait Change?

Absolutely. Scores may differ across occasions because of random measurement error, daily mood, fatigue, stress, changes in response style, item interpretation, scoring procedures, or the reference group. A genuine lasting trait change is only one explanation. For this reason, the question 'Can my result change if I retake the test?' is separate from the question 'Can my personality develop?'

A 12-year study of Mexican-origin adults illustrates a particularly important issue: apparent changes in mean-level traits were sensitive to time-varying acquiescent responding, and some declines disappeared when that response tendency was taken into account. A German longitudinal study investigated measurement properties while examining adult personality development. For meaningful comparisons, researchers consider whether the same instrument measures a construct equivalently across time, age, and relevant groups.

Percentiles also depend on normative samples; a different age or population norm can change a relative score without changing the person's behavior. Different questionnaires do not share universally equivalent items, facets, scores, or thresholds. There are no universal Big Five cutoffs for 'high' and 'low'; any such interpretation requires the actual test's valid reference frame. Consult Big Five Test Scores and Percentiles and the Big Five Inventory guide for instrument-specific interpretation.

How Researchers Separate Trait Change From Temporary States

Good longitudinal research uses repeated observations, thoughtful intervals, suitable measures, and sometimes reports from people who know the participant. It asks whether changes are persistent, generalize across appropriate contexts, and remain credible after accounting for response styles and measurement invariance. Randomized intervention studies can evaluate whether a particular program caused a difference between treated and control groups under the trial's conditions. They still must establish what exactly the difference represents and how long it lasts.

There are meaningful intermediate outcomes. A person may learn stronger emotion-regulation skills without much movement in a broad Neuroticism score. They may become comfortable giving presentations without changing their full Extraversion domain. These achievements should be valued according to their benefits, while scientific claims stay connected to the precise outcome that was measured.

Personality Traits Are Not Diagnoses or Deterministic Forecasts

A high or low score expresses a relative standing on a continuous dimension. It does not assign a mental illness, personality disorder, intelligence level, morality score, or permanent destiny. A trait correlating with mental health or life outcomes within a sample cannot diagnose a condition or establish what will happen to a specific person. Screening instruments, clinical diagnoses, and broad trait assessments answer different questions.

This matters particularly when a person wants to change after distressing experiences. A temporary increase in anxiety or depressed mood is not automatically a broad change in Neuroticism; likewise, improvement after treatment does not have to be redescribed as personality transformation. Specific clinical concerns deserve evaluation on clinical grounds, independently of a Big Five profile.

Scientific Limitations and Unanswered Questions

Longitudinal association is not necessarily causation

Even large prospective datasets cannot fully rule out selection and confounding when examining jobs, relationships, parenting, or life events. Randomized interventions support more direct causal claims about the tested program, while often having narrower participant groups and shorter follow-up. The distinction should remain explicit whenever an observed association is used to discuss a possible mechanism.

Results are sensitive to instrument and level of analysis

A broad domain score can remain fairly stable while a narrower facet changes; two measures may use overlapping but distinct item pools or facet definitions. Sensitivity to change, informant agreement, age suitability, reliability, and longitudinal measurement invariance all affect interpretation. Generic psychometric principles have their own scientific domain; their specific relevance here is whether observed Big Five scores support the developmental inference.

Cross-cultural generalization needs independent evidence

Substantial research supports the Big Five in many languages and settings, but not every lexical study reproduces the same five-factor structure, and many longitudinal samples come from relatively affluent Western societies. A 2026 study from Kenya, Namibia, and South Africa explored Agency and Communion, broader Big Two dimensions, and documented developmental patterns partly distinct from those often described in Western personality research. It is evidence for cross-cultural developmental diversity, not proof that the Big Five has identical factor structure in all languages.

Group-average trends never give a precise personal forecast

An average event-related change of around 0.06 standardized units is not a prediction that your personality will move by that amount. Individuals vary in baseline traits, contexts, experiences, ages, opportunities, and reactions. The 2026 meta-analysis of individual change trajectories directly supports this caution. Statements about work, relationships, well-being, aging, and health should remain probabilistic.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can personality fundamentally change?

Some people undergo substantial lasting changes in particular dispositions, while retaining many recognizable tendencies. The word 'fundamentally' lacks a standard scientifically validated threshold. Changing one domain or facet also does not mean that every aspect of the person has changed.

At what age does personality stop changing?

There is no fixed age when the Big Five becomes unchangeable. Relative stability strengthens from childhood into adulthood, but measurable individual changes can continue through old age.

Can you become more introverted or extroverted?

Extraversion-related behavior and measured tendencies can change, but preferences also fluctuate with situations, social circumstances, and demands. A shift in one week's social energy does not establish an enduring trait shift.

Can you improve Conscientiousness as an adult?

Adults can develop planning, follow-through, and organization habits, and some studies show changes on broader personality assessments following specific interventions. The durability and extent of domain-level change must be evaluated, not assumed.

Can Openness increase or decrease with age?

Yes. Average Openness sometimes decreases in older populations, while different people and narrower facets follow different trajectories. A person's age does not uniquely determine their score.

Do people become more agreeable with age?

Certain adult samples show average increases in some Agreeableness-related characteristics, but findings depend on measurement and life stage. There is no universal age-by-age pathway and no guarantee for an individual.

Can a traumatic event permanently change personality?

Major adversity can be linked with long-lasting changes in behavior or self-report, but people respond differently, and research must separate persistent trait changes from symptoms, context, and temporary states. There is no inevitable direction or magnitude.

Does psychotherapy change personality traits?

A systematic review found changes on personality measures during psychological and other interventions, particularly emotional stability-related outcomes. The causal strength, relation to symptom improvement, instrument, and follow-up differ among studies.

Can I change all five traits at the same time?

The five dimensions can each change, but available evidence does not establish a universal strategy that reliably shifts all five in desired directions. Concrete, personally meaningful behavioral goals permit clearer evaluation.

How do you tell whether a personality test change is meaningful?

Use a well-validated, appropriate measure and consistent administration, account for norms and measurement error, and look for sustained converging patterns across time and situations. A small difference between two online quiz scores alone is insufficient.

Is personality change always desirable?

No single score maximizes good functioning across all situations. Changes are best evaluated according to practical consequences, personal goals, relationships, and well-being rather than moralizing any trait.

Conclusion: Stability and Change Belong to the Same Lifespan

The Big Five measures relatively enduring dispositions that can nonetheless develop. Longitudinal meta-analyses establish meaningful continuity and average changes; newer research shows variation in individual paths; and experimental interventions show that deliberate, structured change is possible in some circumstances. The amount, timing, and meaning of change depend on the person, domain, facet, context, and measurement. Personality development remains open across the lifespan, and responsible interpretation avoids turning averages into personal predictions.

To make a sound claim about change, identify the construct, test, assessment interval, reference sample, statistical comparison, and source of evidence. A new habit, an improved skill, a changed state, a change in percentile, and a durable shift in personality can each be important, but they are measured and interpreted differently.

References

Bleidorn, W., Schwaba, T., Zheng, A., Hopwood, C. J., Sosa, S. S., Roberts, B. W., & Briley, D. A. (2022). Personality stability and change: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 148(7–8), 588–619. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000365

Bühler, J. L., Orth, U., Bleidorn, W., et al. (2024). Life events and personality change: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Personality. DOI: 10.1177/08902070231190219

Graham, E. K., et al. (2020). Trajectories of Big Five personality traits: A coordinated analysis of 16 longitudinal samples. European Journal of Personality. PubMed: 33564207

Haehner, P., et al. (2026). Individual differences in personality trait changes across the lifespan: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000525

Haehner, P., et al. (2026). Life events and personality trait change: A coordinated data analysis. European Journal of Personality. DOI: 10.1177/08902070251356148

Haehner, P., et al. (2026). Personality trait change in three sub-Saharan countries: Normative development and life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000582

Hudson, N. W., & Fraley, R. C. (2015). Volitional personality trait change: Can people choose to change their personality traits? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(3), 490–507. DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000021

Lucas, R. E., & Donnellan, M. B. (2011). Personality development across the life span: Longitudinal analyses with a national sample from Germany. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. DOI: 10.1037/a0024298

Roberts, B. W., & DelVecchio, W. F. (2000). The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 126(1), 3–25. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.1.3

Roberts, B. W., Luo, J., Briley, D. A., Chow, P. I., Su, R., & Hill, P. L. (2017). A systematic review of personality trait change through intervention. Psychological Bulletin, 143(2), 117–141. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000088

Roberts, B. W., & Mroczek, D. (2008). Personality trait change in adulthood. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(1), 31–35. PubMed: 19756219

Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 1–25. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.1

Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2017). The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(1), 117–143. DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000096

Soto, C. J., et al. (2012). Development of Big Five domains and facets in adulthood: Mean-level age trends and broadly versus narrowly acting mechanisms. Journal of Personality. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00752.x

Stieger, M., Flückiger, C., Rüegger, D., Kowatsch, T., Roberts, B. W., & Allemand, M. (2021). Changing personality traits with the help of a digital personality change intervention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(8), e2017548118. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2017548118

Wrzus, C., & Roberts, B. W. (2017). Processes of personality development in adulthood: The TESSERA framework. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21(3), 253–277. DOI: 10.1177/1088868316652279

Psychological Encyclopedia