Anxiety vs Fear: What Is the Difference?
Updated: Oct 8
Author: Ukrainian Psychological Hub · Published: September 30, 2026 · Editorial Policy
Fear and anxiety are closely related threat responses, but they are not interchangeable. In the most useful clinical distinction, fear is oriented toward a perceived threat that is present or immediately impending, whereas anxiety is oriented toward possible harm that is more distant, uncertain, ambiguous, or anticipated. The American Psychiatric Association summarizes the distinction as fear in response to an immediate threat and anxiety in anticipation of a future concern. The National Institute of Mental Health’s research framework similarly separates acute threat (fear) from potential threat (anxiety) on the basis of threat imminence and uncertainty.
That distinction is a guide, not a biological wall. Fear and anxiety can occur together, recruit overlapping defensive processes, produce many of the same bodily sensations, and shift into one another as a situation changes. Contemporary reviews have therefore warned against treating them as two perfectly separable systems. A major review by Daniel-Watanabe and Fletcher concludes that the distinction has been useful but is also an oversimplification, while a broad 2023 state-of-the-science review by Grogans and colleagues emphasizes the dimensional, context-sensitive nature of fear and anxiety.
The practical difference is therefore best understood through the structure of the threat: how close it feels, how certain it seems, what the person predicts will happen, and what defensive actions follow. This also prevents a common error: fear is not simply a response to a “real” danger while anxiety is a response to an “imaginary” one. Both can be triggered by accurate perceptions, mistaken interpretations, memories, internal bodily sensations, learned cues, or uncertain possibilities. What most consistently separates them is the relationship to threat, especially immediacy and uncertainty.
Anxiety vs fear at a glance
Threat timing
Fear is typically strongest when danger seems present, rapidly approaching, or unavoidable now. Anxiety is more characteristic when the person is preparing for something that might happen later or when the threat is difficult to locate precisely. A dog lunging toward you can produce fear. Worrying for days that you might encounter an aggressive dog on your usual route is more anxiety-like. The same topic can therefore generate fear at one moment and anxiety at another.
Threat certainty
Fear often accompanies a relatively clear perception that something dangerous is happening or about to happen. Anxiety more often grows around uncertainty: Will something go wrong? What if I cannot cope? What if a bodily sensation means danger? What if I am judged? This is why vigilance, scanning, rehearsal, and repeated prediction can become prominent in anxiety even when no immediate threat is visible.
Typical action tendency
Fear tends to organize urgent defensive action. Depending on the situation, that can include escape, freezing, fighting, seeking protection, or rapidly redirecting attention. Anxiety more often organizes preparation: monitoring, checking, planning, reassurance-seeking, avoidance, or staying ready for a possible threat. These patterns overlap. An anxious person can suddenly flee, and a frightened person can remain hypervigilant after the immediate danger has passed.
Time course
Fear can rise very quickly and may fall when the immediate threat ends, although the emotional and physiological aftermath can persist. Anxiety can be brief, but it is especially capable of becoming sustained because uncertainty can remain unresolved. A person may repeatedly imagine future outcomes, monitor for signs of danger, and alter behavior long after the original cue has disappeared.
Subjective experience
Fear is often experienced as alarm: “Something dangerous is happening.” Anxiety is often experienced as apprehension: “Something dangerous may happen.” Yet real experience is messier than a textbook sentence. People can describe an immediate threat as anxiety, use fear for future concerns, or experience a blended state in which urgent alarm and prolonged anticipation are both present. Everyday language is broader than research terminology.
What is fear?
Fear is an adaptive response to perceived danger. It helps prioritize information that matters for survival and rapidly coordinates attention, physiology, and behavior. The NIMH RDoC framework defines acute threat, labeled “fear,” as activation of defensive motivational systems that protect the organism from perceived danger. Importantly, the definition says perceived danger. Fear does not require a threat to be objectively present or accurately judged.
That point matters clinically. A smoke alarm can activate because there is a fire or because toast is burning; the alarm response is real in both cases even though the underlying situation differs. Human fear can likewise be appropriate to genuine danger, disproportionate to the actual risk, conditioned by prior learning, or triggered by internal sensations and mental representations. The existence of fear tells us that a threat has been represented as important. It does not by itself tell us whether the threat estimate is accurate.
Normal fear is indispensable. A person crossing a street when a car suddenly accelerates toward them should become alert and take protective action. The goal of clinical assessment is not to eliminate every fear response. It is to understand whether fear is proportionate to context, whether it is persistent when danger is absent, whether avoidance has become excessive, and whether the pattern causes significant distress or impairment.
What is anxiety?
Anxiety is a state of apprehension, vigilance, and preparation in relation to possible harm. The threat may be future, uncertain, ambiguous, low in probability, difficult to control, or only partly specified. In the NIMH RDoC framework, potential threat, labeled “anxiety,” involves possible harm that is distant, ambiguous, or uncertain and is associated with increased risk assessment and vigilance. This gives anxiety a prospective quality: attention is pulled toward what could happen next.
Anxiety can include worry, but the two terms are not identical. Worry is primarily a stream of thoughts, predictions, questions, and attempted problem solving. Anxiety is broader and can include emotion, bodily arousal, tension, attention changes, behavioral avoidance, and worry. Someone can feel a diffuse bodily sense of unease without a long verbal chain of worry, while another person may spend hours worrying with relatively little acute bodily arousal.
Anxiety also does not require the absence of a trigger. A person may know exactly what activates it: an upcoming examination, a social event, a flight, a medical appointment, separation from a caregiver, an uncertain work decision, or the possibility of another panic attack. Saying that anxiety is “fear without a cause” therefore misses many ordinary and clinical forms of anxiety. The more useful question is whether the threat is immediate or potential and how uncertainty is being processed.
The key difference is not real danger versus imaginary danger
One of the most repeated internet explanations says fear happens when danger is real and anxiety happens when danger is imaginary. That formulation is easy to remember and often wrong. A person can be frightened by a harmless shadow because it is perceived as a threat. A person can be anxious about a genuinely high-risk medical procedure scheduled for next week. The first case involves an inaccurate threat representation but a fear-like time horizon; the second involves a real threat but an anxiety-like anticipatory horizon.
Threat imminence, predictability, and uncertainty provide a stronger framework. Fear becomes more likely as danger feels close and action becomes urgent. Anxiety becomes more likely when the organism must operate under uncertainty, sustain vigilance, compare possible outcomes, and prepare before the danger is confirmed. Research traditions differ in exactly where they draw the line, which is one reason contemporary reviews resist a rigid categorical split.
Why fear and anxiety feel so similar in the body
Both fear and anxiety can change heart rate, breathing, muscle tension, sweating, gastrointestinal activity, attention, and the sense of readiness to act. They share many components because both belong to the broader family of responses to threat. The exact pattern varies with the person, the intensity of the situation, prior learning, context, medications, physical health, and many other factors. There is no single bodily sensation that reliably labels an experience as fear rather than anxiety.
This overlap is also why symptom matching alone is a weak way to diagnose an anxiety disorder. Palpitations, shortness of breath, dizziness, trembling, sweating, nausea, chest discomfort, and concentration difficulty can occur in anxiety-related states, but they can also occur for other psychological or medical reasons. The NIMH overview of anxiety disorders describes anxiety disorders as patterns that go beyond occasional fear or worry and interfere with daily life; it does not reduce diagnosis to a single physical symptom.
If physical symptoms are new, severe, unusual for you, or include signs such as significant chest pain, fainting, severe breathing difficulty, or new neurological symptoms, an online distinction between fear and anxiety cannot establish the cause. Those situations call for appropriate medical assessment rather than an assumption that anxiety explains the symptoms.
Are fear and anxiety different brain systems?
Older and still influential models often describe fear and anxiety through partially different neural circuits, sometimes associating rapid responses to imminent threat more strongly with amygdala-centered processes and sustained responses to uncertain threat with the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis. This research has been important, but a simple “fear circuit” versus “anxiety circuit” story no longer captures the state of the evidence.
In a widely cited two-system framework, LeDoux and Pine argued that conscious experiences of fear and anxiety should be distinguished from nonconscious defensive survival circuitry rather than assuming that activation of a defensive circuit automatically equals the subjective feeling. This is an important correction to popular neuroscience. The experience “I feel afraid” is a psychological state; defensive physiological responses are measurable biological processes; they interact, but they are not synonyms.
Later reviews push the caution further. Daniel-Watanabe and Fletcher found substantial inconsistencies in proposed neural, physiological, and behavioral distinctions, and Grogans and colleagues describe fear and anxiety as complex, multidimensional phenomena that vary with threat proximity, intensity, uncertainty, context, and individual differences. The safest scientific conclusion is that partially differentiated mechanisms exist within a heavily overlapping threat system. There is no clinically useful brain scan that can look at one person and simply declare, “this is fear, not anxiety.”
Earlier neurobehavioral work by Perusini and Fanselow also emphasized both the usefulness and the ambiguity of the distinction. For readers, the practical lesson is straightforward: neuroscience supports studying differences in threat processing, but it does not justify reducing two complex experiences to a pair of isolated brain structures.
How fear can turn into anxiety
Fear often becomes anxiety through learning and anticipation. Imagine a person who experiences an intense frightening event in an elevator. During the event, fear may dominate because the threat feels immediate. Afterward, the person may begin to anticipate another episode: “What if the elevator stops again?” That future-oriented prediction can produce anxiety hours or days before entering another elevator.
The person may then start monitoring for cues, taking stairs, checking escape routes, standing near doors, or asking others for reassurance. Some of these actions are reasonable in context. Others can become safety behaviors or avoidance strategies that reduce anxiety in the short term while preventing new learning about what happens without the protective routine. Whether that pattern reaches the threshold of a disorder depends on the specific symptoms, persistence, context, distress, impairment, and diagnostic requirements.
How anxiety can become acute fear
The direction can also reverse. A person may spend the morning anxious about a difficult conversation. That is an anticipatory state organized around a possible future outcome. When the conversation starts and the other person suddenly becomes threatening, the experience may shift toward immediate fear. The underlying topic did not change; the threat horizon did.
This is one reason it is misleading to ask whether a person “has fear or anxiety” as though only one can exist. Threat responses evolve over time. Anticipation can precede an encounter, acute fear can dominate during it, and anxiety can return afterward as the person reviews what happened and predicts what may happen next.
Fear, anxiety, worry, panic, stress, and avoidance
Worry
Worry is repetitive thinking about uncertain negative outcomes. It is strongly associated with anxiety, especially generalized anxiety, but it is not identical to anxiety. Worry is mainly cognitive; anxiety can also involve emotion, bodily arousal, vigilance, and behavior. A person can worry without meeting criteria for any disorder, and worry can occur in contexts other than anxiety disorders.
Panic
Panic refers to an abrupt surge of intense fear or discomfort with rapidly escalating physical and cognitive symptoms. A panic attack is an episode, not automatically a diagnosis. Panic attacks can occur in panic disorder, other anxiety disorders, other mental disorders, medical contexts, and sometimes without a psychiatric disorder. Panic disorder has its own diagnostic requirements involving recurrent unexpected panic attacks and subsequent concern or behavior change; it should not be treated as a synonym for “very strong anxiety.”
“Anxiety attack”
“Anxiety attack” is a common informal expression rather than a formal DSM-5-TR diagnostic term. People use it for many experiences: escalating worry, intense anxiety, a panic attack, feeling overwhelmed, or a period of physical arousal. Because the phrase has no single standardized clinical definition, the useful follow-up is to describe what actually happened: onset, duration, symptoms, triggers, thoughts, behavior, and recovery.
Stress
Stress and anxiety overlap but answer a different comparison. Stress describes responses to demands, pressures, or stressors; anxiety is more specifically organized around anticipated threat or harm. A stressful situation can generate anxiety, and anxiety can persist after a stressor has passed. The boundary is contextual rather than a simple either-or test, and a full stress-versus-anxiety differential requires its own analysis.
Avoidance and safety behavior
Avoidance means staying away from a feared or anxiety-provoking situation, object, sensation, thought, or activity. Safety behaviors are actions used to reduce perceived danger while remaining in or near the situation, such as repeated checking, carrying a particular object for reassurance, sitting near an exit, rehearsing every sentence, or relying on another person to make an encounter feel safe. Neither behavior proves the presence of an anxiety disorder. Their clinical significance depends on function, rigidity, persistence, and impact.
Normal fear and anxiety versus an anxiety disorder
Feeling fear or anxiety is not the same as having an anxiety disorder. Both emotions are part of normal human functioning. The World Health Organization states that everyone can feel anxious sometimes, whereas anxiety disorders involve fear or worry that is intense and excessive, difficult to control, persistent, distressing, and disruptive to daily life. The American Psychiatric Association likewise describes anxiety disorders as more persistent and impairing than occasional anxiety.
No single feature creates a universal threshold. Clinicians consider the pattern: what triggers the response, whether it is excessive or out of proportion in context, how long it has persisted, how much control the person has over worry or avoidance, what functional impairment results, and whether another mental or medical condition better explains the presentation. Different disorders have different diagnostic requirements, so “I feel anxious often” is a symptom description, not a diagnosis.
Screening questionnaires can estimate symptom severity or identify people who may benefit from further assessment, but a screening score is not the same thing as a formal diagnosis. Diagnosis involves history, symptom pattern, duration, impairment, exclusions, differential diagnosis, and clinical judgment. This distinction is especially important because anxiety-like symptoms can arise from many sources.
Fear and anxiety in DSM-5-TR and ICD-11
Current diagnostic systems recognize that fear and anxiety are deeply intertwined. In DSM-5-TR, the anxiety disorders chapter includes conditions such as generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, agoraphobia, specific phobia, social anxiety disorder, separation anxiety disorder, and selective mutism. The American Psychiatric Association’s current overview describes these disorders as sharing excessive fear, worry, nervousness, and related behavioral disturbance while differing in the situations, objects, or patterns that organize symptoms.
ICD-11 makes the connection especially explicit by naming the grouping “Anxiety or fear-related disorders.” The WHO ICD-11 Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Requirements provides the current clinical framework for this family and keeps distinct diagnostic territories for generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, agoraphobia, specific phobia, social anxiety disorder, separation anxiety disorder, selective mutism, and specified or unspecified categories.
This does not mean every condition involving fear or anxiety belongs to the anxiety-disorder family. Obsessive-compulsive disorder is classified within obsessive-compulsive and related disorders. Post-traumatic stress disorder belongs to disorders specifically associated with stress. Illness anxiety has its own diagnostic context. Attachment anxiety is a construct from attachment research, not an anxiety disorder diagnosis. Neuroticism is a personality trait dimension. Historical “anxiety neurosis” is a legacy concept rather than a current DSM-5-TR diagnosis. The emotion of anxiety travels across many psychological and medical contexts; diagnostic ownership depends on the syndrome, not on the presence of the word anxiety.
For readers encountering older terminology, our article Neurosis vs Anxiety Disorder: What Is the Difference? explains why historical neurosis language should not be mapped directly onto a modern anxiety diagnosis.
Fear is central to several anxiety disorders, but the pattern matters
Specific phobia is organized around marked fear or anxiety related to a particular object or situation, together with characteristic avoidance and clinical threshold requirements. Social anxiety disorder centers on fear or anxiety about social situations in which a person may be scrutinized or negatively evaluated. Agoraphobia involves fear or anxiety across characteristic situations where escape or help may feel difficult if incapacitating or panic-like symptoms occur. These are not interchangeable simply because fear appears in all of them.
Generalized anxiety disorder is more strongly organized around excessive, difficult-to-control worry and anxiety across multiple domains. Panic disorder is organized around recurrent unexpected panic attacks and their consequences. Separation anxiety disorder focuses on developmentally inappropriate and excessive fear or anxiety concerning separation from attachment figures. Selective mutism has its own specific pattern. A comparison page about fear and anxiety can clarify the emotional vocabulary, but it cannot replace disorder-specific diagnostic information.
Five examples that show the difference
A dog encounter
A dog suddenly breaks its leash and charges toward you. The threat feels immediate; fear is the dominant description. Two days later, you plan to walk past the same park and repeatedly imagine another dog charging. The threat is no longer present, but the possibility is active in your mind; anxiety is the stronger description. If you begin avoiding every park for months, the avoidance becomes an important part of the clinical picture, but it still does not by itself establish a diagnosis.
A presentation
The night before a presentation, you picture forgetting your words, being judged, or freezing in front of the group. That anticipatory state is anxiety-like. During the presentation, a sudden hostile interruption may produce a sharp fear response. In social anxiety disorder, the relevant issue is not simply that presentations feel unpleasant; it is a persistent pattern of marked fear or anxiety about social evaluation, avoidance or endurance with intense distress, and clinically significant impact.
A panic episode
A person experiences an abrupt surge of intense fear with palpitations, dizziness, trembling, and a sense that something terrible is happening. That may fit the phenomenology of a panic attack, but an online description cannot determine whether the episode is psychiatric, medical, substance-related, or due to another cause. Later, the person may develop persistent anxiety about having another episode. The acute surge and the anticipatory state are related but temporally different.
A medical appointment
A person awaiting biopsy results may feel intense anxiety even though the concern is grounded in a real medical uncertainty. This demonstrates why “anxiety equals imaginary danger” fails. The possible threat is real, but it is not yet resolved. When uncertainty is high and the outcome is delayed, anxiety is a normal possible response. Clinical significance depends on severity, persistence, impairment, coping, and the wider context.
A sudden storm
A severe storm warning arrives while you are outdoors and lightning strikes nearby. Immediate protective fear can be adaptive. After the storm ends, you may remain tense and monitor weather reports. If the next week is dominated by predictions that every cloud means imminent catastrophe, the state has shifted toward anticipatory anxiety. Whether that is transient learning after a frightening event or part of a disorder requires more information.
Can fear and anxiety happen at the same time?
Yes. The immediate and the possible can coexist. A person driving on an icy road may fear losing control in the next few seconds while also feeling anxious about the rest of the trip. A patient awaiting a procedure can be anxious about the outcome and frightened by a painful moment in the room. A person with social anxiety can anticipate judgment before an event and experience acute fear when attention suddenly turns toward them.
This coexistence is one reason researchers increasingly model threat responses along dimensions such as imminence, certainty, controllability, intensity, and duration rather than insisting that every episode belongs in one pure box. The words fear and anxiety remain clinically useful, but they work best as descriptions of patterns within a dynamic system.
Is anxiety a form of fear?
There is no single answer that settles every scientific tradition. Some theories treat anxiety as a particular organization of the broader defensive system, especially when threat is uncertain or distant. Other theories emphasize meaningful qualitative differences between fear and anxiety. Contemporary evidence supports both substantial continuity and useful distinctions. For public-facing clinical language, it is most accurate to say that fear and anxiety are closely related threat responses with overlapping mechanisms and characteristic differences in threat imminence and uncertainty.
That answer also avoids turning terminology into diagnosis. A person can experience frequent fear without having a fear-related disorder, and a person can experience anxiety without having an anxiety disorder. Emotions, symptoms, traits, screening results, and diagnoses are different levels of description.
What fear and anxiety do not tell you by themselves
Fear is not proof that danger is objectively present. Anxiety is not proof that danger is absent. Intensity is not a diagnosis. Avoidance is not a diagnosis. A high score on a screening questionnaire is not a diagnosis. A panic attack is not automatically panic disorder. A personality tendency toward negative emotionality is not the same as an anxiety disorder. A historical label such as anxiety neurosis should not be translated one-to-one into a current disorder.
These distinctions matter because everyday language often compresses several levels into one sentence: “I am anxious, so I have anxiety.” Clinically, that sentence may refer to a normal emotional state, a temporary stress response, a symptom of another condition, a recurring behavioral pattern, a trait-like tendency, or a diagnosable disorder. The correct level is established by context and assessment.
When to consider a professional assessment
Professional assessment becomes more relevant when fear or anxiety is persistent, difficult to control, markedly out of proportion to the situation, accompanied by substantial avoidance or safety behavior, or interfering with sleep, relationships, school, work, health care, travel, or ordinary activities. It is also appropriate when the person is unsure whether symptoms reflect anxiety, another mental health condition, medication or substance effects, or a medical issue.
A clinician can examine onset, duration, triggers, bodily symptoms, worry content, panic episodes, avoidance, impairment, developmental context, substance and medication use, medical history, and relevant differential diagnoses. The goal is not to decide whether the person is “really afraid” or “really anxious.” It is to identify the pattern that best explains the experience and to determine whether any clinical disorder is present.
What can help in the moment without turning a feeling into a diagnosis
A useful first step is to identify the threat horizon. Ask: Is something dangerous happening right now, or am I preparing for something that might happen? If danger is immediate, protective action comes first. If the threat is possible rather than present, it can help to separate what is known from what is predicted, notice how much uncertainty is driving the response, and observe whether checking, reassurance, or avoidance is narrowing behavior.
This is a way of organizing information, not a substitute for treatment. Persistent anxiety disorders are treated according to the specific disorder, severity, preferences, comorbidity, and clinical context. Evidence cannot be transferred automatically from one anxiety disorder to another, and educational material cannot select an individual therapy or medication regimen.
Frequently asked questions
What is the simplest difference between fear and anxiety?
Fear is usually oriented toward a perceived threat that is present or immediately impending. Anxiety is usually oriented toward possible future harm that is uncertain, ambiguous, or more distant. The distinction is useful but not absolute because the two responses overlap and can occur together.
Is anxiety just fear about the future?
That is a useful shorthand, but it is incomplete. Anxiety often includes anticipation of future threat, but it can also involve sustained bodily tension, uncertainty, vigilance, avoidance, and diffuse apprehension. Current research treats fear and anxiety as overlapping threat-related phenomena rather than two perfectly separate categories.
Can anxiety have a specific trigger?
Yes. Anxiety can be triggered by an upcoming event, a bodily sensation, a place, a social situation, uncertainty, separation, a memory, or the possibility of another frightening episode. Having a known trigger does not automatically make the response fear rather than anxiety.
Is fear always rational and anxiety irrational?
No. Fear can arise from a mistaken or exaggerated perception of danger, while anxiety can be a proportionate response to a genuine uncertain risk. Accuracy of the threat estimate and timing of the threat are separate questions.
Why can fear and anxiety cause the same physical symptoms?
Both mobilize overlapping systems involved in threat detection, arousal, attention, and defensive action. Heart rate, breathing, sweating, muscle tension, stomach sensations, and dizziness are therefore not exclusive to either state. Physical symptoms also have many possible non-anxiety causes, so symptoms alone cannot establish a psychiatric explanation.
What is the difference between fear and a phobia?
Fear is an emotion. A specific phobia is a clinical disorder defined by a persistent and marked pattern of fear or anxiety related to a particular object or situation, together with avoidance or endurance with intense distress and other diagnostic requirements. A strong dislike or occasional fear does not automatically equal a phobia.
Does having anxiety mean I have an anxiety disorder?
No. Anxiety is a normal human experience. An anxiety disorder is a clinical diagnosis based on a particular symptom pattern, persistence, severity, impairment, and diagnostic requirements. The WHO anxiety-disorders fact sheet and NIMH anxiety-disorders overview both distinguish ordinary anxiety from persistent, impairing disorders.
Can fear cause anxiety later?
Yes. A frightening experience can become the basis for later anticipation, vigilance, and avoidance. That does not mean every frightening event produces an anxiety disorder. Most fear responses occur within normal adaptation; the clinical question is what pattern develops over time.
Can anxiety turn into fear?
Yes. An uncertain future threat can become immediate. As threat proximity or certainty increases, an anticipatory state may shift toward acute fear. The transition can happen quickly and does not imply a change of diagnosis.
Is “anxiety attack” the same as a panic attack?
Not necessarily. Panic attack is a defined clinical phenomenon; “anxiety attack” is an informal phrase with no single standardized diagnostic meaning. Someone using the phrase may be describing a panic attack, a period of intense worry, escalating anxiety, or another experience. The actual symptom pattern matters more than the label.
Related Articles
References
American Psychiatric Association. What Are Anxiety Disorders? Psychiatry.org. Accessed September 30, 2026.
Daniel-Watanabe, L., & Fletcher, P. C. (2022). Are Fear and Anxiety Truly Distinct? Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science, 2(4), 341–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsgos.2021.09.006
Grogans, S. E., Bliss-Moreau, E., Buss, K. A., Clark, L. A., Fox, A. S., Keltner, D., Cowen, A. S., Kim, J. J., Kragel, P. A., MacLeod, C., Mobbs, D., Naragon-Gainey, K., Fullana, M. A., & Shackman, A. J. (2023). The nature and neurobiology of fear and anxiety: State of the science and opportunities for accelerating discovery. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 151, 105237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105237
LeDoux, J. E., & Pine, D. S. (2016). Using neuroscience to help understand fear and anxiety: A two-system framework. American Journal of Psychiatry, 173(11), 1083–1093. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16030353
National Institute of Mental Health. Anxiety Disorders. Last reviewed December 2024. Accessed September 30, 2026.
National Institute of Mental Health. Definitions of the RDoC Domains and Constructs. Research Domain Criteria. Accessed September 30, 2026.
Perusini, J. N., & Fanselow, M. S. (2015). Neurobehavioral perspectives on the distinction between fear and anxiety. Learning & Memory, 22(9), 417–425. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.039180.115
World Health Organization. (2026, September 15). Anxiety disorders.
World Health Organization. (2024). Clinical descriptions and diagnostic requirements for ICD-11 mental, behavioural and neurodevelopmental disorders. World Health Organization.