Autism and Executive Function: Planning, Shifting, and Daily Demands

Author: Angela Bogdanova · Published: October 18, 2026 · Editorial Policy

Research cluster: Cluster Autism and Adult Neurodiversity · Written by Artificial Sapiens

Executive function in autistic adult life

Executive function refers to a family of cognitive control processes that help people maintain goals, organize actions, hold relevant information in mind, inhibit competing responses, and adapt when circumstances change. In autistic adults, executive functioning is often discussed through the practical demands of making a plan, beginning a task, changing activities, managing time, and completing several connected steps. Research supports group-level differences across executive-function measures, together with substantial variation between autistic people and between laboratory performance and everyday functioning. Executive-function difficulties are neither a universal feature of autism nor an independent diagnostic test for it. Demetriou et al., 2018 Johnston et al., 2019

The most useful question in adult life is usually more specific than whether a person has “poor executive function.” It asks which operations become difficult, under what conditions, at what personal cost, and what changes make the intended activity manageable. An adult may understand a complex subject deeply while struggling to arrange an appointment, leave the house at a particular time, change an established sequence, or return to work after an interruption. Intellectual ability and the successful coordination of daily activities are related but distinct dimensions of functioning. NICE CG142 Yon-Hernández et al., 2023

What executive functions include

Goal maintenance, working memory, and inhibition

Working memory allows a person to retain and manipulate information during a task, such as remembering several instructions while preparing a meal. Inhibitory control helps regulate responses and protect a relevant goal against distractions. Goal maintenance connects both functions: the person must remember what they intended to accomplish and select actions that move toward that outcome. These processes interact with language comprehension, attention, motivation, perceptual load, and the demands of a particular environment. The general cognitive model commonly distinguishes working memory, inhibition, and cognitive flexibility as related foundations for more complex planning and reasoning. Diamond, 2013

Consider an adult completing an online application. Reading instructions, remembering a document number, deciding which question comes next, suppressing the impulse to follow an unrelated notification, and returning to the form after a phone call draw upon overlapping executive processes. A difficulty in this situation might arise from divided attention, uncertain wording, fatigue, sensory input, or the structure of the form as well as from an underlying executive-function difference. Assessment becomes more informative when it identifies the particular source of the difficulty.

Planning, sequencing, and prospective memory

Planning involves representing a desired outcome, specifying subgoals, ordering actions, estimating the resources required, monitoring progress, and revising the plan when an obstacle appears. Sequencing concerns the order of actions; prospective memory concerns remembering to perform an intention at a later moment. An adult may reliably recall past events yet forget to start a planned activity when the appropriate moment arrives. Another may know the steps of a task but find it difficult to choose the first step among several equally plausible alternatives.

Prospective-memory research is especially relevant because real-world plans must eventually become actions. A 2025 study used tasks embedded in three days of everyday-life experience sampling with 29 autistic adults and 30 comparison participants. Such research brings measurement closer to naturally occurring time pressure, personal motivation, and routine, although small samples limit generalization. Prospective Memory Performance of Autistic Adults in Everyday Life, 2025 Laboratory studies of planning have also found mixed patterns, including difficulties on some timed planning measures without comparable differences on every measure of shifting. Profiling planning skills and cognitive flexibility in adults, 2022

Cognitive flexibility and shifting

Cognitive flexibility describes the capacity to adjust an approach when information, rules, or goals change. Task switching is a narrower operation: disengaging from one task set and establishing another. Set shifting in laboratory tests often requires a participant to learn that the previously correct sorting rule has changed. In daily life, a shift may involve stopping a satisfying activity for an unexpected obligation, changing a travel route, abandoning a familiar method, or tolerating an unfinished project.

A change of task can contain several costs: recognizing that a change is necessary, stopping the current sequence, identifying the new rule, managing emotional reactions to uncertainty, initiating a new sequence, and reconstructing the earlier task afterward. Therefore, a reported “difficulty switching” can reflect multiple cognitive, sensory, and situational processes. A quantitative review of cognitive flexibility found that common performance tests could not reliably distinguish autistic from non-autistic participants at the individual level. Leung and Zakzanis, 2014

Monitoring, self-regulation, and completion

Successful action also requires monitoring: checking whether each step has advanced the overall goal, noticing errors, managing competing commitments, and deciding when the task is finished. For some autistic adults, the difficulty is concentrated near the beginning of an activity; for others, completion, stopping, or recovery after interruption is more demanding. These are useful descriptions for support planning. They do not automatically demonstrate one neuropsychological mechanism.

What the research finds in autism

Group averages and individual variation

A major meta-analysis combined 235 studies with 14,081 participants, including 6,816 autistic participants and 7,265 controls. It found a moderate overall group-level difference across executive-function measures, alongside considerable heterogeneity and strong effects of measurement method. The review did not establish a single executive-function deficit that could accurately identify autism in an individual. Differences appeared across several measured domains rather than forming a reliable diagnostic pattern. Demetriou et al., 2018

The distinction between group-level findings and individual profiles is fundamental. In a study of 110 autistic adults and 31 age- and IQ-matched controls, autistic adults as a group had greater executive-function difficulties, but 35.8% of the autistic participants showed no impairment on the executive measures used in that study. Everyday dysexecutive behavior and experimental task scores also did not map neatly onto each other. The sample does not provide a universal percentage for all autistic adults, but it vividly demonstrates why individual assessment must replace assumptions about a diagnosis. Johnston et al., 2019

Autistic adults can display notable strengths in systematic analysis, knowledge of preferred fields, sustained engagement, consistency, attention to detail, or well-rehearsed routines. These strengths and executive-function differences can coexist. A predictable environment may support highly effective performance, whereas ambiguous deadlines, rapidly changing expectations, and multiple unannounced interruptions can make the same person less effective. Neither the strengths nor the challenges should be assumed from the autism label alone.

Why laboratory tests and daily-life reports disagree

Laboratory executive-function tasks offer standard instructions, limited durations, explicit rules, and controlled distractions. They can measure specific aspects of speed, accuracy, inhibition, working memory, and shifting. Everyday environments require self-directed goal formation, prioritization, social negotiation, sustained performance, and task transitions while a person also manages noise, travel, fatigue, and competing obligations. A strong laboratory score can coexist with substantial daily support needs; a weaker score may reflect a test's time limit or unfamiliar format.

Questionnaires about everyday executive behavior often identify more extensive difficulties than laboratory tests, but they introduce their own limitations. Ratings reflect the observer's opportunities, expectations, cultural context, and comparison standards; self-report can be affected by insight, interpretation, and current distress. The strongest clinical account integrates different methods rather than treating one questionnaire or test as decisive. The measurement discrepancy is an established research concern, while the best way to combine tests and ecological measures remains an active methodological question. Demetriou et al., 2018 Johnston et al., 2019

Adult evidence remains uneven

A substantial share of executive-function research involves children, adolescents, clinically referred samples, or autistic adults without intellectual disability. Results may not generalize to adults with intellectual disability, people who use alternative communication, older adults, or those facing multiple health and social barriers. Cross-sectional comparisons cannot by themselves show how a person's abilities change over time or whether a specific cognitive process causes an outcome. Newer real-life and intervention studies are valuable, but many remain small or short-term. Demetriou, DeMayo, and Guastella, 2019

Planning and task organization in everyday life

Starting a multi-step activity

A task such as preparing for work can require selecting clothes, checking transport, locating keys, managing personal care, eating, and leaving at an appropriate time. Each step has an order, duration, and dependency. People may experience a demanding initiation phase even when they are capable of completing every component. A vague instruction such as “get ready” may hide many choices; a clear external sequence can reduce the need to build the plan from scratch.

A useful support method is to define the intended outcome and translate it into concrete steps. The degree of detail should reflect the person's preferences and task complexity. For one person, “prepare lunch” is sufficient; for another, putting the ingredients on the counter, starting a timer, and establishing the next action in writing makes the task accessible. Repetition may make a sequence easier, but routines should remain adaptable to the person's actual needs.

Estimating time and coordinating commitments

Time management involves estimating duration, anticipating delays, scheduling necessary preparatory steps, and switching attention when the next activity is due. An adult may know a meeting begins at 2 p.m. but misjudge the amount of time required to finish a current task, find a route, recover from a sensory-demanding journey, and arrive ready to participate. This may resemble procrastination from the outside while reflecting a complicated interaction between prospective memory, task initiation, competing goals, and environmental burden.

External calendars, departure alarms, visible countdowns, and deliberately placed transition periods are reasonable accommodations to test. Their effectiveness depends on whether the reminders are understandable, accessible, accepted by the person, and linked to an achievable next action. An alarm that only says “meeting” may be less useful than a timely prompt specifying “close the document, collect your bag, and leave.” These strategies are practical applications of task decomposition and prospective-memory support; their precise efficacy for a particular autistic adult should be evaluated individually.

Managing interruptions and unfinished work

An interruption often creates an additional requirement: preserve the current task state, shift to an immediate demand, and reconstruct the original goal later. Some autistic adults report that recovering the previous sequence takes substantial effort. A written “resume here” note, a saved workspace, or a shared understanding that interruptions should be batched can reduce the need to reconstruct work from memory.

At home, similar approaches can help with cooking, cleaning, correspondence, bills, and medication routines. A checklist should track actions that truly need to be performed, rather than impose a rigid lifestyle ideal. A useful support system makes essential tasks more accessible while preserving the person's discretion and autonomy.

Shifting, predictability, and unexpected change

Why a transition can feel costly

A transition between two activities can involve more than choosing a new task. The person may need time to close a cognitive sequence, prepare sensory expectations, understand the reason for the change, and reallocate attention. A request delivered abruptly, without clear priority or end point, adds uncertainty to those demands. Research supports the relevance of executive-function variation, but no single theory fully accounts for every autistic person's response to change. Leung and Zakzanis, 2014 Demetriou, DeMayo, and Guastella, 2019

A transition can be made more manageable by offering advance notice where feasible, identifying which part of the existing activity may be completed, explaining the new expectation, and agreeing on a clear next step. The purpose is coordinated action with predictable information. An adult's preference for structure is compatible with independence and choice.

Routines, interests, and flexibility

Routines may organize cognition, reduce decision burden, protect energy, and create a reliable sequence of actions. Focused interests can support concentration, learning, professional expertise, enjoyment, and regulation. A change to a valued activity can therefore affect motivation, predictability, and sensory or emotional comfort at the same time. The functional question is how the routine serves the person and what happens when flexibility is required.

It is also possible for external routines to become overly restrictive or difficult to maintain. Useful support takes account of the person's goals and environment. A workable approach might preserve stable anchors, develop backup plans for common disruptions, and reserve additional transition time on days with high social or sensory demands. Evidence for any single routine-based protocol in autistic adults remains limited.

Executive function, adaptive functioning, and independence

Adaptive functioning concerns how people meet practical demands in areas such as communication, self-care, home management, employment, transportation, and participation. It cannot be reduced to an intelligence test score or to a single executive-function measure. Clinical guidance specifically warns that intellectual ability and practical planning or daily-living functioning may diverge in autistic adults. NICE CG142

In a 2023 study comparing 24 autistic adults, 12 adults with schizophrenia, and 25 controls, the researchers examined executive measures, intelligence, clinical features, and adaptive skills. They reported associations between executive-function measures and adaptive performance in the autism group, with a complex contribution from IQ and other factors. The study's modest sample and observational design limit causal conclusions, but it supports the value of studying everyday adaptive outcomes alongside cognitive tasks. Yon-Hernández et al., 2023

Independence can take multiple forms. Some people perform daily activities without assistance; some use reminders, written guidance, transportation support, shared decision-making, or practical help. Accommodations and assistive technology may increase self-direction because fewer cognitive resources are consumed by preventable demands. Evaluation should therefore consider both the action accomplished and the support or environmental conditions that made it possible.

Interacting factors and differential assessment

Autism and ADHD

Autism and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder can co-occur. Both may involve attention regulation, working-memory demands, organization, and task initiation, yet their diagnostic criteria and clinical histories are distinct. A person may experience distractibility, difficulty starting tasks, and resistance to unexpected changes for several overlapping reasons. An executive-function rating scale cannot determine which diagnosis is present or explain the whole profile. The AuDHD article examines established co-occurrence and its assessment implications. The broader cognitive-control concepts are discussed in Executive Functions: Inhibition, Working Memory, and Flexibility.

Anxiety, uncertainty, sleep, and emotional distress

Anxiety may consume working-memory resources, narrow attention, complicate decisions, and make a changed plan harder to approach. Sleep disturbance, depression, chronic stress, medication effects, pain, and physical illness can also influence performance. A recent deterioration in organization deserves assessment rather than automatic attribution to lifelong autism. Distinguishing a stable cognitive profile from changing mental-health or medical conditions matters for effective treatment and support. Diamond, 2013 NICE CG142

Autistic adults may also experience distress associated with uncertain expectations, sensory environments, workplace demands, social misunderstanding, and insufficient accommodations. The separate article Anxiety and Autism: Comorbidity, Uncertainty, Sensory Stress, and Assessment addresses these overlapping phenomena without equating them.

Sensory processing and environmental demands

Noise, lighting, crowding, and unpredictable movement can consume attention and make planning or shifting less reliable. A task may be manageable in a quiet, predictable space and exhausting in a loud shared environment. These circumstances are not merely background variables: they influence the actual demands placed on executive control. NICE recommends adapting sensory environments and using clear, individualized communication and predictable structures when supporting autistic adults. NICE CG142

Fatigue, camouflaging, and burnout

Sustained effort to manage social expectations, suppress visible self-regulatory behavior, cope with unpredictable demands, or appear consistently organized may add to daily cognitive load. Autistic burnout is an emerging research construct describing a pattern of profound exhaustion and reduced functioning reported by some autistic people; its definition and measurement are still developing. Executive difficulties during periods of marked exhaustion warrant attention to workload, recovery, environmental fit, mood, and medical factors. The separate Autistic Burnout article examines that emerging literature; Autistic Unmasking addresses a related identity and adaptation topic.

Assessment: clinical questions and scientific limits

What clinicians and researchers measure

A comprehensive adult assessment may examine developmental history, current functional concerns, co-occurring conditions, strengths, cognitive abilities, everyday routines, sleep, medication, environmental demands, and the person's own goals. Neuropsychological testing can address planning, response inhibition, working memory, processing speed, and flexibility. Everyday-function questionnaires, interviews, and adaptive-behavior measures can add information about work, home, and community life. No single score captures the complexity of functioning across environments. Johnston et al., 2019

Planning tasks such as the Tower of London and rule-switching tasks such as the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test measure circumscribed forms of performance. Their findings are sensitive to instructions, timing, strategy, language comprehension, fatigue, and other conditions. A small adult exploratory study found difficulties on several Tower of London indicators but no corresponding impairment across the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test indicators it examined. Such results illustrate why tests should be interpreted in context rather than treated as a fixed autism signature. Profiling planning skills and cognitive flexibility in adults, 2022

What executive-function testing cannot diagnose

Autism is diagnosed through clinical evaluation of its developmental and behavioral criteria, drawing upon current classification standards, history, observations, and appropriate differential assessment. Executive-function difficulties occur in many conditions and in people without a diagnosis. Consequently, executive-function questionnaires and neuropsychological tasks are not autism screening instruments in themselves and cannot establish, confirm, or exclude autism. Test results may help explain support needs or co-occurring difficulties while leaving diagnostic questions to an appropriate qualified assessment. NICE CG142 Demetriou et al., 2018

An important clinical distinction concerns an autistic adult whose planning difficulty has been present across life stages and one who develops pronounced new confusion, disorganization, or loss of established skills. The second situation calls for consideration of new psychiatric, neurological, medication-related, sleep, or other medical causes. The presence of autism should not prevent timely assessment of a new problem.

What may help: support, accommodations, and interventions

Match support to the task and the person

The most defensible practical approach begins with an individualized analysis of the activity. Identify the intended outcome, the step at which progress stops, the environmental demands, the time pressure, and the assistance the person would welcome. This separates a memory problem from an unclear instruction, a difficult transition from sensory overload, and a scheduling difficulty from an inaccessible service process. Solutions can then be tested, revised, and withdrawn when no longer useful.

Externalizing a plan can reduce working-memory demands. Practical methods include task sequences, visible calendars, short written instructions, one-action prompts, reserved preparation periods, labeled storage, predictable appointment procedures, and notification settings that protect uninterrupted work. For transitions, advance notice, time buffers, a clearly defined stopping point, and an explicit next action are reasonable adaptations. These are support strategies whose value should be evaluated against the person's actual functioning and preferences, rather than promoted as a universally proven treatment.

Teaching and practicing daily-living skills

NICE advises considering structured, predictable, behaviorally informed training for autistic adults who need help with activities of daily living, regardless of intellectual ability. Goals should be practical and person-centered: for example, using transportation, preparing food safely, planning an appointment, or organizing medication with appropriate clinical guidance. Structured practice can be combined with accessible instructions and meaningful environmental adaptations. NICE CG142

A small 2021 pilot study of seven young autistic adults evaluated a ten-session program targeting executive skills and adaptive behavior. Improvements on some ratings suggested feasibility but could not establish effectiveness because the study lacked a randomized control group. A later randomized study of an executive-function training intervention in autistic adults without intellectual disability reported improvements in selected everyday executive and adaptive outcomes. Its findings are promising for the studied population and program, while replication, longer-term follow-up, and evidence for diverse adult groups remain important. Pilot executive-function intervention, 2021 Improving adaptive behaviors through executive function training, 2023

Work, study, and relationships

At work, useful accommodations may include written priorities, realistic deadlines, predictable meeting schedules, quiet work areas, fewer simultaneous communication channels, and advance notice of major changes. Clear task ownership and specific descriptions of completed work can reduce ambiguity. NICE recommends individualized supported employment for autistic adults who have difficulty obtaining or keeping work, including matching roles to strengths and continuing support after employment begins. NICE CG142

Educational institutions can offer accessible syllabi, predictable scheduling, written changes, alternative communication formats, and explicit stages for large assignments. Partners, relatives, or colleagues may be helpful when they agree on roles and respect autonomy. A collaborative division of tasks should be based on the individual's goals and consent, rather than assumptions about capability.

Treatment of co-occurring conditions

Psychological interventions may need clearer structure, concrete language, written supports, pacing, and planned breaks. NICE recommends adapting interventions for co-occurring mental disorders to an autistic person's communication and sensory needs. Medication can be appropriate for separately assessed co-occurring conditions according to their own indications and monitoring requirements; there is no established medication that removes autism's defining developmental features, and executive difficulty alone is not a medication indication. NICE CG142

An individualized executive-function support plan

A support plan can be built around one real activity rather than a broad label. Define the goal in the adult's own terms and observe where the process becomes difficult: remembering the intention, selecting a first action, estimating time, maintaining focus, changing course, completing the task, or recovering afterward. Note the surrounding conditions, including the sensory environment, sleep, unexpected requests, and competing responsibilities. Select one or two adaptations with the person's consent, agree on a meaningful outcome, and review whether the process becomes more manageable.

For example, an adult who repeatedly misses a weekly appointment may benefit from two distinct supports: an early reminder to gather required documents and a departure reminder tied to a realistic travel estimate. Another who struggles to return to complex work after interruptions may benefit more from protected work blocks and a short handoff note recording the next step. The effectiveness of each adaptation is determined by the person's experience and real-world functioning rather than by the apparent sophistication of the tool.

The plan should also allow the person to reject strategies that produce excessive notifications, unwanted monitoring, or additional cognitive work. Accessible support increases practical control over daily life. Evaluation must consider effort, dignity, sustainability, and the person's preferred degree of assistance.

Evidence quality and unresolved research questions

The established evidence supports executive-function differences at the group level, heterogeneous individual profiles, and meaningful links between cognitive-control demands and everyday adaptive functioning. Strong evidence also supports the importance of context, support needs, and co-occurring conditions when evaluating adult functioning. Demetriou et al., 2018 Johnston et al., 2019 NICE CG142

More limited evidence concerns which autism-specific training programs produce durable improvements in everyday autonomy, whether particular neuropsychological profiles predict treatment response, and how findings generalize across intellectual abilities, gender identities, cultures, and older ages. Some widely discussed explanations of transitions, attention, monotropism, or task inertia are useful hypotheses or descriptions but currently have distinct and evolving empirical foundations. Executive-function research should evaluate them with operational definitions and appropriate outcome measures rather than folding them into a single assumed causal model.

Methodologically, future studies need broader adult samples, longitudinal designs, meaningful real-world outcomes, attention to co-occurring ADHD and mental-health conditions, and autistic participation in identifying valuable outcomes. A change on a laboratory task is informative, but the most consequential outcome is often whether the person can achieve a personally meaningful activity with acceptable effort and appropriate support.

Frequently asked questions

Do all autistic adults have executive-function difficulties?

No. Studies demonstrate group-level differences alongside extensive individual variation. In one adult study, more than one-third of the autistic sample showed no impairment on the executive measures administered; that figure belongs to the specific sample and measures, not to the entire autistic population. Johnston et al., 2019

Can someone have strong intellectual abilities and still need help planning everyday tasks?

Yes. Intellectual ability, executive control, and adaptive functioning are related but different dimensions. A person may reason well in structured settings yet require support with time management, transitions, errands, or multi-step activities. NICE CG142

Does trouble switching tasks mean someone is autistic?

No. Switching difficulties arise for many reasons, including ADHD, stress, poor sleep, anxiety, and environmental demands. Autism assessment considers developmental and behavioral criteria, functional context, and differential diagnosis. Executive-function performance alone cannot identify autism. Leung and Zakzanis, 2014

Are executive-function differences the same as autistic inertia?

Autistic inertia is a term used to describe difficulties initiating, stopping, or changing activities. It may overlap with executive-function processes, but the term's operational boundaries and mechanisms are still under investigation. A precise assessment asks what happens during task initiation or transition rather than assuming an established single cause.

Can practice or therapy improve everyday planning?

Structured coaching, practical skills training, and individually chosen accommodations may help some autistic adults. Small intervention studies and a randomized trial provide encouraging results for selected programs and populations. The overall evidence remains insufficient to promise a particular outcome for every autistic adult. Improving adaptive behaviors through executive function training, 2023 NICE CG142

What is the first useful step when daily demands become unmanageable?

Start with a concrete account of which activity is difficult, when the difficulty occurs, and what environmental or health factors have changed. A qualified professional can evaluate persistent functional impairment, new or worsening difficulties, and co-occurring mental or physical conditions. Support planning should begin with the adult's own goals and preferences.

Related Articles

Cluster Autism and Adult Neurodiversity — the scientific research chapter connecting diagnostic, cognitive, sensory, and participation research.

Executive Functions: Inhibition, Working Memory, and Flexibility — foundational cognitive mechanisms shared across many conditions.

AuDHD: What It Means to Have Both Autism and ADHD — the clinical and everyday implications of co-occurring autism and ADHD.

Anxiety and Autism: Comorbidity, Uncertainty, Sensory Stress, and Assessment — anxiety-related conditions and their interaction with autistic experience.

Autistic Burnout: Signs, Causes, Recovery, and What the Evidence Says — the developing evidence around exhaustion and changes in functioning.

Autistic Unmasking: What It Means and Whether It Is Always Helpful — identity, adaptation, and personal context.

References

An intervention program targeting daily adaptive skills through executive function training for adults with autism spectrum disorder: A pilot study. (2021). PubMed Central

Demetriou, E. A., DeMayo, M. M., and Guastella, A. J. (2019). Executive function in autism spectrum disorder: History, theoretical models, empirical findings, and potential as an endophenotype. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, 753. DOI

Demetriou, E. A., Lampit, A., Quintana, D. S., et al. (2018). Autism spectrum disorders: A meta-analysis of executive function. Molecular Psychiatry, 23, 1198–1204. DOI

Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135–168. DOI

Improving adaptive behaviors for autistic adults without intellectual disability through executive function training. (2023). Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 84, 103579. DOI

Johnston, K., Murray, K., Spain, D., Walker, I., and Russell, A. (2019). Executive function: Cognition and behaviour in adults with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 49, 4181–4192. DOI

Leung, R. C., and Zakzanis, K. K. (2014). Brief report: Cognitive flexibility in autism spectrum disorders: A quantitative review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. PubMed

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2012; updated). Autism spectrum disorder in adults: Diagnosis and management (CG142). Official recommendations

Profiling planning skills and cognitive flexibility of adults with autism spectrum disorders: Preliminary results from an exploratory service-based study. (2022). PubMed

Prospective memory performance of autistic adults in everyday life: The role of stress and motivation. (2025). Autism Research. PubMed Central

Yon-Hernández, J. A., Canal-Bedia, R., Wojcik, D. Z., et al. (2023). Executive functions in daily living skills: A study in adults with autism spectrum disorder. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1109561. DOI