Anterior Cingulate Cortex: Monitoring, Effort, and Control
Author: Ukrainian Psychological Hub · Published: October 12, 2026 · Editorial Policy
The anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) is a heterogeneous region on the medial surface of the cerebral hemispheres, involved in coordinating information about goals, actions, effort, outcomes, and bodily or emotional significance. It is frequently investigated when people detect mistakes, respond to competing choices, revise strategies, and decide whether an effortful action is worthwhile. Its functions emerge through interactions among anatomically distinct cingulate areas and wider neural networks, rather than a single psychological operation Heilbronner and Hayden, 2016.
The familiar description of the ACC as the brain's error detector captures one important research tradition. Current neuroscience also studies its contributions to expected value, effort allocation, action, pain, emotion, and salience. These lines of research pose different questions and frequently use different definitions of the region. Much territory called dorsal ACC in cognitive imaging overlaps what anatomists call anterior midcingulate cortex. That distinction is central to interpreting the literature Vogt, 2016.
What is the anterior cingulate cortex? Definition, location, and structure
The cingulate cortex forms a belt along the medial wall of the brain, curving around the corpus callosum, the major white-matter bridge between the cerebral hemispheres. Its anterior part lies near the genu, the forward bend of the corpus callosum. Classical maps place much of the anterior cingulate in portions of Brodmann areas 24, 25, 32, and 33. More refined histological maps identify several populations of areas differing in microscopic cell architecture, receptors, connectivity, and responses in functional tasks Palomero-Gallagher et al., 2019.
ACC terminology varies across disciplines. Researchers may divide the region into dorsal and rostral subdivisions, or into cognitive and affective divisions. Other anatomical schemes distinguish pregenual and subgenual ACC from anterior and posterior midcingulate cortex. Those classifications are not perfectly interchangeable. Comparing study coordinates, cortical sulci, atlas boundaries, and whether a region includes midcingulate tissue is more reliable than assuming every reference to ACC denotes the same patch of cortex Vogt, 2016.
Pregenual anterior cingulate cortex
Pregenual ACC lies around and generally anterior to the genu of the corpus callosum. Fine-grained mapping identifies multiple pregenual areas with different connections and functional associations. Some studies implicate these territories in interoceptive information, emotion-related evaluation, action inhibition, and social-cognitive tasks. Those associations are probabilistic and depend on the task and the particular subarea sampled; activity in pregenual ACC alone does not identify an emotion Palomero-Gallagher et al., 2019.
Subgenual anterior cingulate cortex
Subgenual ACC lies below the genu and is commonly associated with area 25 together with adjacent parts of areas 24 and 32. It is connected to limbic, autonomic, and visceral regulatory networks, and appears in research on mood-related circuitry. Even the subgenual region contains anatomically different fields; a report mentioning it should specify the target more precisely when claiming a mechanism. Its relevance to psychiatric studies does not make it a stand-alone diagnostic marker or imply that stimulating it is broadly effective Palomero-Gallagher et al., 2015.
Dorsal ACC and anterior midcingulate cortex
The dorsal territory examined in studies of performance monitoring, response selection, pain, and effort often includes anterior midcingulate cortex (aMCC). Some anatomical models reserve ACC proper for pregenual and subgenual areas, making aMCC a distinct adjacent region. Other research traditions retain the broad dorsal ACC name. This naming difference can produce apparent conflicts among studies even before considering differences in measurement and task design Shackman et al., 2011.
Connections help explain these functional associations. Different cingulate territories interact with lateral prefrontal cortex, anterior insula, premotor regions, striatum, thalamus, and other systems. The organization is neither uniform nor one-directional: anatomy constrains possible communication, while task-related activity reflects interactions across multiple sites. For neighboring systems, see Prefrontal Cortex: Functions in Planning, Control, and Behavior and Neural Circuits: How Brain Networks Generate Behavior.
What does the anterior cingulate cortex do?
The most consistently investigated ACC-related functions are monitoring performance-relevant events, representing information about costs and expected outcomes, participating in effortful decisions, adjusting behavior in changing conditions, and processing salient affective or bodily signals. These are overlapping families of experiments. Demonstrating increased fMRI activity during a difficult task shows a regional association with the comparison being tested; it does not establish that the region alone executes a particular computation or is necessary for successful performance Heilbronner and Hayden, 2016.
Error monitoring and feedback
Medial frontal activity often changes when a person makes an incorrect response. In an influential study, human anterior cingulate activation occurred during errors and during demanding correct trials, leading to the proposal that performance-relevant conflict or difficulty could contribute to its response Carter et al., 1998. This was an important correction to the interpretation of ACC as an exclusively post-error detector. Research now separates information about the action, feedback, surprise, monitoring demands, and later adjustments to behavior.
EEG research has repeatedly observed an error-related negativity, abbreviated ERN or Ne, shortly after erroneous actions in many laboratory tasks. It is a rapid change in electrical voltage measured at the scalp, commonly discussed in relation to medial frontal monitoring networks. A scalp event-related potential is a weighted mixture of activity from multiple neuronal populations and does not uniquely identify ACC neurons. Larger or smaller ERN amplitude is not a validated individual index of competence, guilt, self-control, or mental disorder Weinberg et al., 2015.
Investigators also measure post-error slowing and whether accuracy improves on the next trial. These behavioral adjustments can occur for different reasons: cautious response strategies, attentional orienting, surprise, or ongoing task changes. The association between ERN amplitude and subsequent performance is more complex than a direct one-to-one relationship, and studies differ in their experimental designs and analyses LoTemplio et al., 2023.
Conflict monitoring and cognitive control
A classic example is the Stroop task, in which a participant names the ink color of a written color word. When the word's meaning conflicts with its ink color, responses often become slower or less accurate. Conflict-monitoring theories propose that medial frontal systems register simultaneous competition among responses and influence subsequent shifts in processing. These models have generated testable behavioral and neural predictions Botvinick et al., 2004.
The difficulty is that Stroop interference combines several variables. Competing response tendencies can covary with time-on-task, error likelihood, surprise, and the effort needed to sustain the instructed goal. The same neural contrast may therefore support more than one cognitive account. Experiments that separate those factors are especially valuable; interpreting a cluster of activation as a direct readout of conflict is an instance of unjustified reverse inference.
Causal evidence poses a particularly important challenge. In a 2025 study of 176 individuals with focal brain injuries, Stroop performance depended on integrity of left lateral frontal tissue rather than medial frontal cortex, despite sampling sufficient to reveal certain other medial frontal lesion effects. This finding questions claims that ACC is necessary for Stroop conflict resolution, while leaving open other cingulate contributions and dependencies in other tasks Cipolotti et al., 2025.
Mental effort, persistence, and the allocation of control
Control can improve a task outcome but requires investment. The expected value of control (EVC) theory proposes that dorsal medial frontal systems integrate expected benefits, control effectiveness, and subjective or opportunity costs to determine whether, where, and how strongly to allocate control. This account unifies the monitoring and valuation traditions in a formal model, but identifying a plausible mathematical quantity is different from proving that all neurons in the region encode it Shenhav et al., 2013.
For example, someone solving a difficult problem can persist, pause, or redirect effort. The payoff of solving it, perceived progress, fatigue, competing obligations, and confidence may all affect the decision. Laboratory studies vary task difficulty and reward to estimate contributions of these variables. An observed ACC response can reflect some combination of effort, action preparation, outcome value, surprise, and changing task representation. Accordingly, no brain scan provides a clinical or personal 'willpower meter.'
Physical and cognitive effort can share some neural systems, but the meaning of effort differs across tasks. Mental arithmetic, gripping a dynamometer, searching for food, and making a difficult social decision recruit overlapping and distinct demands. A model derived from one task cannot automatically explain all forms of persistence. It must be tested against competing explanations and everyday outcomes.
Action valuation and choices after outcomes
Cingulate recordings in animals and human systems research investigate how outcomes of previous actions shape future options. Individual neurons and local populations can carry information about task state, reward, choice history, or prospective behavior. These signals complement information represented in striatum, lateral prefrontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, and other circuits; no cingulate signal contains the complete decision process Heilbronner and Hayden, 2016.
Learning from outcomes may involve reward predictions, changes in expected utility, information about whether a strategy remains appropriate, or other quantities. These computational interpretations are hypotheses that demand task-specific tests. Dopamine affects several related systems but is not a simple molecule of happiness, and a BOLD signal in ACC does not prove a particular neurotransmitter level. For cellular background, read Neurotransmitters: How Chemical Messages Affect the Brain.
Strategy switching, foraging, and hierarchical action
Animals must sometimes exploit a known resource and sometimes explore alternatives; humans face analogous sequential decisions. A 2024 synthesis proposes that rostral and midcingulate regions contribute to a hierarchy of goals, options, and action-level policies in foraging. This framework can explain aspects of flexible strategy selection and links to earlier control theories, but its precise anatomical implementation is still being investigated Alejandro and Holroyd, 2024.
A computational account of foraging illustrates possible mechanisms without providing an automatic explanation for educational motivation or a psychiatric symptom. Transfer across species, reward contexts, and levels of goal complexity requires evidence. Neural recordings in nonhuman primates can illuminate information coding, while human studies must establish that similar computations operate under appropriate conditions.
The ACC, emotion, physical pain, and social experience
Cingulate systems appear in research on emotion, painful stimulation, uncertainty, frustration, motivation, and decision demands. Shackman and colleagues proposed an integrative role for anterior midcingulate cortex in coordinating negative affect, pain, and cognitive control around adaptive responses. Convergent recruitment of a territory may reflect partly shared processes, different local neural populations, or a combination. Regional overlap by itself does not establish psychological identity Shackman et al., 2011.
One prominent debate concerns the specificity of dorsal cingulate responses to pain. A large-scale reverse-inference analysis argued that activation was especially predictive of pain-related contrasts, while other analyses emphasized activation across painful and nonpainful salient events. Both approaches rely on datasets, labeling choices, statistical assumptions, and anatomical definitions. Their disagreement shows why the conditional probability of a psychological process given activation cannot be assumed from the fact that the process sometimes activates the region Lieberman and Eisenberger, 2015; Mouraux et al., 2012.
ACC activity alone cannot establish that a particular individual feels pain or determine its intensity. Similarly, overlapping activations during physical pain and social rejection do not prove that the experiences are identical. Subjective reports, context, behavioral consequences, other neural measurements, and experimental controls remain essential. Describing one region as the 'pain center' or 'social pain center' compresses multiple uncertain interpretations into an unsupported slogan.
Pregenual and subgenual areas are frequently associated with affective, self-relevant, and autonomic processing, while more dorsal anterior midcingulate regions are often active during action selection and demanding experiences. Those are useful research tendencies, not impermeable emotional and cognitive compartments. The same circuit may connect bodily significance with goal-directed behavior under different circumstances.
ACC connectivity and large-scale neural networks
The ACC participates in networks rather than operating as a standalone command station. Structural connections, functional correlations, and task-dependent coupling can give complementary accounts of its role. Anterior insula and dorsal anterior cingulate/anterior midcingulate territory are frequently included in models of the salience network, implicated in prioritizing consequential stimuli and changes in task state Menon and Uddin, 2010.
Resting-state functional connectivity measures statistical associations among regional BOLD time series. These patterns can help describe large-scale systems, but correlated activity does not reveal a direct anatomical path, its direction, or a unique causal 'switch.' Network assignments also depend on preprocessing, atlas choice, thresholding, and individual variability. The phrase salience can mean relevance to goals, sensory prominence, or motivational significance, depending on the experiment Uddin, 2015.
Some accounts describe interactions between salience systems, frontoparietal control networks, and default-mode configurations. Such organization offers a valuable level of analysis, especially when psychological demands change over time, but a single ACC activation cannot determine which network caused another to engage. Anatomical subregions can affiliate with different large-scale networks Touroutoglou and Dickerson, 2019.
How scientists study the anterior cingulate cortex
Structural imaging and tissue maps
Structural MRI measures properties of tissue and provides anatomical images that can be used to estimate thickness, volume, or morphology. Diffusion MRI is sensitive to water diffusion and can support indirect modeling of white-matter pathways; tractography can generate false positives and cannot prove synaptic direction or function. Histology and receptor mapping resolve details inaccessible to ordinary structural scans. A difference in regional size is neither a direct observation of cognitive effort nor an individual psychiatric test.
Functional MRI and the BOLD response
Functional MRI most often measures blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signal fluctuations coupled to local hemodynamic responses associated with neural activity. A statistical contrast can establish that the measured signal differs across defined conditions or covaries with behavior. BOLD is an indirect physiological measurement: it does not count action potentials, measure conscious will, directly sample dopamine release, or establish causal necessity. Temporal smoothing by vascular responses and movement artifacts constrain interpretation.
Anatomical precision matters in the medial frontal wall. Depending on atlas and smoothing, activity assigned to ACC can extend into anterior midcingulate or neighboring premotor cortex. Multiple-comparison corrections, sample size, task definition, and model selection all affect conclusions. For comparisons across imaging methods, see Brain Imaging Methods: What MRI, fMRI, PET, and EEG Measure.
EEG and error-related potentials
Electroencephalography records scalp voltage differences arising largely from coordinated neuronal currents. ERN analyses focus on milliseconds around an action and can therefore reveal timing that fMRI cannot resolve. Spatial localization requires modeling; many candidate sources can produce similar scalp patterns, and no single electrode directly reads a specific ACC subregion. The relationship between an ERN and later behavioral improvement is sensitive to experimental design LoTemplio et al., 2023.
PET, intracranial recording, and single-neuron evidence
Positron emission tomography detects emissions from administered radiotracers and can be used for tracer-dependent estimates of metabolism, receptor availability, or other molecular processes. Its conclusions depend on the tracer and kinetic model. Human intracranial recordings, when available for medical reasons, provide more localized electrical information. Single-neuron recordings in animals can show how individual cells and populations represent actions or outcomes, but species differences and task design limit uncritical extrapolation to human psychological life.
Lesion methods, stimulation, and causal evidence
Focal brain injury can help identify tissue necessary for a tested function, although lesions often affect more than one functional region and can disconnect other sites. Brain stimulation can perturb neural systems but may change downstream network activity beyond the targeted tissue. These designs answer questions that correlational imaging cannot. The 2025 lesion study on Stroop is especially instructive because it questions a strong necessity claim that influential imaging work had encouraged Cipolotti et al., 2025.
Computational models and identification
Computational neuroscience formalizes possible operations such as conflict, reinforcement learning, task-state tracking, and expected control value. The mathematical precision of a model makes its predictions testable, but fitting a set of behavioral or imaging observations does not establish that the brain implements exactly that algorithm. Strong inference requires comparing alternatives under experiments that produce distinguishable predictions, ideally across methods and samples.
Four major accounts of ACC function
Conflict-monitoring theory
Conflict-monitoring theories focus on information about response competition that may signal a need to adjust processing. They helped unify early imaging findings from tasks involving interference and errors. The interpretation remains debated because some measured ACC responses covary with surprise, time-on-task, value, or other demands and because lesion results complicate strong claims of indispensability Botvinick et al., 2004; Cipolotti et al., 2025.
Expected value of control
The EVC framework treats cognitive control allocation as a decision balancing anticipated benefits, the likely efficacy of investing control, and the effort or other costs. It can account for a broader range of responses than conflict alone and provides quantitative hypotheses about control demand and reward. The proposal does not imply that every cingulate subregion encodes the same latent variable or that no alternative model fits the observations Shenhav et al., 2013.
Context and strategy representations
Other accounts emphasize information about the current task, expected outcomes, action options, or the strategy being pursued. This perspective draws on diverse neuronal responses, including animal recordings, and situates cingulate cortex in systems coordinating evaluation with action. Distinct neuronal populations within the same broad area may carry different variables Heilbronner and Hayden, 2016.
Hierarchical control in sequential behavior
Hierarchical models examine how long-term goals can organize intermediate options and specific movements. Their application to ACC and midcingulate cortex offers a way to understand decisions that unfold over time, particularly foraging and persistence. They remain active theoretical proposals whose distinctive predictions need further testing across anatomical territories and human tasks Alejandro and Holroyd, 2024.
What is established, what is provisional, and what is contested?
Established anatomical findings identify heterogeneous anterior and midcingulate territories with different structural connections. Reproducible experimental phenomena include medial frontal activity during certain error-related, attention-demanding, action, pain, and effort tasks; time-locked ERN signals; and large-scale functional-network correlations. The measurement tells us that a physiological response or statistical association occurred under specified circumstances.
Model-dependent interpretations include claims that a designated region computes conflict magnitude, expected control value, a hierarchical action policy, or a network switching instruction. Such models are useful because they generate precise predictions. They are not automatically confirmed by observing activation in a task that also involves the modeled construct.
Contested questions concern the location and meaning of dorsal ACC, its causal necessity for particular control tasks, the degree to which its responses are selective for pain, and the relationship between local physiological signals and conscious psychological experience. A study of 176 lesion patients can qualify an influential imaging claim without resolving every function of all cingulate subregions Cipolotti et al., 2025.
The ACC and mental health: research associations and clinical limits
ACC-related anatomy, resting-state connections, task activation, and ERN responses are investigated in depression, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, chronic pain, and other conditions. These research associations may reflect many influences, including symptoms, history, medication, sleep, movement, or adaptation. Group differences do not determine which individual has a disorder, its mechanism, or its likely treatment response Weinberg et al., 2015.
A single ACC scan, an ERN amplitude, or a reported change in network connectivity is not a validated stand-alone test for depression, OCD, ADHD, or an anxiety disorder. Clinical diagnosis requires appropriate evaluation against the applicable criteria. For an imaging biomarker to guide individual care, it would need reliable prospective accuracy, replication, clinically useful thresholds, and demonstrated added value beyond established assessment.
Studies of neuromodulation near cingulate systems address particular research questions and should be interpreted according to the exact target, clinical condition, protocol, and safety evidence. The fact that a brain region participates in emotional processes does not establish an effective treatment. For clinical contexts see Anxiety and the Brain: Threat Processing, Learning, and What Neuroimaging Can Show.
Common misconceptions
“The ACC is the brain's error detector.” Its involvement in performance monitoring is supported, but errors and adaptations depend on distributed circuits, and ACC-related responses arise during other kinds of demanding events.
“Dorsal ACC is a single anatomically agreed-on structure.” Its boundary with anterior midcingulate cortex differs across parcellation schemes. Anatomical labels and coordinates must be compared before pooling results.
“More ACC activity means more willpower.” Regional activation is sensitive to tasks and analysis choices. There is no validated scale translating one person's activity into moral strength, self-discipline, or persistence.
“ACC activity proves someone is suffering.” Painful and nonpainful tasks can engage overlapping cingulate regions. A scan alone cannot measure an individual's subjective pain or social distress.
“A colored fMRI cluster proves the ACC causes behavior.” BOLD is an indirect hemodynamic measure, and activation does not demonstrate necessity. Lesion and intervention evidence ask different questions.
“The ACC handles feelings and the prefrontal cortex handles thought.” Both regions participate in interlinked systems integrating motivation, bodily significance, learning, and action. Their functions cannot be cleanly divided into feeling and reason.
Frequently asked questions
What is the main function of the anterior cingulate cortex?
ACC-related systems contribute to adapting behavior to goals and circumstances through monitoring, evaluation of action outcomes, effort-sensitive decisions, and integration of relevant emotional or bodily information. Their contribution varies by subregion and task.
Where is the ACC located?
It lies along the medial surface of the brain near the front of the cingulate cortex, around the genu of the corpus callosum. The dorsal territory in many cognitive experiments may anatomically extend into anterior midcingulate cortex.
What happens if the ACC is damaged?
Effects depend on lesion location, size, affected connections, time since injury, and the task examined. Changes in initiation, motivation, and adjustment may occur, but a single universal syndrome cannot be inferred. Some cognitive-control tasks can remain intact after medial frontal damage Cipolotti et al., 2025.
Is ACC part of the limbic system?
The cingulate cortex has historically been included within broad limbic descriptions. Contemporary anatomy divides it into structurally different territories with interactions across motor, control, affective, and autonomic networks. The historical label is less explanatory than regional connectivity and experiments.
How do dorsal and ventral ACC differ?
Dorsal regions are often associated with effort, action, and monitoring tasks, while pregenual and subgenual areas are often examined in affective, interoceptive, and visceral contexts. Both labels are broad, with overlapping functions and disputed boundaries.
Does the ACC produce self-control or motivation?
ACC circuits participate in decisions about effort and goal pursuit alongside many other systems. One region cannot produce the full psychological phenomenon, and no ACC measurement determines a person's motivation or discipline.
Is the ACC responsible for physical pain and social rejection?
It is recruited in some experimental tasks involving pain, threat, and socially significant negative events. Overlap between regional activations supports hypotheses about shared processing demands, not identity of subjective experience or exclusive localization.
Can an ACC scan diagnose OCD, depression, or anxiety?
No stand-alone ACC imaging signature or ERN measure has sufficiently established individual diagnostic utility for those disorders. The research contributes to understanding mechanisms and possible future biomarkers, not replacement of validated clinical assessment.
Can meditation strengthen the ACC?
Studies of attention training and contemplative practices examine neural and behavioral changes, but an imaging difference does not by itself establish a region-specific training mechanism or a meaningful improvement in daily life. Controlled outcomes and alternative explanations matter.
Does ACC activity mean dopamine is high?
BOLD activity does not quantify neurotransmitter release. Dopamine and other chemical signals affect many circuits through context-dependent processes; inferring an individual's neurochemistry from one regional activation is unsupported.
Explore related English neuroscience articles
Continue with Prefrontal Cortex: Functions in Planning, Control, and Behavior, Neural Circuits: How Brain Networks Generate Behavior, and Amygdala: Threat, Salience, Learning, and Emotion.
For background on anatomical systems and measurement, see Hippocampus: Memory, Context, and Spatial Processing, Neurotransmitters: How Chemical Messages Affect the Brain, Brain Imaging Methods: What MRI, fMRI, PET, and EEG Measure, and Left Brain vs. Right Brain: Hemispheres, Specialization, and Myths.
Related Articles
References
Alejandro, R. J., & Holroyd, C. B. (2024). Hierarchical control over foraging behavior by anterior cingulate cortex. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 160, 105623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105623
Botvinick, M. M., Cohen, J. D., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: An update. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15556023/
Carter, C. S., et al. (1998). Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science, 280, 747–749. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.280.5364.747
Cipolotti, L., Mole, J., Ruffle, J. K., Nelson, A., Gray, R., & Nachev, P. (2025). Cognitive control & the anterior cingulate cortex: Necessity & coherence. Cortex, 182, 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2024.11.010
Heilbronner, S. R., & Hayden, B. Y. (2016). Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex: A bottom-up view. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 39, 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-070815-013952
Lieberman, M. D., & Eisenberger, N. I. (2015). The dorsal anterior cingulate cortex is selective for pain: Results from large-scale reverse inference. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1515083112
LoTemplio, S., et al. (2023). Updating the relationship of the Ne/ERN to task-related behavior. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37082151/
Menon, V., & Uddin, L. Q. (2010). Saliency, switching, attention and control: A network model of insula function. Brain Structure and Function, 214, 655–667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-010-0262-0
Mouraux, A., et al. (2012). Shared core areas between the pain and other task-related networks. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22900003/
Palomero-Gallagher, N., et al. (2015). Functional organization of human subgenual cortical areas. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25937490/
Palomero-Gallagher, N., et al. (2019). Human pregenual anterior cingulate cortex: Structural, functional, and connectional heterogeneity. Cerebral Cortex, 29, 2552–2574. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhy124
Shackman, A. J., et al. (2011). The integration of negative affect, pain, and cognitive control in the cingulate cortex. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3044650/
Shenhav, A., Botvinick, M. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2013). The expected value of control: An integrative theory of anterior cingulate cortex function. Neuron, 79, 217–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.007
Touroutoglou, A., & Dickerson, B. C. (2019). Cingulate-centered large-scale networks: Normal functions, aging, and neurodegenerative disease. Handbook of Clinical Neurology. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31731908/
Uddin, L. Q. (2015). Salience processing and insular cortical function and dysfunction. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16, 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3857
Vogt, B. A. (2016). Midcingulate cortex: Structure, connections, homologies, functions and diseases. Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy, 74, 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchemneu.2016.01.010
Weinberg, A., Dieterich, R., & Riesel, A. (2015). Error-related brain activity in the age of RDoC: A review of the literature. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 98, 276–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.02.029