ARFID vs Picky Eating: Differences, Red Flags, and Assessment
Author: Angela Bogdanova · Published: October 10, 2026 · Editorial Policy
Research cluster: Eating Disorders & Disordered Eating · Written by Artificial Sapiens
Picky eating and avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) can look remarkably similar: a person may eat only familiar foods, reject textures, become distressed at meals, or struggle with unfamiliar restaurants. The clinically important difference is the effect of the restriction on nutrition, growth, health, dependence on nutritional support, and everyday functioning. ARFID is diagnosed when a persistent eating disturbance is associated with clinically significant consequences and the full diagnostic criteria are met. A person can experience intense food selectivity without having ARFID; a person can also have ARFID while maintaining a weight that appears ordinary.
For a child, adolescent, or adult whose accepted foods are dwindling, whose eating causes persistent distress, or whose health or participation in life is affected, assessment is more informative than arguing over whether the person is “just picky.” The National Institute of Mental Health identifies restricted intake, worsening food selectivity, nutritional problems, changes in growth, and functional impairment among important ARFID-related signs. The 2024 clinical review of ARFID emphasizes that presentations and medical needs vary substantially.
ARFID vs Picky Eating: The Main Difference
“Picky eating” is a descriptive everyday expression for selective food preferences, reluctance to try unfamiliar food, or avoidance of certain flavors, textures, or appearances. It is common in childhood, may persist, and has no single universally accepted diagnostic definition. Many selective eaters obtain adequate nutrition and participate in family, school, and social life, even when menus are limited. Research reviews show that picky eating has variable persistence and nutritional effects, making any rigid food-count rule misleading (Taylor and Emmett, 2019; Taylor et al., 2015).
ARFID is a recognized feeding and eating disorder in DSM-5-TR and ICD-11. Its diagnostic assessment examines insufficient energy or nutritional intake together with at least one major consequence: significant weight loss or inadequate growth, clinically significant nutritional deficiency, dependence on oral nutritional supplements or tube feeding, or marked interference with psychosocial functioning. The presentation must also be evaluated in light of food availability, cultural practices, other mental disorders, and medical conditions. The restriction cannot be explained by body-weight or shape concerns characteristic of anorexia nervosa or bulimia nervosa. These features are summarized in Thomas and colleagues’ clinical review and Archibald and Bryant-Waugh’s evidence review.
The distinction is a clinical threshold based on consequences and context. Someone who dislikes vegetables but eats broadly enough, grows as expected, and can manage normal activities may be selective without a disorder. Someone who eats familiar foods only under extremely narrow conditions, cannot eat during a school day, requires prescribed supplements, or experiences serious nutritional compromise deserves an ARFID assessment even if they appear outwardly healthy.
Side-by-Side Comparison: What Clinicians Look For
Food preferences and eating patterns
Ordinary picky eating often involves reluctance to try new foods, particular dislikes, or preference for predictable meals. Some children reject a food one day and accept it another, and selective eating can be persistent. ARFID may involve a similarly narrow menu, but the restriction becomes clinically significant because it limits the amount or variety eaten enough to produce major consequences or impairment. Neither diagnosis nor urgency follows from counting “safe foods” alone.
Nutritional intake, weight, and growth
A picky eater may still meet energy and nutrient needs. In ARFID, intake can be insufficient in one or more critical ways. Some patients lose weight or fall away from their expected growth pattern; others have deficiencies despite stable weight; still others rely on prescribed oral supplements or enteral feeding to meet needs. For children, longitudinal height, weight, puberty, and developmental trajectory matter more than one measurement. The American Academy of Pediatrics clinical report and Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine position paper support contextual medical evaluation.
Distress and interference with daily life
Mild selectivity can make family meals inconvenient. ARFID may prevent attendance at school meals, travel, work lunches, celebrations, or eating away from home, or create substantial fear and family disruption. The diagnostic concept of marked psychosocial impairment means clinicians assess what the restriction prevents the person from doing, not merely whether others find the eating pattern unusual. Impairment can be important even when laboratory tests or weight are currently reassuring (Archibald and Bryant-Waugh, 2023).
Motivations for avoidance
Selective eaters may simply dislike certain foods or resist novelty. ARFID often involves intense sensitivity to sensory properties, fear of unpleasant consequences, limited interest in food or eating, or overlapping patterns. These are descriptive clinical presentations, not separate DSM diagnoses and not mutually exclusive categories. A person may have strong texture aversions alongside low appetite, or become increasingly restricted after a frightening eating experience (2024 review).
Change over time
Ordinary selectivity may fluctuate with age, familiarity, illness, and environment. Persistent picky eating does not automatically become ARFID, and a lengthy history by itself does not determine a diagnosis. Increasing restriction, loss of previously accepted foods, declining nutritional adequacy, or growing functional impairment calls for evaluation regardless of how long the pattern has existed. A longitudinal childhood study documented considerable persistence in selective eating without implying that every persistent case has an eating disorder (Mascola et al., 2010).
What ARFID Can Look Like: Three Overlapping Presentations
Sensory sensitivity
Food may feel intolerable because of texture, smell, temperature, appearance, or taste. The individual may accept only foods prepared in very consistent ways, struggle with mixed textures, or avoid entire categories. Sensory preferences occur throughout the population and are also common in neurodevelopmental conditions. Clinicians look for the nutritional and functional effects that place an individual within the ARFID diagnostic picture.
Fear of aversive consequences
A person may avoid eating because they fear choking, vomiting, abdominal pain, an allergic reaction, or another unpleasant event. The fear can follow an actual incident or arise without a clearly identifiable trigger. Evaluation should identify whether the principal difficulty is ARFID, a specific phobia, a medical swallowing problem, or a combination. Our related English article on choking phobia and its differential diagnosis addresses that separate clinical question.
Limited interest or low appetite
Some people rarely feel hungry, forget meals, find eating effortful, or become full quickly. Reduced intake can still cause significant nutritional problems and functional impairment without dramatic food aversion. Appetite changes can also arise from physical illness, gastrointestinal disorders, medication effects, depression, or other causes; clinicians consider these explanations before attributing the pattern to ARFID. The presentation framework is described in the 2023 assessment and treatment review.
ARFID Red Flags in Children and Teenagers
The following signs justify professional attention, particularly when several occur together or worsen over time. They guide decisions about assessment; none is a stand-alone diagnostic test.
Physical and nutritional signs
A child may have stalled expected growth, a notable change from their established growth curve, fatigue, lightheadedness, recurrent weakness, delayed pubertal development, or suspected nutritional deficiencies. Some exhibit constipation or other gastrointestinal problems, which require appropriate medical evaluation because symptoms may be both contributors to and consequences of restricted intake. Repeated reliance on supplements to replace meals warrants a clinical review. The AAP guidance recommends assessing growth trajectory and physical consequences rather than relying on appearance.
Behavioral and emotional signs
Families may observe increasing fear at mealtimes, panic when an unfamiliar food appears, distress at changes in packaging or preparation, meals lasting unusually long because eating is difficult, or a shrinking set of foods that feel manageable. A child may skip eating at school, avoid sleepovers, or withdraw from food-related activities. It is important to ask about the child's sensory or fear experience with curiosity rather than treating every refusal as deliberate opposition.
Developmental and family-context signs
Selective eating is common during early development, but a young child who cannot progress with age-appropriate feeding skills, consistently struggles to manage oral intake, or has marked family and social interference may need evaluation by a pediatrician and, where indicated, feeding specialists. An older child or teenager whose menu has become progressively narrower or whose eating compromises independence deserves the same attention. Even when nutritional measurements are acceptable, marked psychosocial impairment can matter clinically (Goday et al., 2019; Archibald and Bryant-Waugh, 2023).
Can Someone Have ARFID at a Normal or Higher Weight?
Yes. Body size cannot rule out ARFID. Some individuals consume enough energy from a limited range of foods to maintain their weight while lacking important nutrients or experiencing major interference with school, work, relationships, or routine activities. Others experience clinically important changes relative to their own prior growth or weight trajectory while remaining within a population reference range.
The converse is also important: low weight alone does not establish ARFID. Clinicians investigate other medical and psychiatric explanations. Eating disorder assessment and treatment decisions should not be made from a single BMI value, as emphasized by NICE NG69. In children, pediatric growth history and developmental context are essential.
ARFID in Adults: When “I've Always Been Picky” Deserves Assessment
Adults with ARFID may describe lifelong limited food preferences, reliance on familiar brands, distress in restaurants, difficulty traveling, avoidance of social or workplace meals, or fear-driven restrictions after a distressing event. Some have adapted their lives so successfully that other people underestimate the burden. Others become nutritionally compromised after illness, a change in routine, or loss of access to familiar foods.
ARFID is not restricted to childhood. The 2024 review discusses adult presentations and the growing, still developing research base. Clinicians evaluating adults should assess nutrition and medical symptoms, social interference, anxiety and neurodevelopmental history, medications, and competing explanations. Adult self-report screens can help identify possible problems but do not replace diagnostic assessment.
Does Autism, ADHD, or Sensory Sensitivity Mean ARFID?
Autistic people may have pronounced sensory preferences, a need for predictability, or feeding difficulties, but autism and ARFID are distinct clinical entities. A 2025 meta-analysis found elevated co-occurrence in studied groups, while also reporting substantial study heterogeneity. The evidence supports careful assessment, not an assumption that autism entails ARFID or that all selective eating in autistic people is pathological.
Clinical evaluation should respect sensory comfort, communication needs, food accessibility, and the individual's priorities while assessing actual nutritional and functional consequences. ADHD-related distraction, executive-function differences, medication-related appetite changes, anxiety, and other influences may complicate eating patterns. Overlap may call for coordinated support; the presence of another diagnosis should neither automatically create nor automatically exclude an ARFID diagnosis.
What Else Can Look Like ARFID? Differential Diagnosis
Anorexia nervosa, atypical anorexia, and bulimia nervosa
ARFID-related restriction is not driven by a desire to change body weight or shape or by weight/shape overvaluation. In anorexia nervosa, restrictive eating is associated with the disorder's specific weight- and shape-related psychopathology and diagnostic features; atypical anorexia nervosa involves substantial restrictive-eating pathology despite weight remaining within or above a normal range and is classified under OSFED. Bulimia nervosa has its own pattern involving recurrent binge-eating episodes and inappropriate compensatory behaviors. A person can have an evolving presentation, and clinicians investigate actual motives rather than deducing them from weight.
Medical and gastrointestinal conditions
Food allergies, celiac disease, inflammatory bowel disease, eosinophilic esophagitis, chronic reflux, persistent nausea, swallowing dysfunction, and painful gastrointestinal conditions may all contribute to food avoidance. A medical condition may fully explain a pattern, coexist with clinically significant ARFID, or create a learned avoidance that persists after the original illness improves. A medical history and examination help determine what must be investigated. Coughing or choking with meals, painful swallowing, or suspected aspiration especially merits appropriate medical and feeding or swallowing assessment (Goday et al., 2019).
Pediatric feeding disorder
Pediatric feeding disorder (PFD) is a multidisciplinary framework for impaired age-inappropriate oral intake associated with medical, nutritional, feeding-skill, or psychosocial dysfunction. Its assessment is particularly useful where oral-motor skills, swallowing safety, development, and medical conditions are central. PFD and ARFID can overlap, but clinicians need to identify the domains of dysfunction rather than assign both terms automatically. The 2019 consensus definition describes this framework; a 2026 expert consensus discusses psychological treatment commonalities across PFD and ARFID.
Phobias, anxiety, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, and trauma-related reactions
A specific fear of choking, vomiting, contamination, or another consequence can lead to avoidance of food. The primary diagnosis depends on the full symptom pattern, cause, and scope of impairment, and multiple conditions can coexist. A single frightening event does not automatically establish PTSD, and food anxiety does not by itself establish ARFID. Clinicians distinguish the feared outcome, broader anxiety profile, eating disturbance, and nutritional effects.
Depression, appetite changes, and circumstances of food access
Depression, medication adverse effects, sensory loss, illness, economic insecurity, and cultural or religious eating practices can affect food choices and intake. The ARFID assessment explicitly considers whether another condition or inadequate access explains the restriction and, when conditions coexist, whether the severity exceeds what would usually be associated with them. Respecting culturally appropriate diets and access barriers is integral to accurate assessment.
How Clinicians Assess ARFID vs Picky Eating
1. History and course
A clinician asks when eating difficulties began, what foods and textures are accepted, how the pattern changed, whether hunger or sensory distress is present, and whether there are fears of choking, vomiting, or pain. They ask what happens in different environments and what the person wishes were easier about eating. For children, the account includes the child's developmental and feeding history as well as caregiver observations. For adults, the history includes work and social effects.
2. Nutritional and medical assessment
Depending on circumstances, evaluation may include growth records or longitudinal weight history, vital signs, examination, review of food and fluid intake, dietary diversity, clinical signs of deficiency, and selected laboratory studies. Clinicians assess heart rate, blood pressure, dizziness or fainting, hydration, and medical issues that could explain or complicate eating. Tests are chosen for the specific presentation; no single blood test establishes ARFID, and apparently normal tests cannot dismiss functional impairment. The Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine identifies the importance of medical oversight in restrictive eating disorders.
3. Diagnostic interview and functional impact
Clinicians assess whether eating disturbance meets the required clinical consequences and exclusion criteria, including the absence of body-image-driven restriction as the primary explanation. The interview also evaluates how restriction affects school, work, social participation, travel, family life, and distress. The Pica, ARFID and Rumination Disorder Interview (PARDI) is one structured interview with emerging validation evidence in young people; trained interpretation within the full clinical assessment remains essential (PARDI validation study).
4. Screening questionnaires: useful signals, limited conclusions
Questionnaires such as the Nine Item ARFID Screen (NIAS) and PARDI-AR-Q may identify patterns worth investigating. They are screening or symptom-assessment tools, not substitutes for a clinical diagnosis. A 2025 community validation study found meaningful limitations in how positive screens corresponded to diagnostic interviews. NICE specifically warns against using screening tools alone to establish eating disorder status. Online scores should prompt discussion with qualified professionals when concerns exist, not a self-applied diagnostic label.
5. Team-based differential assessment
Depending on what emerges, a pediatrician or primary care clinician may work with an eating disorder clinician, registered dietitian, gastroenterologist, psychiatrist, speech-language pathologist, or occupational therapist with relevant feeding expertise. The aim is to identify nutritional and medical risk, the drivers of avoidance, any swallowing or feeding-skill problems, and the most appropriate level of care. The 2023 evidence review and 2026 consensus statement support integrated assessment adapted to the individual.
When to Seek Help—and When Help Is Urgent
Schedule a medical or specialized feeding/eating assessment when food variety is contracting, the person repeatedly skips meals because eating is frightening or difficult, growth or nutrient adequacy is uncertain, supplementation is replacing ordinary intake, or eating substantially interferes with school, work, relationships, or everyday life. For children, discuss concerns with a pediatrician who can review the growth trajectory. Adults can start with primary care or a clinician experienced in eating disorders. Early assessment is appropriate even without an obvious weight change.
Seek urgent medical attention for fainting, confusion, profound weakness, signs of serious dehydration, an unusually slow heartbeat, chest pain, or inability to maintain adequate food or fluid intake. Persistent choking or difficulty swallowing requires prompt medical evaluation. A person with marked malnutrition or prolonged very limited intake may require monitored nutritional rehabilitation; treatment planning should account for electrolyte disturbances and refeeding-related risks. Clinical guidance emphasizes that severity assessment goes beyond BMI (SAHM, 2022; NICE NG69).
If symptoms are severe or escalating, use local emergency services or an emergency department. The informational comparison in this article cannot determine an individual's immediate medical safety.
What Helps With Ordinary Picky Eating?
When nutritional status, development, and functioning are reassuring, families can approach selectivity through a predictable and supportive mealtime environment. Offer familiar, accessible foods alongside nonpressured opportunities to learn about other foods; listen to sensory dislikes; and keep eating from becoming a test of obedience. A person's readiness to tolerate an unfamiliar food can vary, and the relationship with eating matters. The review of childhood picky eating discusses parental pressure and the broader feeding context.
If selective eating is persistent or emotionally intense, it is reasonable to ask a pediatrician or dietitian for individualized support before it becomes a source of escalating family conflict. Strategies should suit age, medical history, sensory needs, and the individual's nutritional status. For a separate discussion of preference learning, see Picky Eating and Sweet Foods: Preference, Familiarity, and Exposure.
Ordinary food familiarization strategies should not be used as a substitute for professional assessment when medical or functional red flags are present. For a person with suspected ARFID, well-meant pressure, shaming, forced eating, or abrupt unsupervised attempts to broaden intake can amplify fear or overlook medical and swallowing risks.
How Is ARFID Treated?
ARFID care addresses the pattern of avoidance, any nutritional compromise, the person's medical stability, and the causes maintaining restriction. Treatment may involve coordinated medical monitoring, nutritional rehabilitation, psychological intervention, and feeding- or swallowing-specific support when needed. Therapy should be selected according to age, developmental profile, symptoms, and care setting.
Cognitive-behavioral approaches tailored to ARFID, structured behavioral interventions, and family-supported treatments show promise. Clinical work may address fear, sensory intolerance, avoidance, rigid expectations, and limited appetite using collaborative, supported approaches to expanding eating. A 2024 scoping review of 50 studies found common components such as supported food exposure, psychoeducation, anxiety management, and family involvement, but much of the evidence came from small or single-case studies. A 2026 consensus statement identifies individualized, supported exposure as a common psychological component across ARFID and pediatric feeding disorder, while noting areas in need of further research.
For children, caregiver involvement is often important, and treatment must account for development and family routines. For adults, work may include occupational and social functioning and longstanding avoidance patterns. When physical or nutritional compromise is significant, specialist medical and dietetic care is central. Medications may be used for selected co-occurring symptoms or circumstances by qualified clinicians; there is no single medication that reliably treats every ARFID presentation. The 2024 review of recent advances describes a promising but still limited treatment evidence base.
Improvement is measured across multiple domains: nutritional adequacy, medical stability, wider functional freedom, distress, flexibility, and the person's ability to participate in meaningful activities. A growing number of foods alone is an incomplete outcome measure.
Supporting a Child, Partner, or Friend With Food Avoidance
Start with the person's experience. Ask what makes eating hard: sensory discomfort, fear, nausea, lack of appetite, unpredictability, or something else. Keep language neutral, avoid criticizing appearance or appetite, and make practical arrangements that allow safe, adequate nourishment while evaluation proceeds. For children, caregivers can document changes in accepted foods and daily functioning and bring growth and relevant medical records to an appointment. Adults may benefit from documenting situations they avoid and what happens when their usual foods are unavailable.
Explain to the healthcare professional both the nutritional questions and the day-to-day cost of the problem. Someone who maintains weight but cannot eat during a full school or work day may still need help. If fear or shame makes disclosure difficult, offer to accompany the person to an appointment or help prepare a written account. Food-focused conflict should not become the principal way the family communicates about the problem.
What the Research Can—and Cannot—Tell Us
Picky eating research uses inconsistent definitions, caregiver reports, and varying ages; prevalence estimates and conclusions about persistence are therefore not interchangeable across studies (Taylor et al., 2015). ARFID is a comparatively recent diagnostic category, and its three commonly described presentations overlap. Observed associations with anxiety or autism do not show a single cause for every individual. The 2025 autism–ARFID meta-analysis reports considerable heterogeneity, limiting universal prevalence claims.
The treatment literature includes clinical cohorts, case series, expert consensus, and a smaller number of controlled trials. Promising interventions deserve individualized clinical use and stronger future evaluation, especially across ages, neurodevelopmental profiles, and diverse populations (Willmott et al., 2024; Archibald and Bryant-Waugh, 2023). This scientific picture supports early identification and careful treatment without inventing a simple food-count cutoff or implying that one short checklist can settle a complicated diagnosis.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I know if my child's picky eating is actually ARFID?
Look for meaningful consequences such as inadequate growth or nutrients, reliance on nutritional supplements, or marked interference with everyday functioning, alongside persistent eating avoidance or restriction. A pediatrician and feeding/eating specialist can assess diagnostic criteria and possible medical causes. A limited menu by itself is not a diagnosis.
How many foods can someone eat and still have ARFID?
There is no validated universal number of accepted foods that defines ARFID. Quantity and variety matter in relation to nutritional adequacy, development, medical risk, and functional impairment. Both a narrow and a comparatively wider food repertoire can require assessment depending on consequences.
Can you have ARFID without being underweight?
Yes. Nutrient deficiencies or major psychosocial impairment may occur at different body weights, and changes relative to a person's own growth history may be clinically significant. Weight cannot establish or exclude the diagnosis by itself.
Is ARFID a form of anorexia nervosa?
They are different recognized eating disorder diagnoses. ARFID avoidance is not motivated by the weight- or shape-related concerns central to anorexia nervosa. Clinicians explore the motives and complete symptom picture and assess for any overlapping or changing presentations.
Is ARFID caused by autism?
Autism and ARFID can co-occur, and sensory features may overlap. Autism does not automatically produce ARFID. The diagnostic question remains whether the eating pattern meets the clinical consequences and other criteria of ARFID. The available co-occurrence evidence is meaningful but heterogeneous.
Does ARFID always involve a traumatic choking event?
No. Fear after a frightening experience is one possible presentation, while sensory sensitivity and low interest in eating are also common clinical patterns. Several drivers may coexist, and many people report no precipitating choking event.
Is avoiding all vegetables enough for an ARFID diagnosis?
No. The range of avoided food groups is only part of the picture. A clinician considers nutritional status, impairment, medical explanations, and the full diagnostic criteria. A restrictive menu still merits nutritional review when adequacy is uncertain.
Can an adult develop ARFID?
Yes. ARFID occurs across the lifespan. Some adults describe childhood-onset difficulties; others develop significant avoidance later. Both deserve assessment if intake or functioning is compromised.
Can a questionnaire diagnose ARFID?
No. NIAS and PARDI-AR-Q can support screening or symptom characterization, but clinical interviewing and assessment of nutrition, functional impairment, and alternatives are necessary. A positive online result calls for professional evaluation rather than self-diagnosis.
Will someone simply outgrow ARFID?
Some childhood selective eating changes with age, but clinically significant nutritional compromise or functional impairment requires evaluation and, where appropriate, treatment. Waiting for improvement without checking medical and developmental effects can delay necessary care.
Which professional should assess suspected ARFID?
A primary care clinician or pediatrician can examine medical stability and refer to an eating-disorder or multidisciplinary feeding team. Depending on the presentation, dietetic, psychological, psychiatric, gastroenterology, and feeding or swallowing expertise may be needed.
What should I say if a family member dismisses the problem as “just picky”?
Describe observable effects rather than debate a label: changes in growth or energy, missed meals, nutritional concerns, fear, reduced school or work participation, or inability to eat outside a narrow setting. Ask for a medical assessment that examines both eating behavior and its consequences.
Related Articles
Choking Phobia: Fear of Choking, Eating Avoidance, and Differential Diagnosis — for fear-driven avoidance and a specific phobia differential.
Picky Eating and Sweet Foods: Preference, Familiarity, and Exposure — for ordinary food preference, familiarity, and exposure learning.
References
American Academy of Pediatrics. (2021). Hornberger, L. L., Lane, M. A., & Committee on Adolescence. Identification and management of eating disorders in children and adolescents. Pediatrics, 147(1), e2020040279. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-040279
Archibald, T., & Bryant-Waugh, R. (2023). Current evidence for avoidant restrictive food intake disorder: Implications for clinical practice and future directions. JCPP Advances, 3(2), e12160. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcv2.12160
Goday, P. S., et al. (2019). Pediatric feeding disorder: Consensus definition and conceptual framework. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, 68(1), 124–129. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000002188
Lukens, C. T., et al. (2026). Psychological treatment for pediatric feeding disorder (PFD) and avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID). International Journal of Eating Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.70101
Mascola, A. J., Bryson, S. W., & Agras, W. S. (2010). Picky eating during childhood: A longitudinal study to age 11 years. Eating Behaviors, 11(4), 253–257. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20850060/
National Institute of Mental Health. (n.d.). Eating disorders: What you need to know. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/eating-disorders
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2017, updated). Eating disorders: Recognition and treatment (NG69). https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng69/chapter/recommendations
Ortiz, S. N., et al. (2025). Validating online parent- and self-report screening methods for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder. International Journal of Eating Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24376
Sader, M., et al. (2025). The co-occurrence of autism and avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID): A prevalence-based meta-analysis. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 58(3), 473–488. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24369
Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. (2022). Medical management of restrictive eating disorders in adolescents and young adults. Journal of Adolescent Health, 71(5), 648–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.08.006
Taylor, C. M., & Emmett, P. M. (2019). Picky eating in children: Causes and consequences. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 78(2), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665118002586
Taylor, C. M., Wernimont, S. M., Northstone, K., & Emmett, P. M. (2015). Picky/fussy eating in children: Review of definitions, assessment, prevalence and dietary intakes. Appetite, 95, 349–359. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26232139/
Thomas, J. J., et al. (2023). Assessment and treatment of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder. Current Psychiatry Reports. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36640211/
Willmott, D., et al. (2024). A scoping review of psychological interventions and outcomes for avoidant and restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID). International Journal of Eating Disorders, 57(1), 27–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24073