Autism in Older Adults: Recognition, Aging, and Support

Author: Angela Bogdanova · Published: October 18, 2026 · Editorial Policy

Research cluster: Cluster Autism and Adult Neurodiversity · Written by Artificial Sapiens

Autism in older adults involves the interaction of lifelong neurodevelopmental characteristics with the biological, psychological, and social changes of midlife and later life. An autistic person may reach age 60, 70, or 80 without having received an autism diagnosis, particularly when childhood services had narrow recognition criteria, the individual developed effective ways of adapting, or earlier clinicians interpreted their experiences through other diagnoses. Later-life recognition can explain long-standing patterns, while an emerging problem with memory, orientation, communication, movement, or daily functioning deserves its own timely clinical evaluation. The central practical task is to distinguish a person's developmental baseline from recent change and then organize the support that fits that person's circumstances. Stewart and Happé (2025); NICE CG142.

Research on autistic aging has grown considerably, but the oldest generations remain underrepresented. Much of the evidence comes from middle-aged adults, convenience samples, retrospective diagnosis, administrative records, and small qualitative studies. A September 2026 systematic review of 56 eligible studies found no convincing evidence for a single pattern of globally accelerated or protected aging in autism; studies of subjective cognitive concerns, specific health conditions, and neurodegenerative diagnoses still raise important questions. An older autistic individual's prognosis cannot be predicted from the autism label alone. Dickinson et al. (2026).

What autism means in older adulthood

Autism is a neurodevelopmental condition defined clinically by enduring differences in social communication and interaction together with restricted or repetitive behaviors, interests, or activities, which may include unusual sensory responses. Formal assessment under DSM-5-TR or ICD-11 requires a developmental history, current presentation, functional context, and an examination of alternative or coexisting explanations. Autism can first be recognized in old age, but its developmental origin is integral to the diagnosis. A first appearance of autistic-looking behavior at 75 calls for a different clinical inquiry than lifelong patterns recalled from school, family life, and employment. American Psychiatric Association (2022); NICE CG142.

The terms older adult and late-life autism describe several populations. Researchers sometimes include adults over 40 or 50 because few participants over 65 have been recruited; gerontology often emphasizes ages 65 and older. People with a childhood diagnosis, people identified in middle age, and people first assessed after retirement have different service histories and may differ substantially in intellectual disability, communication, housing, social resources, and associated medical conditions. Pooling these groups can hide important differences. Stewart and Happé (2025).

The word neurodiversity describes the variation of nervous systems across a population and a connected framework for considering disability and social participation. Neurodivergent is a nonclinical descriptor. Neither term supplies the developmental evidence or differential assessment needed for an autism diagnosis. Autistic older adults may have meaningful capabilities, severe impairments, or a complex mixture of both, with support requirements changing over time.

Why autism may remain unrecognized for decades

People now entering older adulthood grew up when autism was often associated with a narrow stereotype of childhood disability. Many who developed spoken language, worked, married, raised children, or maintained apparently conventional social lives were unlikely to be referred for assessment. Girls, women, people in marginalized communities, and adults whose environments permitted predictable routines may have been missed for different reasons. Clinical records can contain depression, anxiety, obsessive traits, social withdrawal, personality-related explanations, or no diagnosis at all. Such a record neither proves autism nor excludes it.

Autistic adults may consciously or habitually camouflage differences: rehearsing conversations, copying social expectations, suppressing visible repetitive movements, or minimizing sensory distress. Over decades, familiarity with these strategies can make developmental differences less obvious to a new clinician. Their possible costs, including fatigue and reduced opportunities to request help, should be explored with the person's own account rather than assumed. Later-life accounts may be shaped by changing norms and retrospective memory; evidence from childhood documents and knowledgeable informants is valuable when available. NICE CG142.

Life transitions can bring longstanding needs into view. Retirement alters routines and social contact. Bereavement removes a familiar source of emotional or practical support. Relocation, illness, reduced mobility, a partner's death, sensory loss, or a move to assisted living can remove accommodations that worked for decades. A person may therefore appear to become more autistic when environmental demands have changed or their compensatory capacity has been reduced. These changes call for a formulation of person and environment, not an automatic assumption that the autism itself has progressed.

Recognizing possible lifelong patterns

Social communication and relationships

An older autistic person may describe a lifelong preference for explicit language, difficulty interpreting implied expectations, a distinctive conversational rhythm, sustained attention to particular topics, or uncertainty about unspoken social rules. Some have a small number of close relationships; others enjoy substantial contact but need more recovery time after complex interactions. Eye contact, emotional expression, humor, and empathy vary markedly. One observation of unusual social behavior is insufficient for diagnosis, especially when hearing loss, language differences, pain, anxiety, medication, or cognitive impairment could affect communication.

A useful history asks what relationships were like across school, work, family, and community life, including situations that felt comfortable. A partner or longtime friend may report that certain communication preferences were present long before later-life illness. The individual's own descriptions remain essential, particularly when outsiders misinterpret direct speech, reduced facial expressiveness, or a preference for solitary activities.

Predictability, interests, repetition, and sensory experience

Predictable routines can support organization, enjoyment, and emotional regulation. Longstanding focused interests may sustain learning, identity, social belonging, and meaning in retirement. Repetitive movement or speech can serve several functions, including sensory regulation and concentration. Sensitivity or reduced sensitivity to sound, light, clothing, texture, temperature, smell, or pain may influence medical appointments, home design, travel, and residential care. Features should be interpreted in context rather than counted as symptoms detached from a person's experience.

Sensory aging complicates this picture. A hearing aid, bright waiting room, crowded pharmacy, or unfamiliar clinical equipment may create stress even when the person's lifelong sensory preferences are stable. Conversely, hearing or visual impairment may independently make conversation harder. Clinicians should check ordinary sensory health rather than attributing all communication changes to autism. NICE CG142.

Uneven abilities and support needs

Educational achievement, verbal fluency, or career success cannot substitute for assessing adaptive functioning. An individual with excellent knowledge and vocabulary may struggle with scheduling appointments, making phone calls, changing routines, navigating benefits, or maintaining meals during periods of illness. Another autistic older adult with intellectual disability or limited spoken language may need lifelong intensive assistance. The practical question is what the person can do with the right information, time, communication method, environment, and support.

Autism, normal aging, and cognitive change

Lifelong traits versus new decline

Differential assessment begins with a timeline. A preference for routine since childhood is different from newly repetitive questions associated with recent memory impairment. A decades-long communication style is different from progressive difficulty understanding familiar words. A longstanding restricted interest is different from rapidly emerging fixation accompanied by disinhibition or marked personality change. Sleep loss, grief, depression, infection, medication effects, pain, hearing loss, and neurological illness can also influence cognition and behavior.

Normal aging itself varies. Some processing speed and sensory capacities change with age, while knowledge and familiar skills may remain strong. Clinically important cognitive decline is suspected when there is a reproducible change from the individual's prior level of functioning. The inquiry should document onset, duration, progression, effects on instrumental and basic daily activities, and observations from the person and trusted others. An autism assessment and an evaluation for cognitive disorder can both be appropriate.

Dementia, mild cognitive impairment, and autism

Dementia describes acquired cognitive decline that interferes substantially with independence; mild cognitive impairment refers to demonstrable decline greater than expected for age without the level of functional disruption required for dementia. Autism describes a neurodevelopmental pattern. They can coexist. An older adult with autism can develop Alzheimer disease, vascular cognitive impairment, Lewy body dementia, or another neurological condition, while a late-life cognitive complaint can also arise from depression, sleep disorders, anxiety, medication burden, or medical illness.

A baseline is crucial because some standard cognitive tests may be influenced by atypical verbal style, attention, educational background, motor differences, sensory access, or unfamiliar testing conventions. Standard scores do not automatically separate preexisting individual differences from acquired deterioration. A specialist may need repeated measures, collateral evidence and assessment of practical functioning, sometimes supplemented by neurology, geriatric medicine, psychiatry, speech-language assessment, or neuropsychology.

The 2026 systematic review concluded that the evidence does not indicate uniform accelerated cognitive aging. A 2025 analysis of US Medicare and Medicaid records identified Alzheimer disease and related dementia diagnoses among publicly insured autistic adults, an important service-planning finding that is sensitive to claims coding, insurance selection, intellectual disability, access to specialists, and diagnostic ascertainment. It cannot by itself establish that every autistic person faces a particular dementia risk or determine causation. Dickinson et al. (2026); Tewolde et al. (2025).

When cognitive or behavioral changes need prompt evaluation

New disorientation, repeated getting lost, a marked drop in self-care, rapid changes in language, hallucinations, falls, seizures, sudden weakness, or a substantial change in alertness requires appropriate medical evaluation. Sudden confusion or acute neurological symptoms can require emergency assessment. Such presentations should never be dismissed as autism, masking, stress, or ordinary aging. A family member's concern deserves investigation, while the older adult should be included in decisions and supported to communicate their own experience.

What aging research currently establishes

Study populations and the lost-generation problem

Autistic aging research faces a major selection problem. Many current older adults were never assessed under contemporary diagnostic frameworks, while research volunteers who recognize themselves as autistic may have different medical histories, social resources, and communication profiles than adults receiving intensive support. Administrative databases capture only coded diagnoses. Small convenience samples can provide rich descriptions but rarely justify population-wide numerical estimates. Studies using high autistic-trait scores do not necessarily represent clinically diagnosed autism.

Stewart and Happé's 2025 review identifies substantial underrecognition and multiple unanswered questions about health, life transitions, cognition, and support. A 2026 scoping synthesis located only twelve qualitative papers meeting its criteria on older autistic adults' health, healthcare, and quality of life, reinforcing the need to distinguish meaningful lived-experience evidence from prevalence estimates or causal conclusions. Stewart and Happé (2025); Nicholas and colleagues (2026).

Brain, biological aging, and physical health

Studies of neuroimaging and neurocognitive measures have yielded heterogeneous findings. Research on immune, metabolic, cardiovascular, neurological, and sleep outcomes remains sensitive to who enters healthcare datasets and which diagnostic categories are recorded. A condition associated with greater healthcare use in one administrative sample may be genuinely more common, more frequently detected, or both. The 2026 systematic review reports no single overall accelerated-aging pattern, while highlighting unresolved domain-specific vulnerabilities and elevated subjective cognitive concerns. Dickinson et al. (2026).

Clinical practice should nonetheless evaluate ordinary age-related health needs thoroughly. Chronic pain, dental disease, gastrointestinal problems, cardiovascular risk, mobility restrictions, menopause-related symptoms, sleep apnea, medication adverse effects, and hearing or vision loss deserve the same attention as in any other aging population. Communication and sensory adaptations may improve the accuracy of history-taking and access to care. The current literature supports attention to service barriers more strongly than it supports a universal biological theory of autistic aging.

Mental health, distress, and quality of life

Depression and anxiety may be overlooked when sleep disturbances, social withdrawal, or changes in activity are attributed to longstanding autism. Mood disorders require assessment of a change from the individual's usual emotional state, interests, energy, appetite, sleep, and functioning. Grief and isolation matter in later life, as do trauma histories, poverty, social exclusion, and chronic stress. Clinicians should ask about suicidal thinking when indicated by depressive symptoms, expressed hopelessness, or other risk factors, applying standard individualized safety assessment rather than inferring risk from a diagnostic label.

Qualitative studies emphasize connection, control over daily life, practical paperwork, and the availability of appropriate support. In interviews with 16 autistic adults aged 40 and older, Viner and colleagues identified diagnosis, relationships, autonomy, administrative demands, and vulnerability as important dimensions of quality of life. These themes inform respectful service design while remaining findings from a small qualitative sample. Viner et al. (2024).

Assessment for autism in later life

Starting with the person's own questions

A useful assessment starts with what the person hopes to understand or change. Some want a coherent explanation for lifelong experiences. Others seek practical accommodations, an accurate clinical record, help navigating relationships, or clarity about changes after retirement. Some want self-understanding without seeking a formal diagnosis. The person's choice, communication preferences, consent, and autonomy must remain central.

In the United States, an adult may begin with a primary-care clinician or specialist experienced in adult autism assessment. Availability varies widely; geriatric, neuropsychological, psychiatric, or interdisciplinary input may be important when cognitive decline, substantial sensory loss, intellectual disability, or complex medical conditions are present. NICE CG142 provides a detailed evidence-based adult assessment framework, although local referral, insurance, and eligibility systems differ between countries. NICE CG142.

Building a developmental and life-course history

A comprehensive assessment explores early social communication, childhood play and interests, routines, sensory differences, schooling, family and peer relationships, employment, major transitions, and current functioning. School reports, letters, work history, earlier clinical records, or conversations with a sibling or longtime friend can supplement a person's memories when welcomed. The absence of surviving family informants is common in later life and should be documented rather than treated as automatic disqualification.

The clinician integrates developmental information with direct observation and the individual's current account. They consider the whole pattern, its persistence across relevant settings, the degree of support needed, and whether coexisting conditions explain some features. Clinical judgment must take account of the person's adaptations, cultural context, gendered expectations, intellectual and language abilities, and sensory access.

Screening questionnaires and diagnostic instruments

Screeners such as the AQ-10 can indicate whether a fuller assessment may be useful in the settings for which they were evaluated. A questionnaire score is neither proof of autism nor proof of its absence. Older-adult-specific validation is limited; cutoff performance may differ in a geriatric mental health clinic, a self-referred population, or a general community sample. Visual, motor, cognitive, and language barriers can affect test completion. NICE explicitly allows clinical suspicion to justify full assessment even when the preliminary screening threshold is not met. NICE CG142.

Structured observation and developmental interviews can help a competent clinician, but no single instrument provides a standalone diagnosis. In a person with possible dementia, hearing loss, psychosis, profound depression, or major language impairment, interpreting a standardized autism score requires special caution. Some instruments were validated on groups unlike today's older autistic adults, so psychometric certainty must be stated honestly.

Differential and co-occurring conditions

A careful formulation considers social anxiety, lifelong or newly developed obsessive-compulsive symptoms, ADHD, sensory disability, intellectual disability, depression, trauma-related symptoms, psychosis, personality-related patterns, medication effects, and neurocognitive illness. Overlap in behavior is common, but the mechanisms, developmental sequence, and treatment targets differ. Autism and any of these conditions can coexist. The purpose of differential diagnosis is to explain the person more accurately, identify new clinical concerns, and choose appropriate care.

Late diagnosis also raises emotional questions. Some people experience recognition and relief, others grief over missed support or anger about earlier interpretations, and many report mixed responses. Research with adults diagnosed in their sixties and seventies emphasizes the importance of dialogue and personalized support after diagnosis rather than a single assumed psychological outcome. From diagnosis to dialogue (2025).

Everyday life and transitions in later adulthood

Retirement and loss of familiar structure

Retirement may remove exhausting workplace demands and provide more control over time. It may also disrupt predictable schedules, social relationships, identity, financial security, and access to practical assistance. In qualitative interviews with twelve autistic people who had retired or were preparing to retire, experiences ranged from welcome relief to significant difficulty with planning and adjustment. The sample was small and not representative, but it identifies questions that deserve individual attention. Davies et al. (2024).

A larger UK mixed-methods survey published in 2026 included 517 autistic and non-autistic adults aged 40–90. It reported differences in employment histories, preparation, and financial circumstances while acknowledging the limits of a survey sample. Practical support can include pensions information, accessible written steps, budgeting assistance, trial routines, planned social opportunities, and opportunities to continue valued interests. Kowalczyk et al. (2026).

Bereavement, relationships, and changing support networks

A spouse, sibling, friend, or colleague may have been part of an informal support system for decades. Bereavement can therefore bring both grief and the loss of someone who helped with appointments, interpretation of social expectations, transportation, meals, or paperwork. A clinician or social worker should ask what roles the relationship served, while supporting the person's own preferred ways of mourning and seeking connection.

Some older autistic people want more social contact; others want fewer demands and stronger boundaries. Quality of life cannot be measured by the number of social activities alone. Accessible groups organized around shared interests, a dependable friend, individual counseling, peer support, or supported online communication may each be valuable depending on preference and feasibility.

Menopause and other physiological transitions

For people undergoing menopause, sleep changes, hot flashes, sensory discomfort, pain, mood symptoms, and cognitive complaints can overlap with existing autistic vulnerabilities. Small participatory and qualitative studies document difficulties accessing understandable information and individualized care, but do not establish that menopause produces a universal change in autism severity. Clinicians should assess and treat menopausal symptoms on their own merits, make accommodations during consultations, and avoid interpreting all new symptoms through autism. Moseley et al. (2020); Menopause qualitative study (2024).

Housing, independent living, and residential care

Later-life housing decisions involve accessibility, privacy, sensory predictability, familiar routines, safety, proximity to chosen relationships, and access to healthcare. An apartment can be comfortable until mobility loss makes stairs unsafe. Shared housing may meet physical-care needs but create sensory or social strain. Assisted living or nursing-home services should seek an individualized description of communication, personal space, diet, daily routines, preferred activities, distress signals, and consent processes.

Care plans should be built collaboratively. Staff training can prevent understandable distress from being interpreted as deliberate noncompliance. A written health or communication passport may document the person's preferences and practical accommodations. Evidence about outcomes in autism-specific residential models for older people remains limited; decisions should therefore be individualized and reviewed.

Healthcare access and practical accommodations

Making appointments usable

Healthcare encounters can become difficult when instructions are vague, time is unpredictable, waiting rooms are noisy, or clinicians mistake limited eye contact for indifference. Simple adjustments include written agendas, clear appointment schedules, direct explanations, options for reduced sensory input, longer consultation time when needed, advance notice of procedures, and permission to communicate through a preferred method. These adjustments support more accurate assessment as well as respectful care. NICE CG142.

A person may prefer a concise written summary after the appointment, including the purpose of each medicine, test, follow-up, warning sign, and contact route. A trusted supporter can attend with consent; the older adult should still be addressed directly. Hearing or vision aids, interpreters, assistive communication, and accessible digital interfaces should be considered as needed.

Primary care, prevention, and chronic disease

Older autistic adults require routine vaccinations, cancer screening where appropriate, cardiovascular risk assessment, dental care, fall-risk review, medication reconciliation, assessment of pain, nutrition, sleep, and preventive services based on clinical history and age. Some people may avoid care after repeated inaccessible encounters or have difficulty identifying and conveying bodily symptoms. Care teams should proactively inquire about physical health and investigate changes without assuming that distress is purely behavioral or psychological.

Medication review is especially important when multiple prescriptions, sedation, orthostatic symptoms, anticholinergic burden, or interactions might contribute to falls and confusion. Pharmacologic treatment may be indicated for a diagnosed co-occurring disorder or an independently assessed medical problem; medication does not remove the defining neurodevelopmental characteristics of autism. NICE CG142.

Mental healthcare and tailored therapy

Evidence-based treatment for depression, anxiety, insomnia, grief-related complications, and other clinical concerns can be adapted through concrete language, explicit structure, written material, pacing, sensory adjustments, and collaborative goals. A therapist should distinguish an autistic person's stable preferences from a new syndrome requiring treatment. Generalized efforts to force typical-looking social behavior can obscure meaningful outcomes such as reduced distress, functioning, autonomy, and safety.

Psychological services should include screening and treatment for suicide risk when clinically indicated, using accessible communication and a personalized safety plan. If someone expresses imminent intent to harm themselves or cannot maintain immediate safety, urgent local emergency or crisis services are indicated; routine follow-up is insufficient for an acute emergency.

Support planning with older autistic adults

A person-centered assessment of needs

Support begins by asking what a good later life means to this individual. Goals may include staying in familiar housing, avoiding overwhelming environments, maintaining chosen friendships, protecting an important interest, improving sleep, safely accessing healthcare, organizing finances, or reducing the burden of administrative tasks. A plan should specify what works already and preserve it where possible.

Support needs are multidimensional and change with the environment. Assess communication, cognition, physical and mental health, sensory access, mobility, daily living, social networks, financial stability, caregiver availability, and risk of exploitation or neglect. Revisit plans after significant events such as hospitalization, bereavement, new cognitive symptoms, or a move. Participation and dignity are outcomes in their own right.

Working with partners, family, and professional supporters

Caregiving relationships should respect consent, privacy, competence, and preferred communication. Family members can help identify changes from baseline or support navigation of complex services. They may also need assistance with their own stress and practical burdens. Autistic people have diverse family structures, and some choose not to involve relatives. Services must provide support pathways that do not depend on a spouse, adult child, or unpaid caregiver being available.

When a supporter notices increasing confusion or inability to perform usual tasks, the response is to document the change and seek evaluation, not to redefine the person's lifelong identity. When the problem is a newly inaccessible environment, accommodations may be more effective than an attempt to modify the person's behavior. Both kinds of problem may be present together.

Legal and financial considerations in the United States

Eligibility for disability-related programs, workplace protections, health insurance, Medicaid long-term services, Social Security benefits, or supported decision-making depends on specific rules, documentation, functional needs, age, and jurisdiction. A clinical diagnosis is one component of a service application, not a universal entitlement or a substitute for functional evidence. Older adults and supporters may benefit from independent benefits counseling, disability rights organizations, aging services, and qualified legal advice when major housing, guardianship, estate, or financial decisions arise.

Presumption of adult autonomy should guide planning. When formal decision-making capacity is questioned, capacity must be evaluated for the particular decision and circumstance rather than inferred from autism or age. Supported decision-making and accessible explanations may enable meaningful informed choices.

Research limitations and priorities

Three sources of uncertainty recur. First, many participants in aging research represent a selected portion of the autistic population. Second, cross-sectional age comparisons do not establish what changed within one person over decades. Third, traits and diagnoses are often measured differently across childhood, adulthood, geriatric settings, and administrative datasets. An apparent age effect may reflect historical changes in diagnostic practice, intellectual-disability representation, service access, mortality selection, or cohort differences.

Research urgently needs inclusive longitudinal cohorts that begin before late life and include autistic adults with intellectual disability, non-speaking adults, marginalized ethnic communities, varied economic circumstances, and people receiving substantial support. Studies should compare objective and subjective cognition, examine repeated changes relative to a person's baseline, and test practical service adaptations in real healthcare and residential settings. Involving older autistic people in choosing outcomes can help avoid research that measures only clinician convenience.

The evidence base currently supports individualized recognition, comprehensive assessment of new change, accessible ordinary medical care, and person-directed assistance. Whether specific biological aging mechanisms or interventions generalize across autistic older adults remains a research question. Dickinson et al. (2026); Stewart and Happé (2025).

Frequently asked questions

Can autism first develop at age 70?

Autism is a neurodevelopmental condition, so a first formal diagnosis at 70 means that features are understood as having been present since development, even when unnoticed or interpreted differently for decades. New problems that genuinely begin at 70 should be investigated for medical, neurological, psychiatric, sensory, and environmental causes.

Is autism the same as dementia in older people?

No. Autism involves a lifelong developmental pattern, while dementia entails acquired cognitive decline that substantially affects independent functioning. They can coexist. A change from a person's longstanding abilities is a reason to evaluate possible cognitive illness, even when autism has already been diagnosed.

Does every autistic person age faster?

Current systematic evidence does not show an overall pattern of accelerated aging across all domains and autistic people. Results vary by cognitive measure, health condition, cohort, and ascertainment method. Particular risks deserve research and routine individual clinical assessment rather than a universal prognosis. Dickinson et al. (2026).

Is a late autism diagnosis worthwhile?

It may help a person understand their life, communicate preferences, and obtain appropriate adjustments or services. The value depends on their questions, local access, personal priorities, and the quality of post-diagnostic support. Some seek formal assessment; others prioritize practical accommodations and medical care without pursuing a label.

Can a screening questionnaire establish autism in an older adult?

No. Screening tools only assist decisions about further assessment and have important population-specific limitations. A trained clinician must evaluate developmental history, the current pattern, associated needs, and alternative explanations. A screening result should never replace investigation of cognitive decline or physical illness.

How can relatives support an autistic older adult?

Ask which forms of help are welcome, preserve valued routines and interests, use clear communication, facilitate accessible healthcare, and help document meaningful changes from baseline. When there are abrupt or progressive new problems, seek clinical evaluation. Support should strengthen the person's chosen autonomy and relationships.

Related Articles

Late Autism Diagnosis in Adulthood: Recognition and Adjustment — developmental history, routes to assessment, and adjustment after recognition.

Autism in Women: Signs, Masking, and Diagnostic Bias — gendered recognition and limitations of diagnostic stereotypes.

Adult Autism Diagnosis: Assessment, Criteria, and What to Expect — clinical evaluation and differential diagnosis.

Autistic Sensory Processing: Hypersensitivity, Hyposensitivity, and Accommodations — understanding sensory features across contexts.

Autism and Depression in Adults: Recognition, Risk, and Care — differentiating distress from baseline characteristics.

References

American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., text rev.; DSM-5-TR). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787.

Blok, M., Jacobs, F. W., Videler, A. C., Geurts, H. M., and Teunisse, J. P. (2025). From diagnosis to dialogue: A call for support of older adults with a late autism diagnosis. The Gerontologist, 65(10), gnaf181. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf181.

Davies, J., Matthews, R., Romualdez, A. M., Pellicano, E., and Remington, A. (2024). Retirement is one hell of a change: Autistic people's experiences of retiring. Autism in Adulthood. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2023.0155.

Dickinson, A., Ryan, D., Carroll, J. E., and Lord, C. (2026). Aging in autism: A systematic review of cognitive, neural, and physical health findings. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 188, 106820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2026.106820.

Kowalczyk, Z., Fadzil, A. H. A., Ward, I., Happé, F., and Stewart, G. R. (2026). A new pace of life: A mixed-methods exploration of retirement plans, preparations and experiences in middle-aged and older autistic and non-autistic adults. Autism, 30, 1330–1343. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613261431925.

Moseley, R. L., and colleagues. (2020). When my autism broke: A qualitative study spotlighting autistic voices on menopause. Autism. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7376624/.

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2012; updated 2021). Autism spectrum disorder in adults: Diagnosis and management (CG142). https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg142/chapter/Recommendations.

Nicholas, D. B., Nelson, H., Shafai, F., Edelson, S. M., Bal, V., Lawson, W., Bauman, M., Hendren, R., and Trollor, J. N. (2026). Examining the lived experiences of older autistic adults: A synthesis review of qualitative literature. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42105016/.

Stewart, G. R., and Happé, F. (2025). Aging across the autism spectrum. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology, 7, 461–484. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-devpsych-111323-090813.

Tewolde, S., Rosenberg, S. B., Estrada, J. A. G., Pescador Jimenez, M., Scott, A., Higgins, A., and Rubenstein, E. (2025). Epidemiology of Alzheimer disease and related dementia among Medicare and Medicaid enrolled autistic adults, 2011–2019. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40166852/.

Viner, H. E., Yuill, N., Costa, A. P., Radford, H., and Kornadt, A. E. (2024). A qualitative interview study on quality of life and ageing experiences of autistic adults. Communications Psychology, 2, 99. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-024-00142-0.

World Health Organization. (2024). Clinical descriptions and diagnostic requirements for ICD-11 mental, behavioural and neurodevelopmental disorders. https://www.who.int/publications/b/68103.