Amotivation: Meaning, Causes, and Psychological Context
Author: Ukrainian Psychological Hub · Published: October 10, 2026 · Editorial Policy
Amotivation describes a state in which a person has little or no intention to engage in a particular activity because its purpose, value, expected outcome, or their capacity to influence that outcome is unclear. In motivation research, it is a defined psychological construct, especially within self-determination theory. A person can experience amotivation toward schoolwork, exercise, employment, or a particular responsibility while remaining engaged and purposeful elsewhere. Amotivation is not itself a psychiatric diagnosis.
The question "Why can't I make myself care or begin?" often involves several different processes. Someone may see no point in an activity, expect to fail despite trying, feel that their effort changes nothing, or face conditions that make meaningful choice difficult. These routes can look similar from the outside, yet understanding them leads to different responses. The foundational self-determination theory account by Ryan and Deci and research on distinct reasons for academic amotivation establish this essential distinction.
What Is Amotivation in Psychology?
Amotivation is the absence or marked reduction of intention to act in relation to an activity or goal. Within self-determination theory (SDT), it describes action that lacks an identified reason, valued purpose, or expectation that behavior will produce a desired effect. Researchers often position it at the low-autonomy end of a motivational continuum, alongside distinct forms of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. It therefore refers to the quality and regulation of motivation rather than simply an insufficient quantity of energy or enthusiasm.
An amotivated student may ask why attending a class matters and find no personally meaningful answer. Another student may understand the importance of grades but believe that studying will make no difference. A third may expect the assignment to exceed their capabilities. These cases can produce the same observable delay, disengagement, or minimal participation, but they rest on different beliefs about value, competence, and control.
In ordinary speech, "unmotivated" can mean bored, tired, discouraged, reluctant, resistant, or emotionally exhausted. Scientific amotivation is more specific. Its hallmark is a breakdown in the person's reason or intention to engage in the target activity. The concept is typically domain-specific, changes with context, and is usually assessed through self-reported reasons for action rather than through an isolated behavior.
Where Amotivation Fits in Self-Determination Theory
SDT examines why people act, how they experience their reasons for acting, and which social conditions support self-endorsed participation. Its established distinctions include intrinsic motivation, several forms of extrinsic motivation, and amotivation. For a comprehensive overview of the wider field, see What Is Motivation? Types, Processes, and Psychological Theories.
Intrinsic motivation involves doing something because the activity itself is interesting or satisfying. Extrinsic motivation involves doing something for an outcome separable from the activity, including outcomes a person genuinely values. An individual may complete routine rehabilitation exercises because recovery matters deeply, even if those exercises are not enjoyable. That person is motivated; the behavior has an intelligible and endorsed purpose.
Amotivation arises when the reason for doing the activity is absent or no longer compelling, or when action seems unable to produce its intended result. Crucially, not enjoying something is insufficient to establish amotivation. A person can dislike a task yet pursue it with strong identified or externally regulated motivation. The Ryan and Deci (2020) review explains why these motivational regulations should be differentiated, while a meta-analysis of 486 samples and more than 205,000 participants broadly supports the proposed continuum structure while identifying important measurement overlap.
Amotivation, controlled motivation, and autonomous motivation
Autonomous motivation refers to behavior experienced as chosen or personally endorsed. Controlled motivation refers to behavior experienced as pressured by external rewards, punishments, demands, or internalized guilt. Both involve reasons for action. Amotivation describes the case in which a workable reason or sense of efficacy is missing. An employee complying reluctantly with a supervisor's instruction is generally demonstrating controlled motivation, whereas an employee who has ceased to see any point in the task may report amotivation.
The finer distinctions between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation belong to Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Motivation: Differences, Examples, and Evidence. The psychological needs framework belongs to Self-Determination Theory: Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness. Here the central issue is how an intention to act becomes disconnected from value, expected effectiveness, or situational support.
Is amotivation the same as having no motivation at all?
Amotivation is seldom an appropriate conclusion about an entire person. One may be disengaged from algebra yet deeply engaged in music, or unmotivated at a particular workplace while energetic in family and community activities. Motivation is organized around activities, meanings, relationships, capacities, and opportunities. Describing the domain and the circumstances yields a much more informative assessment than labeling someone globally unmotivated.
Why Does Amotivation Happen?
Amotivation has multiple routes. The most direct scientific classification comes from Legault, Green-Demers, and Pelletier's research on academic amotivation, which identified dimensions concerning perceived ability, effort beliefs, task characteristics, and the value assigned to the task. These dimensions help distinguish a lack of perceived capability from a lack of meaningful purpose. Although their research concerned students, the conceptual questions are relevant in other settings; generalization to every population requires separate evidence.
1. The activity feels personally meaningless
A task can be understandable and achievable while seeming irrelevant to one's life. The person may know what to do and still see no convincing reason to do it. This value-related form of amotivation can arise when a course, job assignment, or imposed goal appears disconnected from an individual's interests, commitments, or future possibilities.
The response depends on whether meaningful value actually exists. An educator can explain how a topic connects with real problems, invite students to choose a relevant application, or help them evaluate the task's utility. Such approaches seek to make a reason visible rather than manufacture enthusiasm. Some activities have limited personal value, and deciding to decline or renegotiate them may be reasonable.
2. The person doubts their ability to succeed
A second route involves low perceived competence. Someone may value learning a language but believe they lack the ability to improve. Effort seems emotionally costly because success appears implausible. The person's belief about capability becomes a barrier to committing to action.
The concept of self-efficacy concerns judgments about the capacity to carry out actions under relevant conditions. In Bandura's foundational account, efficacy expectations influence whether people initiate and persist in behavior. Beliefs can be inaccurate in either direction, so encouragement works best when paired with attainable challenges, informative feedback, suitable teaching, and actual opportunities to improve.
3. Effort appears unrelated to outcomes
Another person may feel capable of performing individual steps yet believe those steps will change nothing. In a workplace where good performance is never acknowledged, an unpredictable classroom, or a system with uncontrollable rules, the connection between effort and outcome may become weak or hard to detect.
Research on learned helplessness offers a related but distinct framework for understanding consequences of exposure to uncontrollable events. Maier and Seligman's 2016 review revisits the neuroscience and corrects aspects of earlier explanations. Learned helplessness is not a synonym for amotivation, and feelings of futility do not prove that someone has experienced the experimental processes described in helplessness research. Still, expected controllability is a useful question when identifying the source of disengagement.
4. The task environment undermines agency
Tasks can become amotivating when instructions are opaque, feedback is inconsistent, demands are excessive, or the individual has little opportunity to influence methods or pace. Repeated pressure and threats may also change how a task is experienced. A supportive context makes requirements intelligible, offers meaningful choice within real constraints, and helps people see their progress.
Within SDT, autonomy, competence, and relatedness are basic psychological needs. Autonomy concerns a sense of volition, competence concerns effective engagement, and relatedness concerns meaningful connection. Vansteenkiste, Ryan, and Soenens (2020) explain why need satisfaction and active need frustration deserve separate consideration. Specific circumstances may undermine one or several needs, but a low score on a needs questionnaire cannot establish a person's diagnosis or single definitive cause.
5. Prior failure, conflicting goals, and accumulated strain
A series of frustrating experiences can reduce anticipated success, while competing responsibilities can diminish the perceived value of an isolated activity. A goal can also lose relevance when a person's priorities change. Persistent overwork, poor sleep, limited resources, or chronic interpersonal stress may reduce the ability to participate and complicate judgments about motivation.
These factors require careful interpretation. Exhaustion can prevent action even when intention remains strong; conversely, a well-rested person may feel amotivated toward a task whose purpose is unclear. Identifying the dominant barrier is more useful than grouping every difficulty under the same explanation.
How Amotivation Appears in Everyday Life
Amotivation is typically recognized through what a person says about the reasons for acting: "I don't know why I'm doing this," "It won't make a difference," "I don't think I can do it," or "I can't see the point." Behavioral signs can include little initiation, minimal effort, disengagement, or withdrawal from a particular activity. These signs alone cannot establish amotivation because similar behavior can have many causes.
In school and college
A student who cannot see the relevance of required coursework may stop trying. Another may believe academic improvement is impossible after repeated setbacks. A third may be alienated by the structure of instruction. The 2006 three-study investigation of high-school students showed that these differing reasons for amotivation could be examined empirically and related to social context and educational outcomes. The implications are educational and developmental, not diagnostic.
At work
An employee may continue completing routine duties while doubting that effort serves a coherent objective. Lack of feedback, constrained decision-making, conflicting incentives, or perceived inability to influence results can each matter. More pay or stricter supervision may alter compliance without necessarily restoring meaningful engagement. Occupational explanations should be examined alongside job design, fairness, support, and actual working conditions rather than attributed automatically to personality.
In physical activity and health behavior
Someone can recognize a broad recommendation to exercise while doubting their ability to participate safely, see no personal reason to continue, or lack practical access to the activity. These possibilities call for different strategies. A systematic review and meta-analysis of SDT-informed interventions in organized physical activity identified a small average reduction in amotivation, illustrating that supportive design can matter while showing that effects are not universal.
In relationships and personal projects
A person may withdraw from a volunteer project because its purpose has changed or because they have little influence over decisions. Another may lose their reason to pursue a former ambition after a change in life circumstances. Such experiences are meaningful evidence about goals and context, but they cannot be diagnosed from short descriptions. Relationship-specific coercion, safety, and clinical issues deserve their own assessment.
Amotivation Versus Other Psychological Concepts
Careful distinctions are especially important because "no motivation" is used colloquially for very different experiences.
Amotivation versus low intrinsic motivation
Low intrinsic motivation means the activity itself provides little interest or pleasure. The person may nevertheless pursue it because of personal values, obligations, rewards, or meaningful outcomes. Amotivation concerns a more fundamental missing or ineffective reason for acting. An accountant who dislikes entering receipts but values accurate reporting has little intrinsic interest in that task and clear motivation to complete it.
Amotivation versus procrastination
Procrastination involves voluntarily delaying an intended action despite expecting that the delay may make things worse. A procrastinating person may strongly value the goal and still postpone it to escape uncomfortable feelings or immediate demands. Amotivation is more closely defined by absent intention, perceived pointlessness, or ineffective expected action. Procrastination and amotivation can co-occur, but they describe different constructs; a separate EN-27 article will address procrastination directly when its canonical is published.
Amotivation versus laziness or lack of discipline
"Laziness" is an everyday judgment rather than a precise psychological mechanism. It commonly obscures the difference between having no valued goal, doubting one's ability, facing structural barriers, and experiencing difficulty starting an intended task. Discipline and self-regulation may help carry out valued actions under inconvenient conditions, but increased pressure alone cannot supply an absent rationale or create a realistic connection between effort and outcome.
Amotivation versus anhedonia and depression
Anhedonia generally refers to reduced interest or pleasure and is a clinically important symptom, especially in depressive disorders. Depression may also involve low energy, impaired concentration, sleep changes, hopelessness, or changes in functioning. Amotivation is a research construct about reasons and intention in an activity; it does not establish depression, and a depressed individual can also experience valued intentions that become difficult to execute. The National Institute of Mental Health's depression guidance describes the broader clinical presentation. For targeted coverage, see Anhedonia in Depression: Loss of Interest, Pleasure, and Motivation.
Amotivation versus avolition and negative symptoms in schizophrenia
Avolition describes reduced initiation and persistence in goal-directed activities and is considered in clinical evaluations of negative symptoms. Its assessment requires attention to functional changes, underlying illness, medications, mood symptoms, and other explanations. NIMH's schizophrenia resource outlines the clinical context. A self-report of amotivation toward a difficult task cannot be used to infer psychosis or schizophrenia. Read Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia: Motivation, Emotion, and Functioning for the specialized clinical discussion.
Amotivation versus ADHD-related task initiation difficulty
People with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder may struggle with initiation, sustained attention, planning, time management, or executive functioning even when a goal is important and personally meaningful. Some also experience amotivation in specific contexts, as can people without ADHD. The NIMH overview of ADHD in adults describes a developmental clinical condition assessed using a broader history and pattern of symptoms. A missed deadline, inconsistent effort, or an amotivation score cannot diagnose ADHD.
Amotivation versus burnout and fatigue
Burnout is an occupational phenomenon associated with chronic workplace stress in the World Health Organization's classification, and physical or mental fatigue may have many causes. A person experiencing strain may want to act but lack available capacity. Someone reporting amotivation may be physically capable yet find the activity meaningless. The two can overlap. Persistent, widespread deterioration in functioning warrants assessment of health, sleep, stress, medications, circumstances, and emotional symptoms rather than a motivational label alone.
Is Amotivation a Disorder or a Symptom?
Amotivation is a construct used in psychological research, not a standalone DSM or ICD disorder. It can be a temporary, context-specific experience and may accompany psychological or medical problems, but the construct itself does not identify their presence. In a research questionnaire it is usually treated as a motivational regulation or measured dimension. In everyday conversation it may serve as a useful description of a person's relationship to an activity.
Some reports of "I cannot make myself do anything" refer to severe distress, pervasive loss of pleasure, profound fatigue, or inability to carry out essential daily tasks. Those experiences deserve comprehensive clinical consideration. A clinician evaluates duration, severity, context, changes from previous functioning, relevant symptoms, health conditions, medications, and safety. There is no reliable diagnosis available from the word amotivation alone.
How Is Amotivation Measured in Research?
Researchers commonly use domain-specific self-report scales that ask why people participate in school, work, exercise, or other activities. For example, the Academic Motivation Scale developed by Vallerand and colleagues includes an amotivation subscale alongside differentiated forms of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. A response such as uncertainty about one's reason for attending school is interpreted within the instrument and the domain, not as a universal statement about the respondent.
Measurement demands attention to how questions are phrased, which population is sampled, the time frame, and the scale's psychometric properties. Different scales may represent amotivation and the other motivational regulations differently. The Howard, Gagné, and Bureau meta-analysis found broad support for the proposed continuum but also meaningful overlap and variable spacing among motivational factors. Researchers should therefore avoid treating a single score as a complete explanation of behavior.
A scale may be useful for understanding patterns in groups, comparing activities, or monitoring change under research conditions. It is not equivalent to a clinical interview, functional assessment, or medical evaluation. Individual scores cannot determine whether a person is depressed, has ADHD, or lacks character.
What the Evidence Says About Consequences
In studies of education, amotivation has often been examined alongside engagement, persistence, academic outcomes, and students' perceptions of their environments. In the Legault and colleagues series, the reasons underlying disengagement provided a more detailed account than an undifferentiated "no motivation" label. Relationships between self-reported motivational regulations and subsequent behavior can be informative, but observational designs do not automatically establish that amotivation caused every outcome.
Cross-domain results also vary. In health behavior, Ntoumanis and colleagues' meta-analysis considered SDT-informed interventions and their implications for motivation and behavioral outcomes. Evidence for interventions targeting autonomy support is broader than evidence for any single proposed solution to amotivation. Changes in motivational scores and changes in observable behavior are related questions that should be assessed separately.
The research base has several recurring limits. Many studies rely on self-report. Educational samples are prominent. Some measures are sensitive to cultural and institutional contexts; trial quality, implementation, follow-up, and definitions differ. For these reasons, it is inappropriate to claim that amotivation always predicts failure, that an intervention reliably eliminates it, or that a particular motivational category is fixed over time.
What Can Help When You Feel Amotivated?
An evidence-informed response begins by identifying the reason for diminished intention. Practical strategies should be selected according to the obstacle and the person's context. There is no universal protocol that replaces educational support, clinical assessment when indicated, or real changes to an unworkable environment.
Clarify what the activity is supposed to accomplish
Ask what outcome the activity serves, whom it benefits, and whether the result matters to you. A meaningful connection may be immediate, such as finishing an important application, or indirect, such as developing a capability needed for a longer-term goal. If a requirement genuinely lacks purpose or conflicts with priorities, negotiate, modify, or discontinue it when appropriate. Mere repetition of positive statements is unlikely to resolve a genuine absence of value.
Make the effort-to-outcome link visible
Break a broad objective into actions that produce interpretable feedback. A student who doubts the value of studying can compare different practice methods and see which yields learning; an employee may need clear criteria for what successful work changes. Credible feedback helps establish whether effort is effective. If barriers are outside the person's control, the relevant change may involve resources, fair rules, or assistance rather than greater personal exertion.
Build experiences of achievable competence
Match initial demands to present skills, provide appropriate instruction, and allow sufficient practice. Small attainable challenges can give more reliable information about capability than praise without evidence. Perceived competence is part of SDT and is connected to the broader research on self-efficacy. An effective approach permits a person to discover improvement through their own action.
Support autonomy and meaningful choice
Offer choices about timing, method, sequence, or application when possible. Explain necessary constraints respectfully, acknowledge difficulties, and avoid threats and humiliating comparisons. SDT-based instruction and intervention studies provide evidence that need-supportive approaches can improve certain motivational outcomes, although results depend on how interventions are implemented. A 2024 systematic review and meta-analysis in education found benefits for intrinsic motivation and perceived autonomy and competence; it should not be interpreted as proof that every educational amotivation problem is resolved by offering choices.
Strengthen relatedness and access to help
Constructive relationships with teachers, colleagues, coaches, and peers can make feedback understandable and support persistence. Social support is relevant in academic research on amotivation, but it works alongside task design and actual resources. Involving a trusted person to clarify an assignment, obtain training, or troubleshoot an obstacle may be more useful than asking them to exert more pressure.
Reconsider goals and environmental constraints
Sometimes a goal was inherited, imposed, or retained long after circumstances changed. Reviewing its meaning may be appropriate. At other times, the goal remains important but inaccessible because of money, disability accommodations, illness, workload, discriminatory conditions, or lack of opportunity. Solutions may require system-level changes. A psychology of motivation becomes more accurate when the environment is treated as part of the explanation.
Use behavior tools for the barrier they can actually address
A schedule, reminder, implementation intention, or simplified first step may help a person who has a valued goal and struggles with initiation. A habit cue can reduce the need to decide repeatedly. These tools primarily address execution, organization, or automaticity; they do not by themselves establish a reason to act. When the central problem is amotivation, clarify value, capability, and contingency before expecting planning tools to work. No fixed number of days or single "willpower" technique guarantees change.
Address persistent clinical or physical difficulties
When diminished motivation extends across formerly rewarding activities, or appears with sustained low mood, severe fatigue, sleep disruption, cognitive changes, psychotic symptoms, substantial functional decline, or new medication effects, assessment is appropriate. NIMH's depression guidance describes when to seek support for depressive symptoms. If depression is diagnosed, evidence-based care may include approaches such as behavioral activation. Clinical interventions are selected according to the condition and individual circumstances rather than on the basis of an amotivation label.
Does Research Show That Amotivation Can Change?
Motivational regulations can change when beliefs, relationships, opportunities, or task demands change. But the strength of evidence depends on the population, domain, intervention, and outcome. In Manninen and colleagues' meta-analysis of physical-activity interventions, reductions in amotivation were small on average, consistent with the idea that supportive interventions can help while providing limited grounds for sweeping promises.
In health, Ntoumanis and colleagues and Sheeran and colleagues examined the relationship between changing autonomy, competence, and behavioral outcomes. These syntheses support examining motivational processes but underscore that intervention delivery, effects on mediators, and actual behavior change are separate empirical questions.
The most defensible practical conclusion is conditional: an intervention is more likely to address the problem when it accurately identifies why intention has weakened and changes the relevant mechanism. A student who sees no value in a class, a worker who has no discretion, and a patient who doubts the feasibility of an activity require different adjustments.
What Research Still Needs to Explain
The literature needs stronger long-term and causal evidence about distinct routes to amotivation, particularly outside educational contexts. Researchers continue to investigate how beliefs about effort and ability relate to real opportunities, how effects differ across age and cultural settings, and which interventions improve both self-reported motivation and sustained participation. Better reporting of baseline motivation, comparison conditions, implementation fidelity, and follow-up would clarify which mechanisms account for change.
Another important issue is whether instruments capture amotivation equally well across domains. A belief that academic effort cannot change grades is psychologically different from an inability to exert effort because of illness. Measurement and clinical interpretation must keep these cases distinct. The research also benefits from a clearer separation of personal regulation and institutional responsibility for creating environments in which action is meaningful and effective.
Frequently Asked Questions About Amotivation
What is a simple definition of amotivation?
Amotivation means lacking a clear intention or effective reason to engage in a specific activity. A person might perceive the activity as pointless, feel unable to succeed, or believe effort will not affect the outcome. The construct comes from motivation research, particularly self-determination theory.
Is amotivation a type of extrinsic motivation?
In SDT, amotivation is distinguished from both intrinsic motivation and regulated forms of extrinsic motivation. Extrinsic regulation involves acting for some outcome, including an externally imposed or personally valued outcome. Amotivation describes the absence or ineffectiveness of a reason to act.
Can someone have amotivation in only one area of life?
Yes. A student may feel amotivated about a particular class and highly motivated to work, maintain friendships, or practice an instrument. Domain specificity is essential to interpreting the term responsibly.
What causes amotivation in students?
Research highlights several routes: low belief in ability, doubts that effort will matter, aversive or confusing task features, and low perceived value. Social context, instruction, feedback, and resources can also contribute. Legault and colleagues examined these dimensions specifically in high school settings.
Does amotivation mean that someone is depressed?
No. Amotivation is a motivational construct, whereas depression is a clinical disorder with a broader symptom pattern and diagnostic criteria. Depression may affect interest, pleasure, energy, and initiation; assessment is warranted when changes are persistent, pervasive, distressing, or impairing.
How is amotivation different from being tired?
Tiredness describes reduced energy or alertness. A tired person can retain a strong intention to complete a task but lack available capacity. An amotivated person may feel physically capable yet have little perceived reason to act. The two experiences can coexist.
Is amotivation the same as procrastination?
No. Procrastination often involves delaying a task one intends to complete. Amotivation involves little or no intention because the task's value, feasibility, or expected impact is uncertain or absent. They can sometimes occur together.
Can autonomy-supportive teaching reduce amotivation?
Supportive teaching is a scientifically grounded direction, but direct effects on amotivation depend on the intervention and study. Wang and colleagues' 2024 review provides evidence for improvements in some motivation and psychological-need outcomes; it does not establish a universal remedy.
Can rewards fix amotivation?
Rewards can sometimes increase participation, but their meaning depends on how they are introduced, the task, and whether the person experiences them as informative, controlling, valuable, or irrelevant. Simply adding incentives may produce short-term compliance without restoring personally endorsed purpose. The relevant concepts are explained in Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Motivation.
When should lack of motivation prompt professional help?
Consider assessment when the change is persistent, affects multiple important areas, or comes with significant distress, loss of pleasure, markedly impaired daily functioning, health changes, or other concerning symptoms. Professionals can investigate psychological, medical, environmental, and medication-related explanations. In urgent situations involving immediate safety concerns, use local emergency services.
Related Articles
Motivation, Habits, and Self-Control: Psychology of Behavior Change provides the overarching framework connecting motivation with habits, regulation, and behavior change.
What Is Motivation? Types, Processes, and Psychological Theories is the parent article for the Motivation branch and explains the wider family of psychological theories.
Self-Determination Theory: Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness develops the theory in which amotivation has its best-known research definition.
Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Motivation: Differences, Examples, and Evidence clarifies the difference between enjoying an activity, valuing its outcomes, and experiencing a missing reason to participate.
Anhedonia in Depression: Loss of Interest, Pleasure, and Motivation addresses an important clinical distinction.
Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia: Motivation, Emotion, and Functioning explains clinical avolition and related symptoms.
Motivation in the Age of AI: Effort, Goals, Self-Efficacy, and Human Agency examines human motivation in a distinct human–AI context.
Related concept: Approach vs. Avoidance Motivation: Goals, Rewards, and Threats
References
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/847061/
Howard, J. L., Gagné, M., & Bureau, J. S. (2017). Testing a continuum structure of self-determined motivation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 143(12), 1346–1377. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000125
Legault, L., Green-Demers, I., & Pelletier, L. G. (2006). Why do high school students lack motivation in the classroom? Toward an understanding of academic amotivation and the role of social support. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.567
Maier, S. F., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2016). Learned helplessness at fifty: Insights from neuroscience. Psychological Review, 123(4), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000033
Manninen, M., Dishman, R., Hwang, Y., Magrum, E., Deng, Y., & Yli-Piipari, S. (2022). Self-determination theory based instructional interventions and motivational regulations in organized physical activity: A systematic review and multivariate meta-analysis. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 62, 102248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2022.102248
National Institute of Mental Health. (n.d.). Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adults: What you need to know. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/adhd-what-you-need-to-know
National Institute of Mental Health. (n.d.). Depression. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/depression
National Institute of Mental Health. (n.d.). Schizophrenia. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/schizophrenia
Ntoumanis, N., Ng, J. Y. Y., Prestwich, A., Quested, E., Hancox, J. E., Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C., Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Lonsdale, C., & Williams, G. C. (2021). A meta-analysis of self-determination theory-informed intervention studies in the health domain: Effects on motivation, health behavior, physical, and psychological health. Health Psychology Review, 15(2), 214–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2020.1718529
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Sheeran, P., Wright, C. E., Avishai, A., Villegas, M. E., Rothman, A. J., & Klein, W. M. P. (2021). Does increasing autonomous motivation or perceived competence lead to health behavior change? A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 40(9), 706–716. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001111
Vallerand, R. J., et al. (1992). The Academic Motivation Scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164492052004025
Vansteenkiste, M., Ryan, R. M., & Soenens, B. (2020). Basic psychological need theory: Advancements, critical themes, and future directions. Motivation and Emotion, 44, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-019-09818-1
Wang, Y., Wang, H., Wang, S., Wind, S. A., & Gill, C. (2024). A systematic review and meta-analysis of self-determination-theory-based interventions in the education context. Learning and Motivation, 87, 102015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102015