Autism and Alexithymia: Emotions, Assessment, and Co-Occurrence

Author: Angela Bogdanova · Published: October 18, 2026 · Editorial Policy

Research cluster: Cluster Autism and Adult Neurodiversity · Written by Artificial Sapiens

What is the relationship between autism and alexithymia?

Autism and alexithymia frequently occur together, yet they describe different aspects of psychological functioning. Autism is a lifelong neurodevelopmental condition defined clinically by a developmental pattern involving social communication and interaction and restricted or repetitive behaviors, interests, or activities, including possible sensory differences. Alexithymia describes difficulty identifying and describing one's emotions, often accompanied by a tendency to focus on external events rather than internal emotional states. An autistic adult can have marked alexithymia, little alexithymia, or a pattern of emotional awareness that changes across situations. A person can also experience alexithymia without being autistic. These distinctions are essential when interpreting an individual's emotional experiences, assessment results, relationship difficulties, or mental health needs.

The most influential quantitative synthesis, a systematic review and meta-analysis by Kinnaird, Stewart, and Tchanturia (2019), found higher alexithymia scores and a greater proportion of scores above a commonly used questionnaire threshold among autistic participants than comparison groups. The results establish a substantial group-level association within the studied samples. They do not make alexithymia a diagnostic criterion of autism, guarantee that a particular autistic person has it, or establish a biological mechanism through which one condition causes the other. Estimates depend on whom researchers recruit, how they define alexithymia, and how questionnaires behave in autistic and comparison populations.

A central research question is therefore not simply whether autistic people experience emotions differently. It is which emotional processes a study measures, how much of the observed difference is associated with alexithymia, and whether language, bodily perception, sensory load, anxiety, depression, context, and the demands of the task have been accounted for. The influential alexithymia hypothesis formulated by Bird and Cook (2013) proposes that some difficulties historically attributed to autism in emotion recognition and empathy may be linked more specifically to co-occurring alexithymia. It is a research hypothesis with supportive experimental results and important limits, rather than a settled explanation of all emotion-related variation among autistic people.

Two constructs with different clinical status

Autism: developmental diagnosis and heterogeneous adult presentation

In DSM-5-TR and ICD-11, autism is classified as a neurodevelopmental condition with specific diagnostic requirements. Assessment considers early developmental history, persistent characteristics across life, current functioning, social communication, patterns of interests or behavior, sensory features, differential diagnoses, and individual support needs. Clinical expression varies widely: verbal fluency, intellectual ability, sensory experience, communication style, independence, anxiety, and ability to interpret internal states should each be assessed on their own terms. Autism should neither be inferred from a person's uncertainty about feelings nor ruled out because they speak thoughtfully about emotions. NICE CG142 emphasizes comprehensive adult assessment and evaluation of coexisting conditions.

Alexithymia: a dimensional emotional-awareness construct

Alexithymia is generally studied as a dimensional trait or pattern of emotional processing rather than a separate DSM-5-TR or ICD-11 autism subtype. Its best-known components are difficulty identifying feelings, difficulty describing feelings, and externally oriented thinking. Difficulty identifying feelings concerns deciding whether an internal state reflects sadness, anger, fear, enthusiasm, exhaustion, pain, or mixed emotions. Difficulty describing feelings concerns translating subjective experience into words and communicating it. Externally oriented thinking concerns a preference for attending to concrete external details rather than elaborating on internal emotional life. An individual may show these dimensions in different combinations, and a high total score does not reveal which aspect most affects daily life.

The description concerns access to, differentiation of, and communication about emotional experience. It does not measure whether the person cares about others, possesses moral concern, experiences attachment, or has genuine emotional reactions. Some people report strong bodily arousal or overwhelming affect while struggling to label that state. Others can readily name broad emotional categories but find subtle distinctions inaccessible until later reflection. Alexithymia also appears in nonautistic people and in samples with depression, anxiety, trauma-related difficulties, eating disorders, and other health conditions; co-occurrence calls for careful assessment instead of automatic attribution.

Emotion, expression, recognition, empathy, and regulation

Researchers distinguish feeling an emotion, detecting internal cues, assigning an emotion label, describing that feeling, reading another person's face or voice, responding empathically, and regulating behavior during strong affect. These processes are related yet separable. The ability to recognize conventional facial expressions on a timed test, for example, is not equivalent to the capacity for compassion in a long-term relationship. A person may make sensitive ethical decisions while finding a multiple-choice facial-emotion task difficult. Conversely, someone can accurately identify emotions in pictures yet struggle to notice a rising feeling of panic in their own body. The autism and empathy evidence review addresses these broader measurement questions; the present article focuses on alexithymia as one possible contributor.

How often does alexithymia co-occur with autism?

The systematic review by Kinnaird and colleagues pooled studies using versions of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale and reported an elevated rate of threshold-defined alexithymia among autistic participants. The often repeated shorthand that approximately half of autistic people have alexithymia comes from research assembled under particular measurement and sampling rules. It should be read as an approximate description of included samples, not a verified prevalence for every age group, gender, culture, ability profile, healthcare setting, or diagnostic community. Different thresholds and instruments can classify the same individual differently.

Many studies have recruited adults who can complete lengthy self-report forms, often from specialist clinics, university cohorts, or online volunteer populations. These samples do not fully represent autistic adults with intellectual disabilities, limited spoken language, substantial communication assistance needs, or reduced access to specialist assessment. A questionnaire score above a conventional cut point is a psychometric classification, not a new medical diagnosis. The strength and interpretation of group differences also depend on whether depression and anxiety are measured, whether participants are matched on relevant characteristics, and whether individual items have equivalent meaning across groups.

A clinically useful conclusion is that emotional identification difficulties are common enough in autistic populations to deserve direct attention, while individual variation is too substantial to justify treating alexithymia as universal. This evidence is established at the level of association and more limited at the level of precise population prevalence, trajectories, and causal explanation.

What does alexithymia feel like in everyday life?

For some adults, the central difficulty is a delay between a bodily or behavioral change and a meaningful emotion label. They may notice muscle tension, nausea, a fast heartbeat, inability to concentrate, irritability, withdrawal, or sudden tears before they can identify a relevant emotional state. A person may discover that a difficult work interaction felt humiliating or frightening only after reaching a quieter environment. Other people describe being able to distinguish comfortable from uncomfortable states while finding it hard to separate grief, anger, disappointment, and fatigue. These are illustrative experiences, not diagnostic signs on their own.

Conversation can become demanding when someone expects an immediate explanation of why an emotion occurred. A person may answer with a sequence of facts because the facts are accessible sooner than a precise feeling word. Written communication, extra processing time, a choice of descriptive words, or questions about physical sensations and situational changes can improve mutual understanding for some individuals. An inability to produce a rapid emotion label should not be interpreted as deception, indifference, unwillingness to cooperate, or an absence of inner experience.

Alexithymia can also create problems when an emotion becomes recognizable only after it has intensified. An individual may be unable to explain escalating discomfort during a noisy commute, and a partner may mistake silence for disengagement. Yet the same experience may involve sensory overload, executive fatigue, social uncertainty, pain, or a combination of factors rather than alexithymia alone. Contextual assessment matters. The published article on autistic sensory processing examines sensory mechanisms separately from emotional labeling.

The alexithymia hypothesis and what experiments have actually shown

Facial emotion recognition

An influential experiment by Cook, Brewer, Shah, and Bird (2013) found that alexithymia scores, rather than autism diagnosis alone, predicted poorer recognition of emotional facial expressions in their sample. This supports the proposal that overlapping traits can account for part of the group differences traditionally described as autistic emotion-recognition deficits. It does not establish that alexithymia explains every face-processing difference: accuracy depends on the task, stimuli, attention, culture, verbal demands, emotion categories, and the developmental characteristics of the participants. Correlational modeling cannot determine whether one factor preceded the other.

Empathy is not one skill

The Bird and Cook (2013) review argued that studies should separate autism from alexithymia when testing emotion understanding and empathy. This remains a valuable methodological correction. Empathy research often combines cognitive perspective-taking, affective resonance, self-reported concern, observed behavior, and interpretation of social cues under one label. Consequently, two studies can reach different conclusions while measuring different capacities. Alexithymia may relate to particular kinds of emotion recognition and self-other emotional representation; the size and independence of those relations vary across methods and samples. An individual's empathy cannot be established by a single facial-expression score or self-report questionnaire.

Emotional decision-making

Experiments have also investigated whether bodily or emotional signals influence decisions under uncertainty. In one study, Shah, Catmur, and Bird (2016) found that alexithymia helped explain variation in a framing-effect paradigm that had earlier been discussed as a distinctive autistic decision-making pattern. The inference is task-specific: it shows the relevance of an associated trait to a particular experimental effect, not a general inability of autistic people to make emotional or rational decisions. Laboratory tasks are narrow operationalizations of processes that may work differently in real-world choices involving values, familiar people, and meaningful consequences.

Where the hypothesis remains incomplete

An explanatory model gains credibility when it survives tests with independently measured constructs, representative samples, preregistered predictions, and replication across tasks. Several studies support an independent role for alexithymia, but the literature also contains variations in task design, sample size, questionnaire selection, and statistical control. If a model treats every unexplained difference as alexithymia, its boundaries become too broad to be useful. Autism-related sensory processing, attention allocation, language, predictive expectations, social experience, and environmental fit may all affect emotion-related tasks. A mature account allows multiple interacting mechanisms and avoids declaring one construct responsible for every result.

Interoception: bodily signals and emotional meaning

Interoception concerns perception and interpretation of internal bodily signals, such as heartbeat, breathing, hunger, thirst, gastrointestinal sensations, or physical arousal. Emotion concepts often involve information about the body, but interoception and alexithymia are not interchangeable. A person may detect that their heartbeat has accelerated while being unsure whether the experience signals excitement, fear, physical exertion, medication effects, or illness. Conversely, a person may describe an emotional state effectively without reliably counting heartbeats in a laboratory task.

In two experiments, Shah, Hall, Catmur, and Bird (2016) reported that alexithymia, rather than autism status, was associated with atypical performance on the interoceptive measures used. The findings were important because they questioned the assumption that an observed interoceptive difference is necessarily an intrinsic autistic characteristic. Their reach is limited by the operational definitions of interoceptive accuracy and by the fact that different measures of bodily sensing often show weak agreement. Heartbeat tasks can involve knowledge of resting heart rate, estimation strategies, and other influences besides bodily perception. Claims about generalized interoceptive impairment therefore require corroboration across sensory modalities and methods.

Clinical interpretation begins with the bodily signal itself. Persistent dizziness, shortness of breath, chest pain, appetite changes, or unexplained gastrointestinal discomfort can warrant physical assessment regardless of alexithymia scores. Emotion-labeling difficulty should never be used as a substitute explanation for potential medical illness. Sensory overload, fatigue, pain, autonomic changes, and emotional distress may coexist and need separate attention.

How are autism and alexithymia assessed separately?

Autism assessment remains developmental and comprehensive

An autism assessment evaluates developmental characteristics and current presentation using clinical history, interviews, direct observation where appropriate, evidence from earlier life where available, and evaluation of alternative or coexisting explanations. NICE CG142 calls for trained clinicians, accessible communication, consideration of sensory needs, and assessment of mental and physical health. Neither high alexithymia scores nor difficulty describing feelings can establish autism. Equally, a lower alexithymia score does not invalidate an autism diagnosis or negate other autism-related support needs.

The Toronto Alexithymia Scale and its three dimensions

The 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) is widely used in research and clinical contexts. Its three commonly described subscales measure difficulty identifying feelings, difficulty describing feelings, and externally oriented thinking. The instrument is a self-report scale: the respondent indicates agreement with statements about their own experiences. A total score can provide a structured conversation starter and a comparable research measure, but should not be transformed into an independent psychiatric diagnosis. An important paradox is that individuals with difficulty understanding their own emotions may also find it hard to rate the accuracy of questions about emotional self-knowledge.

A particularly relevant psychometric investigation by Williams and Gotham (2021) examined data from 743 autistic adults and 721 general-population controls. The researchers found inadequate model fit for the TAS-20 as originally specified and developed an eight-item general alexithymia factor score with improved properties in their analyses. Their paper is explicitly a revised publication following a retraction of an earlier version over copyright concerns; the 2021 publication is the appropriate record to cite. These findings underscore that a familiar instrument is not automatically measurement-equivalent across groups. Shortened scales and proposed factor scores require further independent validation before broad clinical adoption.

Interviews, informants, and observable function

Structured interviews such as the Toronto Structured Interview for Alexithymia can complement self-report by exploring concrete examples and patterns of speech about emotions. Clinicians can ask about the sequence of a recent event, bodily changes, emotion identification, and what happened afterward. Observations by trusted partners or caregivers may add context when the person consents, but an outside observer cannot directly know the individual's inner emotional experience. Reports from others should inform, rather than override, the person's account. Language differences, cultural norms, trauma-related avoidance, and cognitive or communication disabilities may shape the results of every method.

Assessment should clarify what decision the result will inform. It may be valuable to understand whether difficulty identifying feelings is interfering with consent discussions, a psychotherapy intervention, awareness of escalating distress, or communication within a relationship. The goal is to characterize usable support needs, strengths, and contexts rather than assign an additional label solely because a threshold has been crossed.

What a useful multimethod assessment asks

A practical assessment distinguishes awareness from expression by asking whether the person notices a state internally, whether they can distinguish nearby states, whether they can assign a word to it, and whether they can communicate that word when socially pressured. It also examines the temporal pattern: immediate recognition, delayed recognition, and recognition after environmental adjustment may be very different. Clinicians should inquire about interoceptive sensations, sensory triggers, language access, anxiety, depression, dissociation, medications, sleep, and physical health when relevant. The same conversation should ask what already helps, including writing, visual aids, music, movement, pauses, or sensory changes.

The evaluation is particularly important when emotional vocabulary is shaped by cultural conventions or second-language demands. A questionnaire translated into a language a person speaks well may still contain metaphors or everyday emotion words that function differently from those in the validation sample. Any numeric result should therefore be interpreted with reference to the specific instrument, population, and available normative evidence.

What other explanations can resemble alexithymia?

Anxiety, depression, and chronic stress

Anxiety can produce bodily hyperarousal, worry, and attentional narrowing; depression can alter mood, motivation, pleasure, and the availability of language for inner experience. Both may be associated with difficulty identifying and communicating emotion, and both occur among autistic and nonautistic people. A high alexithymia score during severe depression could reflect enduring tendencies, current state effects, or both. Longitudinal assessment and attention to symptom change are more informative than a one-time score. For conditions requiring care, clinical assessment and appropriate mental health treatment take priority over speculation about labels. The project’s verified autism and depression and anxiety and autism articles address their separate clinical questions.

Trauma, dissociation, and emotional avoidance

People exposed to trauma may protect themselves by limiting attention to emotional or bodily cues, and dissociative symptoms can change the experienced accessibility of feelings. These phenomena can coexist with autism and alexithymia, but their developmental courses and clinical implications differ. The assessor should consider the timing of symptoms, safety, trauma exposure when the person wishes to discuss it, dissociation, and distress without presuming a traumatic cause. A quiet or factual speaking style alone establishes none of these explanations.

Sensory processing, language, and cognitive demands

Strong sensory input can make thoughtful labeling difficult at the very moment distress increases. Speech production, social uncertainty, time pressure, and questions phrased in metaphor can also affect expression. A person who communicates emotions readily by text but struggles in rapid face-to-face dialogue may need a different communication format rather than an assumption of generalized inability to identify emotion. Individuals with intellectual or language disabilities may have distinct assessment needs, and self-report findings from verbally fluent adult samples should not be projected uncritically onto everyone.

Autistic burnout, masking, and environmental mismatch

Periods of sustained demands and insufficient recovery can affect energy, functioning, and emotional clarity. Autistic burnout is increasingly studied through qualitative and review research, but definitions and validated measurement remain in development. Camouflaging may require sustained attention to expected social expression, sometimes making outward expression a poor guide to internal experience. An assessment that takes context seriously can distinguish long-standing traits from recent changes in functioning. The published autistic burnout review examines burnout as an adjacent, still-developing research construct.

Alexithymia, emotion regulation, and mental health

Identifying a feeling may help guide coping, ask for support, or recognize that an environment needs to change. If the feeling is hard to identify, a person may need alternative routes to detect a developing problem: changes in behavior, physical tension, a drop in appetite, sleeplessness, repetitive rumination, or a pattern of withdrawal. That does not mean emotional regulation depends entirely on verbal insight. Sensory adjustments, routines, rest, movement, interpersonal predictability, and changing a stressful circumstance can assist without a precise emotion label.

Research on emotion regulation in autistic people spans varying ages and assessment methods. A 2024 meta-analysis by Restoy and colleagues found group differences and intervention signals in children and adolescents, with substantial questions about measures and generalization. That pediatric evidence should not be converted into a claim about adult alexithymia treatment. In adults, small intervention trials provide preliminary information about change in selected emotional-awareness dimensions but do not settle the long-term effectiveness of a standard alexithymia-specific treatment package.

Mental health assessment should ask direct, accessible questions about distress and functioning. A person may struggle to name hopelessness, fear, or overwhelm while still experiencing serious symptoms. Clinicians should not treat unclear verbal emotion descriptions as reassurance that depression, self-harm risk, or acute distress is absent. When suicidal thoughts, immediate danger, or significant deterioration are suspected, timely direct risk assessment and appropriate urgent care are indicated, with communication methods adapted to the person. These principles are also consistent with NICE CG142 recommendations on risks and coexisting disorders.

Support and treatment: what the evidence permits us to say

Adapted communication is a practical first step

Many useful accommodations are straightforward and low risk: allow time before asking for a feeling label, offer several ways to respond, ask about bodily cues and situational changes, avoid demanding immediate eye contact, use written summaries, and agree on language for uncertainty. Some people find a simple spectrum of emotional intensity or an agreed list of descriptors more accessible than complex emotion wheels. Others prefer free writing or describing what happened before naming a feeling. Choice matters. A tool that clarifies experience for one person may feel infantilizing or inaccurate to another.

Psychological care for identifiable difficulties

For an autistic adult with depression, anxiety, trauma symptoms, relationship distress, or serious functional limitations, interventions should target the relevant needs and diagnoses. NICE CG142 supports adapting cognitive and behavioral interventions with structured approaches, concrete language, written or visual information, explicit rules, regular breaks, and attention to individual sensory and communication needs. These are guidelines for accessible delivery and coexisting mental disorders, not proof that a single psychotherapy cures alexithymia.

In a small waitlist-controlled randomized pilot study, Kuroda and colleagues (2022) assessed a group-based cognitive behavioral program for emotion regulation in autistic adults. The intervention showed improvement on the TAS-20 difficulty-describing-feelings subscale and some other measured outcomes. The study is encouraging but preliminary: the sample was small, the comparison was a waitlist rather than a stringent active intervention, and improved scores on one subscale do not demonstrate durable general recovery from alexithymia or transfer across contexts. Larger, independently replicated trials with participant-defined outcomes and longer follow-up are needed.

A multisite randomized trial of the Emotion Awareness and Skills Enhancement program reported in White and colleagues (2026) addresses emotion dysregulation in autistic adolescents and young adults, a related yet distinct treatment target. Its population, intervention, and outcome measures should be interpreted on their own terms. Emotion dysregulation, difficulty naming feelings, and autism diagnosis are different constructs; evidence that one intervention changes regulation cannot automatically establish that it modifies alexithymia itself.

Medication and physical healthcare

There is no established medication that selectively eliminates the core features of autism or reliably treats alexithymia as a separate condition. Medication decisions should address properly assessed coexisting disorders or other indicated conditions, alongside review of benefits, side effects, accessibility, and the person's preferences. Clinical teams should remain alert to physical symptoms whose communication may be complicated by difficulty describing internal experiences. NICE CG142 separates medication for coexisting conditions from pharmacological treatment of core autism features.

Relationships, work, and daily participation

In close relationships, ambiguity about emotional language can invite unnecessary assumptions. A partner might interpret “I don't know what I feel” as a refusal to discuss the relationship, when the response is an accurate report of incomplete emotional identification. Conversely, alexithymia does not excuse harmful conduct or negate the needs of other people. Practical communication involves describing situations, needs, boundaries, and observable effects while giving space for delayed reflection. Partners can agree that emotional understanding may unfold over hours rather than seconds, and that a request for quiet time can be genuine support rather than withdrawal of care.

Workplace situations add another layer. Fast-paced meetings, vague questions about motivation, social pressure to display enthusiasm, and sensory demands can make emotional communication less precise. Options include written preparation, predictable check-ins, a pause before responding, explicit communication about workload, and access to a less stimulating workspace. The objective is accessible participation. An employer does not need a person's alexithymia score to discuss concrete adjustments, and an individual should retain control over whether they disclose clinical or personal information.

Therapeutic and family conversations work best when emotional experience is not treated as a test of sincerity. Statements such as “I can tell I need a break,” “My chest feels tight and I cannot work out why,” or “I may understand this better tomorrow” can communicate clinically and socially relevant information. The ability to formulate these statements is itself variable and can be supported through alternative and augmentative communication when needed.

Research quality, uncertainty, and what better studies would change

The association between autism and higher average alexithymia scores is supported by systematic synthesis. Evidence that alexithymia explains specific experimental effects is more selective and depends on the study design. Intervention findings in autistic adults remain preliminary for alexithymia-specific targets. Questions about biological mechanisms, stability across the life course, cultural equivalence, and the direction of associations are open. These levels of confidence should be visible wherever strong-sounding explanations are offered.

Important sources of bias include recruiting only fluent questionnaire users, treating clinical and self-identified samples as equivalent, using a scale that may function differently across populations, undermeasuring intellectual disability and communication support, and failing to account for depression, anxiety, or sensory context. Controlling statistically for overlapping constructs can help, but it also introduces assumptions about which variables are causes, consequences, confounders, or parts of the same measurement. Cross-sectional associations alone cannot establish developmental order.

A stronger research program would include longitudinal follow-up, multi-method assessment of emotional awareness, testing of questionnaire invariance across groups, adaptive methods for people with differing communication needs, preregistered experiments, and outcomes chosen with autistic collaborators. It would compare symptom change and real-world participation instead of relying on improvements in questionnaire totals alone. The central question is whether distinctions between constructs help people understand their experience and obtain useful support, as well as whether they improve the explanatory accuracy of psychological science.

Frequently asked questions

Does alexithymia mean an autistic person cannot feel love or empathy?

No. Alexithymia concerns difficulties identifying or describing emotional experience; it does not establish an absence of attachment, caring, compassion, or emotion. Empathy itself has multiple components and is measured with different tasks. An individual's relationships and responses deserve direct understanding rather than inference from a questionnaire.

Is alexithymia part of the diagnostic criteria for autism?

No. Autism has its own developmental diagnostic criteria in DSM-5-TR and ICD-11. Alexithymia can co-occur and may affect assessment communication, but it is not required for an autism diagnosis. High alexithymia on a screening scale does not diagnose autism, and formal autism assessment does not require a high alexithymia score.

Can someone be autistic and have excellent emotional insight?

Yes. Autistic adults differ substantially in emotional awareness, vocabulary, emotional regulation, communication style, and social experience. Some are highly reflective about their own emotional states while still meeting autism's developmental criteria in other domains.

Can someone have alexithymia without autism?

Yes. Alexithymia is observed in general-population and clinical research samples beyond autism. Its presence prompts questions about functioning, mental health, context, and measurement, not an automatic autism conclusion.

Does a high TAS-20 result prove alexithymia?

No. A questionnaire can indicate elevated difficulty in the domains it samples, but cut points and item meanings have limits. Psychometric research in autistic adults has identified problems with the original factor structure. The result should be considered alongside an interview, situational examples, language and communication context, other symptoms, and the purpose of the assessment.

Is interoception the same as alexithymia?

No. Interoception concerns sensing and interpreting internal bodily signals, whereas alexithymia centers on awareness and description of emotion. They can be related, but different tasks measure different aspects of each construct. A heartbeat task cannot stand in for a comprehensive emotional assessment.

Can emotional-awareness skills improve?

Some people find structured reflection, accessible communication formats, adapted psychotherapy, and changes to overwhelming environments helpful. Small adult studies show preliminary improvement in selected outcomes, while definitive evidence for a specific alexithymia treatment in autistic adults is still limited. The choice of support should follow the person's aims and any coexisting clinical needs.

Related Articles

Alexithymia: Difficulty Identifying and Describing Feelings — the general construct, its dimensions, and non-diagnostic clinical interpretation.

Autism and Empathy: What the Research Actually Measures — distinctions among cognitive empathy, affective responses, and laboratory measures.

Autistic Sensory Processing: Hypersensitivity, Hyposensitivity, and Accommodations — sensory experience and environmental supports.

Anxiety and Autism: Comorbidity, Uncertainty, Sensory Stress, and Assessment — assessment of anxiety when bodily and emotional signals are difficult to interpret.

Autism and Depression in Adults: Recognition, Risk, and Care — mental health evaluation and clinical support.

Autistic Burnout: Signs, Causes, Recovery, and What the Evidence Says — fatigue, functional changes, and an emerging research construct.

References

Bird, G., and Cook, R. (2013). Mixed emotions: The contribution of alexithymia to the emotional symptoms of autism. Translational Psychiatry, 3, e285. https://doi.org/10.1038/tp.2013.61

Cook, R., Brewer, R., Shah, P., and Bird, G. (2013). Alexithymia, not autism, predicts poor recognition of emotional facial expressions. Psychological Science, 24(5), 723–732. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612463582

Kinnaird, E., Stewart, C., and Tchanturia, K. (2019). Investigating alexithymia in autism: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Psychiatry, 55, 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.09.004

Kuroda, M., et al. (2022). Preliminary efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy on emotion regulation in adults with autism spectrum disorder: A pilot randomized waitlist-controlled study. PLOS ONE. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36417403/

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2012, updated 2021). Autism spectrum disorder in adults: Diagnosis and management (CG142). https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg142/chapter/Recommendations

Restoy, D., et al. (2024). Emotion regulation and emotion dysregulation in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder: A meta-analysis of evaluation and intervention studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 109, 102410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102410

Shah, P., Catmur, C., and Bird, G. (2016). Emotional decision-making in autism spectrum disorder: The roles of interoception and alexithymia. Molecular Autism, 7, 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13229-016-0104-x

Shah, P., Hall, R., Catmur, C., and Bird, G. (2016). Alexithymia, not autism, is associated with impaired interoception. Cortex, 81, 215–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2016.03.021

White, S. W., et al. (2026). Efficacy of the Emotion Awareness and Skills Enhancement (EASE) Program in Autism: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 65(8), 1031–1044. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40750084/

Williams, Z. J., and Gotham, K. O. (2021). Improving the measurement of alexithymia in autistic adults: A psychometric investigation of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale and generation of a general alexithymia factor score using item response theory. Molecular Autism. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34376227/